Prestigious women dating disparity.

[Rich2018]

She should be grateful if she understands the indignity that she has been spared by a husband that deals with that in her stead.

Will the husband be similarly grateful if he understands the indignity he's been spared by a wife who deals with that in his stead ?

 

[Rich2018]

I agree with that. I can't imagine being with a young woman who wants to go out all the time. And what would you have to talk about? Sounds boring. Hand me the crossword puzzle.

I guess you watch teen movies, talk about new ways of curling your hair and catch up on what Kim Kardashian is doing...


Will she hang up her Pokemon-Go and learn Bridge ?

 

[SDET]

Think of her as a project. The joy is in to finish raising her. It's important to pace yourself though. Once you finish teaching her, she might decide that she wants to move on. If you have a kid with her, make sure it takes 18 years to keep developing her. On the other hand, she could lack motivation and stay just the way she is. The advantage of the latter is that she never leaves. The advantage of the former is that you get to enjoy her during her best years before she moves on. Either way, it's a win-win.

If she doesn't speak English, even better because that gives you both yet another common goal. Any man that either marries a 18 or 19 year old or has her as a mistress should develop a kind of curriculum. It will add purpose to the relationship. Having children with a mistress is a REALLY STUPID idea. Get a vasectomy if necessary.

I agree with that. I can't imagine being with a young woman who wants to go out all the time. And what would you have to talk about? Sounds boring. Hand me the crossword puzzle

 

[Lursa]

Simple: A high-earning man wants an 18 or 19 year old. What's the point of painstakingly building a career only to marry a post-wall woman? From a family point of view: Having children with a woman pushing 40 is a high risk pursuit.

See? These professional women are already smarter than the men you make out as victims of women marrying them for their $$ and then getting it all in divorces.

These women know better, dont have to learn that lesson. So why would you criticize these women? Why should they be criticized by anyone?

We dont have to settle and maybe (maybe) men are just more driven to get laid and ignore some of the other practicalities...or not take the time to invest in the rest of the relationship.

 

[SDET]

All I'm saying is that these kind of women aren't wife material. They might be mistress material when they are young. A good litmus test is this: If she makes good use of the financial and academic support provided by her patron she will get a good degree and start a good career. Some women just get comfortable and dependent. I recommend against dumping a comfortable and dependent wife because that will lose a man the respect of his adult children. It's the difference between a permanent and a temporary relationship. Both are good.

See? These professional women are already smarter than the men you make out as victims of women marrying them for their $$ and then getting it all in divorces.

These women know better, dont have to learn that lesson. So why would you criticize these women? Why should they be criticized by anyone?

We dont have to settle and maybe (maybe) men are just more driven to get laid and ignore some of the other practicalities...or not take the time to invest in the rest of the relationship.

 

[Lursa]

All I'm saying is that these kind of women aren't wife material. They might be mistress material when they are young. A good litmus test is this: If she makes good use of the financial and academic support provided by her patron she will get a good degree and start a good career. Some women just get comfortable and dependent. I recommend against dumping a comfortable and dependent wife because that will lose a man the respect of his adult children. It's the difference between a permanent and a temporary relationship. Both are good.

That's right...they arent for men that cant handle a woman as an equal. And such women dont want those men either. But my point is...according to what you always write...that men are victimized by women...here we have women that are smart enough not to put themselves in the same position.

 

[SDET]

Those women are otherwise known as cutthroat. Why have someone around that looks for people to stab in the back? Hence, why they are alone.

That's right...they arent for men that cant handle a woman as an equal. And such women dont want those men either. But my point is...according to what you always write...that men are victimized by women...here we have women that are smart enough not to put themselves in the same position.

 

[danielpalos]

See? These professional women are already smarter than the men you make out as victims of women marrying them for their $$ and then getting it all in divorces.

These women know better, dont have to learn that lesson. So why would you criticize these women? Why should they be criticized by anyone?

We dont have to settle and maybe (maybe) men are just more driven to get laid and ignore some of the other practicalities...or not take the time to invest in the rest of the relationship.

I think most guys would not mind helping their wife do something she likes, and let the money follow eventually, since she should not have to be in a hurry to learn new market based skills if a divorce should occur eventually.

Having such interests could potentially save the marriage or let the wife help out her ex-husband in a market friendly manner should it be him that falls on hard times.

 

[danielpalos]

That's right...they arent for men that cant handle a woman as an equal. And such women dont want those men either. But my point is...according to what you always write...that men are victimized by women...here we have women that are smart enough not to put themselves in the same position.

Why does it seem women are simply willing to "manipulate us for sex", when guy doesn't have much money instead try to be friends simply Because they are "girls".

For comparison and contrast, it "merely takes Gold for men to be equal to women concerning sex.", regarding; equal sexual work for equal sexual pay".

 

[danielpalos]

Those women are otherwise known as cutthroat. Why have someone around that looks for people to stab in the back? Hence, why they are alone.

I believe we could improve our capital morality in modern times by simply solving for simple poverty in our Republic. Guys would not have to lie as much and women would not need men as much merely for money.

 

[Cynical]

I've never understood that.

Why is a young woman attractive to an older ma.


I get the rich, older men don't want a woman all wrinkled and saggy but why do they want someone emotionally immature ?

Because by nature men are much more motivated by a woman's looks than vice versa.

 

[danielpalos]

nice girls who are willing to be friends don't even need guile or one thousand and one nights to make their point;

you could be activity partners in modern times.

 

[SDET]

Men and women have little in common. The closest you might get to that "activity partner" is a mentor-mentee relationship. Are you willing to guide someone through college by tutoring her and perhaps even pay her tuition just to be "friends"?

nice girls who are willing to be friends don't even need guile or one thousand and one nights to make their point;

you could be activity partners in modern times.

 

[danielpalos]

Men and women have little in common. The closest you might get to that "activity partner" is a mentor-mentee relationship. Are you willing to guide someone through college by tutoring her and perhaps even pay her tuition just to be "friends"?

even in modern times where even women can push buttons and move levers?

 

[Lursa]

Those women are otherwise known as cutthroat. Why have someone around that looks for people to stab in the back? Hence, why they are alone.

Why are "such women" known in that negative way but the men that you recommend act exactly the same are not?

 

[SDET]

It's called adapting. Men didn't start feminism, but an increasing number are figuring out how to respond to it. The result is zero good will.

Why are "such women" known in that negative way but the men that you recommend act exactly the same are not?

 

[Lursa]

It's called adapting. Men didn't start feminism, but an increasing number are figuring out how to respond to it. The result is zero good will.

Feminism? Why is it wrong for both to be treated and respected equally?

And again...you refer to men as victims while criticizing women for acting like you claim men should :doh

The hypocrisy is mind-boggling.

 

[SDET]

Feminists only believe in an "Animal Farm" style of "equality".

Feminism? Why is it wrong for both to be treated and respected equally?

And again...you refer to men as victims while criticizing women for acting like you claim men should :doh

The hypocrisy is mind-boggling.

 

[Lursa]

Feminists only believe in an "Animal Farm" style of "equality".

That's victimized BS.

Feel free to source it.

You make most men sound like ******s, easily taken advantage of just because of their dicks. If men are that way...it has nothing to do with feminism...men have been acting that way *forever.*

 

[SDET]

From the Boomer generation forward, too many men have allowed themselves to act like ******s. A great classroom for a young man these days is "Family" Court. I never stop being grateful for being raised by Greatest/Silent Generation parents.

That's victimized BS.

Feel free to source it.

You make most men sound like ******s, easily taken advantage of just because of their dicks. If men are that way...it has nothing to do with feminism...men have been acting that way *forever.*

 

[Lursa]

From the Boomer generation forward, too many men have allowed themselves to act like ******s. A great classroom for a young man these days is "Family" Court.

Source it...or cop the total hypocrisy.

Feminists only believe in an "Animal Farm" style of "equality".

 

[Slartibartfast]

This article from The Wall Street journal struck me as rather odd. It's basically saying that women who have achieved a high rank in their career we are having difficulty finding the type of men they want.

A Good Man Is Getting Even Harder to Find - WSJ

It seems that men of the same status don't want to date professional women in general. I'm sure there are exceptions to every rule. But I find this funny men not doing as well as women is a problem for women.

I can understand why a man who work 70 hours a week doesn't want to marry a woman that work 70 hours a week you'll never see each other.

It's funny how they're characterizing this as these professional men not stepping up is though there's nothing wrong with women's preferences. There's nothing wrong with the professional woman marrying a blue collar man. Or even as stay-at-home man. But professional women don't seem to want that.

Right now, I don't think there is any really agreed on research on why and I suspect any answers will be what people don't want to hear since its going to boil down to raw personality conflicts in many cases. I have dated two highly successful women in my life.

- One was an absolute nightmare. She was controlling, entitled, picky, was always setting me challenges to try and gain her affection, would get mad at me for reasons I may never understand (and I suspect were not rooted in reality), and talked bad about me behind my back.
- The other woman was absolutely wonderful. Very affectionate, loving, and just easy going, but we lived too far from each other and we are open to get back together if that circumstance changed.

The only thing I can think of is that woman A might be more likely to suppress that part of her nature for security if needed (but that's not a thing only one gender does).

 

[SDET]

There's more to life than copy and paste. I don't keep a recorded archive of all discussions over the decades. Recall that the OP is regarding why men steer clear of executive women.

Source it...or cop the total hypocrisy.

 

[Lursa]

There's more to life than copy and paste. I don't keep a recorded archive of all discussions over the decades. Recall that the OP is regarding why men steer clear of executive women.

You rarely source a thing, you rarely even answer a direct question directly...all you go off of is your limited, bitter experience...which I find completely invalid.

So of course if you cant support your opinions, they are meaningless in these arguments.

and I will continue to point out the hypocrisy of the OP.

 

[SDET]

You won't see any such research because anyone communicating such research would be severely punished.

Right now, I don't think there is any really agreed on research on why and I suspect any answers will be what people don't want to hear since its going to boil down to raw personality conflicts in many cases. I have dated two highly successful women in my life.

- One was an absolute nightmare. She was controlling, entitled, picky, was always setting me challenges to try and gain her affection, would get mad at me for reasons I may never understand (and I suspect were not rooted in reality), and talked bad about me behind my back.
- The other woman was absolutely wonderful. Very affectionate, loving, and just easy going, but we lived too far from each other and we are open to get back together if that circumstance changed.

The only thing I can think of is that woman A might be more likely to suppress that part of her nature for security if needed (but that's not a thing only one gender does).