• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pope Tells Gay Man: ‘God Made You Like This and Loves You Like This’

That makes no sense. Neither example.

Are people straight if they never have sex?

It depends on what they think about or look at when they masterbate, wouldn't you say? Sex is a natural and normal bodily function and "not having it" is not natural or "holy" if that is what you think. I personally think it is perverted to say it is a sin and the source of the Catholic church's problem with abusive priests.
 
Last edited:
Then god talks out of both sides of his mouth


Leviticus 11:9-12 King James Version (KJV)

9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.

10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:

11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.

12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Nope. You're harping on about God's dietary laws. God's MORAL LAWS have never changed. Adultery, fornication, thievery, idolatry, and gay sex, etc., are still sins.

Besides, God never demolished a seafood restaurant, unless there was one in SODOM AND GOMORRAH.

Glad to help you out.
 
Nope. You're harping on about God's dietary laws. God's MORAL LAWS have never changed. Adultery, fornication, thievery, idolatry, and gay sex, etc., are still sins.

Besides, God never demolished a seafood restaurant, unless there was one in SODOM AND GOMORRAH.

Glad to help you out.

Is there an order to these laws? Abomination is pretty clear. If I told you that what you are doing is an abomination in the eyes of god....would you say that is ok.

Face it. Your god is a hypocrite.
 
Is there an order to these laws? Abomination is pretty clear. If I told you that what you are doing is an abomination in the eyes of god....would you say that is ok.

Face it. Your god is a hypocrite.

Face it...you understand nothing about God or His Word...
 
Face it...you understand nothing about God or His Word...

The words are crystal clear. Eating shellfish is an ABOMINATION.

Satan runs Red Lobster.

You can't have it both ways
 
Is there an order to these laws? Abomination is pretty clear. If I told you that what you are doing is an abomination in the eyes of god....would you say that is ok.

Face it. Your god is a hypocrite.

Sorry, your theology belongs in the toilet.
 
LOL You can't be gay if you don't "act on it".
Wrong.
Gay/homosexual is the attraction to the same sex.
Acting on that attraction is the abomination the Bible speaks of.


You convoluted logic is typical of religious zealots who believe sexuality itself is sinful and ugly.
Your argument is as absurd as it is stupid.
And stop blaming me for what the Bible says, I didn't write it.


The old Testament say similar things about eating pork or shellfish, why don't you go on a crusade against those "abominations"?
1. iLOL I am not on a crusade nor do I need to go on one.
2. No it actually doesn't say similar things.
It says you should not eat abominations and you should not eat unclean meat as doing so makes the person temporarily unclean. Nor does it prescribe death as punishment for becoming unclean.
 
It depends on what they think about or look at when they masterbate, wouldn't you say? Sex is a natural and normal bodily function and "not having it" is not natural or "holy" if that is what you think. I personally think it is perverted to say it is a sin and the source of the Catholic church's problem with abusive priests.

So you cant even give me a straight answer.

LOL You can't be gay if you don't "act on it".

You're wrong.
 
Did you even bother to read what was posted? If you did you missed this:

"And for those who would argue that Jesus never spoke out about gay sex, there's the following:

Jesus is God (in scripture). As God, Jesus is the one who gave Moses the Leviticus law against gay sexual relations to begin with; and he’s the one who inspires all Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16), including prohibitions against gay sexual relations in Romans 1:26-27 and I Corinthians 6:9-10, etc. It’s also worth noting that Jesus didn’t mention wife beating or other sins such as pedophilia either, and there are not many folks who would argue he approved of those behaviors. So Jesus was under no obligation to reiterate the moral laws against homosexual sin that already existed, unless there were clarifications to be made."

Jesus didn't write the absurdities found in Leviticus. Men wrote that, then translated it, re translated it and changed the meaning until now we can dismiss the injunction against planting two kinds of crops in the same field, and of considering homosexuality an abomination.
 
Take it up with Excon. He quotes Leviticus as the law of God from his own mouth.

No. If you think you have a valid argument against something I say (which you clearly do not have), you take it up with me.
 
No, it just means that men have sex more. So numbers of instances alone makes the numbers higher. Not being gay...more guys having sex.

If you want to blame 'men' for not being willing to use condoms enough to protect themselves, that's fine. Has nothing to do with them being gay.

I disagree, being rather handsome myself I could have sex pretty much anytime I wanted, there were many times I'd turn down a romp in the hay so to speak. It is a fact however that homosexuals have more sex then heterosexuals, did you forget women can be homosexual too?
 
I disagree, being rather handsome myself I could have sex pretty much anytime I wanted, there were many times I'd turn down a romp in the hay so to speak. It is a fact however that homosexuals have more sex then heterosexuals, did you forget women can be homosexual too?

Yes, but you would be having sex with a woman...correct?

So that is one man having sex...not 2 :doh

And I've seen no links that lesbians have any higher incidence of any STDs.
 
With that rule of thumb, God loves pedophiles and serial killers, too...:roll:

What is the point of this? Are you saying homosexuals are as bad as serial killers and pedophiles?
 
What is the point of this? Are you saying homosexuals are as bad as serial killers and pedophiles?

No, I am saying if God makes one a homosexual He also makes one a killer or pedophile...why is that so difficult for some to comprehend?
 
Jesus didn't write the absurdities found in Leviticus. Men wrote that, then translated it, re translated it and changed the meaning until now we can dismiss the injunction against planting two kinds of crops in the same field, and of considering homosexuality an abomination.

I don't believe that. You should also do a study on the Dead Sea manuscripts so you can see what we have today is very similar to those documents. Which puts into question your claim that retranslations have hidden the original meanings.
 
The long term effects are death...1 Cor. 6:9,10

Short term effects are endless within the family and other loved ones...their acts have indeed torn families apart...destroyed relationships...

Oh, give me a ****ing break.

The reasons that have torn families apart, is due to religious fundamentalists that shun their gay children for who they are. They are the problem. Not us being gay.
 
No, I am saying if God makes one a homosexual He also makes one a killer or pedophile...why is that so difficult for some to comprehend?

Some? its ALL, every single honest, topically educated and objective rejects your lie and made up claim. they do so because its nonsense. That retarded claim has been proven wrong every time you say it LMAO
Creating a person with sexual orientation is NOT at all close to a person choosing to murder and rape.

sexual orientation =/= murder and rape.

disagree? all you gotta do is prove otherwise. so far you havent been able to produce one fact that supports your claim, not one. if you have one please do so now, we have been waiting, thanks!

its like saying the mechanic who built a car and gave it a front wheel drive, all wheel drive or rear wheel drive also created drunk driving :lamo
 
Oh, give me a ****ing break.

The reasons that have torn families apart, is due to religious fundamentalists that shun their gay children for who they are. They are the problem. Not us being gay.

So you have no inner wrestling within your own soul? Good to know...many are not as blessed as you are...
 
Back
Top Bottom