President ****bag Criming in Real Time During Yovanovitch's Testimony

[Rexedgar]

Exactly. And neither is the President "just another citizen".

BTW - I'm watching Amb Yonavanovitch during the GOP questioning phase. She is one helluva' sharp & composed witness!

What’s your opinion of the two counsels? This isn’t helping Castor’s resume, imo

 

[Chomsky]

What’s your opinion of the two counsels? This isn’t helping Castor’s resume, imo

Due to being really busy lately, this is literally the first segment I've watched. So, I can't offer an opinion. But thanks for asking.

 

[Simon W. Moon]

Isn't leftists who keep saying this isn't a criminal trial?

Does someone have to be a leftist to realize that a House inquiry is not a criminal trial?
Is that a partisan issue somehow?

 

[digitusmedius]

Even if ****bag's minions are waving this off, this tweet caused a panic in the WH resulting in emergency meetings with the WH counsel and the communications director. And even such a low-life as Liz Cheney had this to say:

Rep. Liz Cheney said Yovanovitch “clearly is somebody who’s been a public servant to the United States for decades and I don’t think the president should have done that.”

 

[Acadia]

Does someone have to be a leftist to realize that a House inquiry is not a criminal trial?
Is that a partisan issue somehow?

Everyone realizes this is a kangaroo court. Apparently if you have a vagina, you aren't allowed to question the witness.

 

[digitusmedius]

What’s your opinion of the two counsels? This isn’t helping Castor’s resume, imo

If his brief was to discredit Yovanovitch he's clearly failing to do that. If anything, his attempt at humor about being surprised at mean things being said on social media made her look better as she just got a big laugh for saying the same thing. I wouldn't be surprised if we see a "pitching change" by next week.

 

[digitusmedius]

I have yet to read from anyone how the Tweet was intimidating or threatening when she had NO knowledge of it ... well, that is, until Schiffty read it to her.

This sort of excuse-making for criminal activity is just weird as well as grotesquely desperate. A crime is not negated because the victim was unaware of it the exact instant it occurred and the other idiotic claim that a crime is not committed if it's unsuccessful. It's hard to believe there could be people so stupid to make these kinds of total-lame-as rationalizations.

 

[vesper]

Everyone realizes this is a kangaroo court. Apparently if you have a vagina, you aren't allowed to question the witness.

Shifty seems to have a real issue with Stefanik. She finally got her chance to speak and did an excellent job.

 

[DamnYankee]

Does someone have to be a leftist to realize that a House inquiry is not a criminal trial?
Is that a partisan issue somehow?

Yes, I know. It IS NOT a criminal trial. Obviously. However Americans do have a sense of fair play and prior impeachment proceedings allowed the accused due process.

Not with the kook left this time. They're special.

 

[trixare4kids]

This sort of excuse-making for criminal activity is just weird as well as grotesquely desperate. A crime is not negated because the victim was unaware of it the exact instant it occurred and the other idiotic claim that a crime is not committed if it's unsuccessful. It's hard to believe there could be people so stupid to make these kinds of total-lame-as rationalizations.

I've seen no evidence of a crime.
Your mileage may vary but your childish ad hom fraught in anger is duly noted.

 

[Obscurity]

Shifty seems to have a real issue with Stefanik. She finally got her chance to speak and did an excellent job.

She tried to do the typical RW tactic - Well, OBAMA!

Being concerned about the appearance of impropriety is no "bomb." Yovanovitch JUST disarmed the entire line of inquiry by stating in NO unspecific terms she would NOT advise re-opening the burisma investigation.

All this comes down to is this.

YOU lot do not accept that our institutions work, at all, and so a shadow government must be installed by trump under his direct order to act without the confines of the law.

Sad.

 

[DamnYankee]

Ironically, yes!

I think the Schiff show knows they are losing their war, and bringing the Trump tweet is simply a last ditch effort.
I fail to see how a tweet maligning the ambassador is witness intimidation since she would have had NO knowledge of it while testifying until Schiffty the clown brought it into the mix.

Yep. It can't be "witness intimidation." Like the kooker left says, this isn't a criminal trial AND how can she be intimidated when she is answering A. (Pencil Neck) Schitt's questions and not looking at Twitter. lol

 

[Obscurity]

I've seen no evidence of a crime.
Your mileage may vary but your childish ad hom fraught in anger is duly noted.

No crime is needed for an impeachment.

Now, tell me I am right.

 

[digitusmedius]

Bingo.
1) Logic lesson of the day #101

Thank you.

If Dear ****bag supporters had their way, they'd have every tweet of their Dear ****bag cofeve'd up.

 

[trixare4kids]

Yep. It can't be "witness intimidation." Like the kooker left says, this isn't a criminal trial AND how can she be intimidated when she is answering A. (Pencil Neck) Schitt's questions and not looking at Twitter. lol

Yesterday, Pelosi accused the president of a nasty crime, "bribery" and then shortly after she spit that little ditty out, she was asked when they'll be taking the impeachment vote and she said, "We haven’t even made a decision to impeach." One would think since she KNOWS Trump is guilty of bribery, a CRIME, she'd rush to take that vote.

I know and you know, an impeachment vote is not the goal, but dirtying Trump like last week's garbage, and keeping it all in the public's eye is the real agenda. The longer the Shifft-show goes on, the better they believe it will become for them. The dirtier the narrative, the better for them.
It's the only way they can win back the WH.

I think it might all backfire in their general direction. You deal dirt, it eventually comes back.

 

[trixare4kids]

If Dear ****bag supporters had their way, they'd have every tweet of their Dear ****bag cofeve'd up.

Got anything else besides your silly ad hom fails?

Please stop wasting our time.

 

[digitusmedius]

Yep. It can't be "witness intimidation." Like the kooker left says, this isn't a criminal trial AND how can she be intimidated when she is answering A. (Pencil Neck) Schitt's questions and not looking at Twitter. lol

OK, trumper. But your Dear ****bag's criming can and does continue during the impeachment. Derail FAIL, yet again.

 

[digitusmedius]

Got anything else besides your silly ad hom fails?

Please stop wasting our time.

Getting harder to prop up your Dear ****ag, trix? It seems you've given up on giving him cover and have just turned to the whine portion of your program.

 

[trixare4kids]

No crime is needed for an impeachment.

Now, tell me I am right.

Why would I tell you anything? You're attempting to muddy the waters.

Now let's go back to what I actually wrote, shall we?
Since Nancy Pelosi KNOWS Trump committed a crime, why haven't they decided yet to take that impeachment vote?

 

[Obscurity]

Why would I tell you anything? You're attempting to muddy the waters.

Now let's go back to what I actually wrote, shall we?
Since Nancy Pelosi KNOWS Trump committed a crime, why haven't they decided yet to take that impeachment vote?

Is a crime required for an impeachment to occur?

Answer.

 

[trixare4kids]

Getting harder to prop up your Dear ****ag, trix? It seems you've given up on giving him cover and have just turned to the whine portion of your program.

Getting harder not to write trollish thread replies, and derail your own thread?

This is your thread, isn't it?

 

[digitusmedius]

I've seen no evidence of a crime.
Your mileage may vary but your childish ad hom fraught in anger is duly noted.

Well, how could you with that Dear ****bag® brand of blindfold you're wearing

 

[trixare4kids]

Is a crime required for an impeachment to occur?

Answer.

Answer why you won't refute what I actually wrote?

 

[Obscurity]

Answer why you won't refute what I actually wrote?

Are. Crimes. Needed. For. Impeachment. To. Happen?

Answer.

 

[trixare4kids]

Well, how could you with that Dear ****bag® brand of blindfold you're wearing

Still off topic ad homs.

You're dismissed now.