• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

President ****bag Criming in Real Time During Yovanovitch's Testimony

GDViking said:
I wasn't watching at the time but it is clear that she was made aware of the tweet...
Click to expand...

So riddle me this... if she wasn't made aware of that tweet, would it still have been witness intimidation?
 
ludin said:
she isn't a public servant she was fired months ago.
she is not employed.
Click to expand...


Wrong,she still works for the government in a lesser roll.

She is not an ambassador, but she is still a government employee...
 
Fledermaus said:
I have to protest. I don't like blanket statements like that.

We can agree snakestretcher does not understand logic and reason.
Click to expand...

i read the tweets there is nothing threatening in the tweet at all.

i will post it for everyone to read.

Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a U.S. President’s absolute right to appoint ambassadors.

They call it “serving at the pleasure of the President.” The U.S. now has a very strong and powerful foreign policy, much different than proceeding administrations. It is called, quite simply, America First! With all of that, however, I have done FAR more for Ukraine than O.

full disclosure of the tweet and everything in it.

there is nothing intimidating or threatening in the tweet.
 
ludin said:
she isn't a public servant she was fired months ago.
she is not employed.
Click to expand...

She is still an employee of the Department of State. She lost her ambassadorship but she's still employed by the US government. Her current posting is the Senior State Department Fellow at Georgetown University's Institute for the Study of Diplomacy.
 
Fledermaus said:
Please detail what "witness intimidation" you imagine to have happened.
Click to expand...

He's already done it: She's going to be going through some things.
I'll also cut you off at the pass: She wouldn't play dirty ball with him and looked to be letting everyone else know about his criminal mafia-like acts, so yeah, the Pres sayin' that would be pretty intimidating.
 
ludin said:
i read the tweets there is nothing threatening in the tweet at all.

i will post it for everyone to read.

Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a U.S. President’s absolute right to appoint ambassadors.

They call it “serving at the pleasure of the President.” The U.S. now has a very strong and powerful foreign policy, much different than proceeding administrations. It is called, quite simply, America First! With all of that, however, I have done FAR more for Ukraine than O.

full disclosure of the tweet and everything in it.

there is nothing intimidating or threatening in the tweet.
Click to expand...

Words from a dedicated worshipper of his dear ****bag.
 
trixare4kids said:
So riddle me this... if she wasn't made aware of that tweet, would it still have been witness intimidation?
Click to expand...

i posted the tweet just above this post it was not intimidating or threatening.
 
digitusmedius said:
She is still an employee of the Department of State. She lost her ambassadorship but she's still employed by the US government. Her current posting is the Senior State Department Fellow at Georgetown University's Institute for the Study of Diplomacy.
Click to expand...

Come on now, it's not fair to use facts on them.
 
digitusmedius said:
so, ****bag launches a smear tweet against a witness while she's testifying. He can't stop committing crimes even as his old crimes are revealed.
Click to expand...

laffriot!!!!
 
digitusmedius said:
So, ****bag launches a smear tweet against a witness WHILE SHE's TESTIFYING. He can't stop committing crimes even as his old crimes are revealed.
Click to expand...

I am not convinced the tweet rises to the level of 'witness intimidation', but it is certainly ill advised. To me it shows a President lashing out because he is intimidated by the witness.
 
element94 said:
He's already done it: She's going to be going through some things.
I'll also cut you off at the pass: She wouldn't play dirty ball with him and looked to be letting everyone else know about his criminal mafia-like acts, so yeah, the Pres sayin' that would be pretty intimidating.
Click to expand...
Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a U.S. President’s absolute right to appoint ambassadors.

They call it “serving at the pleasure of the President.” The U.S. now has a very strong and powerful foreign policy, much different than proceeding administrations. It is called, quite simply, America First! With all of that, however, I have done FAR more for Ukraine than O.

here is the tweet point out the threat or intimidation.
 
trixare4kids said:
That's how the Democrat clown car's narrative will go by the end of the day as you well know...
Click to expand...

Can any of you get past your hatred Democrats and look at Trump objectively? Would you accept his behavior form anyone else?
 
Aristaeus said:
Just for the Trumpers:

Rep. Elise Stefanik to me on Trump’s tweet attacking Yovanovitch: “I disagree with the tweet. I think Ambassador Yovanovitch is a public servant, like many of our public servants in the foreign service.”

Ken Starr on Fox News says Trump's tweet showed "extraordinarily poor judgment – the president frequently says I follow my instincts. Sometimes we have to control our instincts. So obviously this was quite injurious."

“We didn’t need that.” That’s what a Senior GOP source tells Fox about the President’s tweet.
Click to expand...

Yes, Starr said all that, but more importantly, he also said the above was not an "impeachable offense".
 
trixare4kids said:
So riddle me this... if she wasn't made aware of that tweet, would it still have been witness intimidation?
Click to expand...

Omichrist....do you people not know anything about criminal laws or just pretend to be ignorant in order to prop up Your Dear ****bag? You've already tried the ridiculous and totally false notion that it's not a crime if it's unsuccessful and now you're beyond ignorantly claiming that it's only a crime if the victim hears about it. Every time I think ****bag proppers couldn't get any more ludicrously desperate they prove that there's no limit to that desperation.
 
ludin said:
point out the threat or intimidation then.
Click to expand...

When was the last time you remember a President involving himself in an ongoing investigation and threatening witnesses? Oh yeah, Nixon... didn't turn out so well for him.
 
digitusmedius said:
Words from a dedicated worshipper of his dear ****bag.
Click to expand...

Please detail what "witness intimidation" you imagine to have happened.

And remember... It was Schiff that told her of the tweet. She would not have known (therefore no intimidation) without his contribution.
 
Fledermaus said:
I gave you the law.

Therefore you are guilty

According to your rules.

Please fail again.
Click to expand...

I'm always grateful for you people having no hesitation at showing us ridiculous you are.
 
Cardinal said:
Threaten the President's life by tweet. Then, when the Secret Service pays you a visit, tell them that it was a tweet so it didn't count.
Click to expand...

False equivalency.

Trump didn't threaten the former ambassador's life.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom