• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Prestigious women dating disparity.

You won't see any such research because anyone communicating such research would be severely punished.

A lot of these women are go-getters (which is why they tend to be successful). If there is a solvable problem, then type A personalities will find a way to solve it in time.
 
Last edited:
You won't see any such research because anyone communicating such research would be severely punished.

Oh more victimization and conspiracy theories :roll:

You are literally complaining that women are acting the way you keep recommending that men should in relationships.
 
OK, sure. Let's just shrug and say that executive women can't find relationships because of bad luck. Life gets simple when a solution is not of interest. Just let it be.

You rarely source a thing...all you go off of is your limited, bitter experience...which I find completely invalid.

So of course if you cant support your opinions, they are meaningless in these arguments.

and I will continue to point out the hypocrisy of the OP.
 
OK, sure. Let's just shrug and say that executive women can't find relationships because of bad luck. Life gets simple when a solution is not of interest. Just let it be.

Nobody's claiming that. And I didnt really see where the women were complaining. They could 'settle,' that was clear. But they choose to go without if they cant find an equal partner.

Seems smart to me....better than whining they've been 'taken advantage of' like victims.
 
Oh more victimization and conspiracy theories :roll:

You are literally complaining that women are acting the way you keep recommending that men should in relationships.

Thank you, he seems to have completely missed my point, which is if someone is successful, they are going to be them and not hide that personality due to circumstance (because money and success means they don't have to). However, being unwilling to compromise makes relationships harder. THIS IS NOT A GENDER ISSUE, but its just a fact of personality.

I suspect if these women do find their partner, its going to be an even better relationship because, it will be two genuine people.
 
If one defines an "equal partner" as someone with a similar income and title, that means that a man that has a career setback can expect to be kicked to the curb. It also means pressure not to retire. That's not a very good deal.

Nobody's claiming that. And I didnt really see where the women were complaining. They could 'settle,' that was clear. But they choose to go without if they cant find an equal partner.

Seems smart to me....better than whining they've been 'taken advantage of' like victims.
 
If one defines an "equal partner" as someone with a similar income and title, that means that a man that has a career setback can expect to be kicked to the curb. It also means pressure not to retire. That's not a very good deal.

Sadly for you, that's not all that 'equal partner' means. Sadly for you because you really dont understand the concept of equal partners and good healthy relationships at all.
 
See? These professional women are already smarter than the men you make out as victims of women marrying them for their $$ and then getting it all in divorces.

These women know better, dont have to learn that lesson. So why would you criticize these women? Why should they be criticized by anyone?

We dont have to settle and maybe (maybe) men are just more driven to get laid and ignore some of the other practicalities...or not take the time to invest in the rest of the relationship.

Glad a level-headed woman finally came in and broke up this sausage fest.
 
Glad a level-headed woman finally came in and broke up this sausage fest.

That doesn't sound level headed to me. We don't have to settle? I mean yeah you could be alone forever but if you want to be with someone you're going to have to accept things about them that you may not like. If the only man that will work for you is the perfect man you're going to be alone. True you don't have to settle for a man that's less than perfect but that will mean you will be alone. Some people are okay with that.

But the article but at least in the OP was talking about women who are seeking men. They were getting frustrated because the men they desire did not desire them.
 
just another incel.

He absolutely is. Reminds me of another guy who used to hang around here who only had “relations” with Asian hookers because western women were too much trouble (i.e. he couldn’t run over them).
 
He absolutely is. Reminds me of another guy who used to hang around here who only had “relations” with Asian hookers because western women were too much trouble (i.e. he couldn’t run over them).

as a guy who does a lot of tabletop role playing, I see his type ALL THE TIME
 
Just imagine how unpleasant it would be working for such a frustrated old woman!

That doesn't sound level headed to me. We don't have to settle? I mean yeah you could be alone forever but if you want to be with someone you're going to have to accept things about them that you may not like. If the only man that will work for you is the perfect man you're going to be alone. True you don't have to settle for a man that's less than perfect but that will mean you will be alone. Some people are okay with that.

But the article but at least in the OP was talking about women who are seeking men. They were getting frustrated because the men they desire did not desire them.
 
You can't do better than that? Try thought instead of copy-and-paste.

sometimes a spade is a spade and not a trowel or a shovel, so no reason to get fancy with the verbage
 
Except Asia is too far away. A $59 bus ticket will get a guy to Latin America. If a guy doesn't have enough gumption to even learn Spanish, then he's hopeless.

He absolutely is. Reminds me of another guy who used to hang around here who only had “relations” with Asian hookers because western women were too much trouble (i.e. he couldn’t run over them).
 
Except Asia is too far away. A $59 bus ticket will get a guy to Latin America. If a guy doesn't have enough gumption to even learn Spanish, then he's hopeless.

Why don’t you just roll a woman in flour and look for the wet spot? Honestly, that’s about your speed.
 
It's not a personal attack. If you interview for a gig and notice you'll be reporting to a frustrated old women, just say "pass".

I'm not interested in personal attacks
 
whenever shall women truly believe in equality and helping guys they may like, get really really Good at something. Girl Friends do, in modern times.
 
Damn, I should try that. It sounds kinky. Thanks for the idea! Remember: One can roll a 19 year old cutie in flour just as easy if not easier!

Why don’t you just roll a woman in flour and look for the wet spot? Honestly, that’s about your speed.
 
as a guy who does a lot of tabletop role playing, I see his type ALL THE TIME


From a woman’s point of view, I do admit that it’s frustrating that women are not taken seriously online. Many men assume women are only online, message boards etc, to find a guy. Similar to the 50s college mindset, where women only went to college to find a good husband.
 
Back
Top Bottom