• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Police chief says call 911 on people talking racist

I take it you're not familiar with Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire. Otherwise you would have never posted something so absurd as what I quoted here.

I'm familiar with a number of very bad Supreme Court cases which originated between 1937 and 1945. A period in time when FDR replaced the entire Supreme Court with his stooges. Most of which have been over turned by subsequent courts. As Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942) was with Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), and again in City of Charleston v. The Kanawha Players (2010). Not only do you have the constitutionally protected right to call anyone any name you please, you can flip them off as well.
 
And as socialists, they are highly supportive of Trump's agenda. And they get themselves on the Republican ticket. Because they are socialists.

Why are you surprised that socialists support Trump? Or did you stupidly think that just because Trump registered as a Republican he magically became a right-wing conservative instead of the life-long socialist freak he has always been. Boy, you liberals certainly do have a penchant for self-delusion. Does it work the other way as well? If I registered as a Democrat tomorrow will I suddenly become an anti-American socialist leftist freak? How exactly does this delusion of yours work?
 
Why are you surprised that socialists support Trump? Or did you stupidly think that just because Trump registered as a Republican he magically became a right-wing conservative instead of the life-long socialist freak he has always been. Boy, you liberals certainly do have a penchant for self-delusion. Does it work the other way as well? If I registered as a Democrat tomorrow will I suddenly become an anti-American socialist leftist freak? How exactly does this delusion of yours work?

The link lists the neo-Nazis/white supremacists that ran for REPUBLICAN office across the country a couple of years ago.
 
What do the military bases have to do with Alaska having more welfare recipients per capita? Alaska has highest rate of welfare recipients in the U.S., Census says - Anchorage Daily News
Hey I’m not against welfare. Mu mother was on welfare when I was a child. I ate government cheese. But for the way you’re painting Alaskans as “right wing we pick up ourselves by our bootstraps” there sure are a lot of welfare checks being handed out.

Actually, Alaska law requires all State funding to individuals to be repaid. So anyone who receives food stamps from the State must pay them back. We tried to get them to pay back federal food stamps as well, but the courts wouldn't allow it. So it is really more of a short-term no interest loan than welfare. It is only welfare if they keep the money they didn't earn.
 
Actually, Alaska law requires all State funding to individuals to be repaid. So anyone who receives food stamps from the State must pay them back. We tried to get them to pay back federal food stamps as well, but the courts wouldn't allow it. So it is really more of a short-term no interest loan than welfare. It is only welfare if they keep the money they didn't earn.
Really? show me proof to that bizarre claim because according to this Alaska Temporary Assistance. Not a peep about repaying anything. You made that up to make it sound better about people receiving welfare In your state.
 
The link lists the neo-Nazis/white supremacists that ran for REPUBLICAN office across the country a couple of years ago.

So? Have you seen the Republican Party lately? What in your wildest imagination makes you think the Republican Party is in any way representative of the right-wing or conservatives? Last time I checked the Republican Party was spending trillions on socialist programs just as eagerly as the Democratic Party. Or did you forget that the last 3 budgets passed by Congress came with a veto-proof majority? Not to mention this unconstitutional $2 trillion boon-dongle which passed with a unanimous vote. Proving beyond any doubt that Republicans are not the right-wing conservatives you mistakenly think they are.
 
Last edited:
Really? show me proof to that bizarre claim because according to this Alaska Temporary Assistance. Not a peep about repaying anything. You made that up to make it sound better about people receiving welfare In your state.

An Alaskan's PFD check can be garnished for a variety of different reasons under AS 43.23.065, including debts owed to the State. The law originally included debts owed to the federal government as well, but the courts tossed that part out.
 
An Alaskan's PFD check can be garnished for a variety of different reasons under AS 43.23.065, including debts owed to the State. The law originally included debts owed to the federal government as well, but the courts tossed that part out.

So then it doesn't and you just lied.

:shrug:
 
It is a crime albeit a petty one in my state to direct racial epitaphs at someone

I wonder what she would say if a white person called 911 for a black person calling them a cracker?
 
I'm familiar with a number of very bad Supreme Court cases which originated between 1937 and 1945. A period in time when FDR replaced the entire Supreme Court with his stooges. Most of which have been over turned by subsequent courts. As Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942) was with Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), and again in City of Charleston v. The Kanawha Players (2010). Not only do you have the constitutionally protected right to call anyone any name you please, you can flip them off as well.

Neither of those cases overruled Chaplinsky. You're just making **** up now.

The ruling on "fighting words" stands. If you call someone a derogatory term, particularly a racial epithet, and they bloody your nose, you will not get relief from the courts on the basis of free speech.
 
Seattle's top cop urges residents to call 911 if they hear 'racist name-calling' - TheBlaze


This woman should be fired for stupidity. First, it’s not illegal, second, it’s a royal waste of police resources in the middle of a crisis.


A case Left wing political correctness going off the rails.

Washington State is no place for hate, according to a black police chief who hates those who do not support the right kind of hatred that many blacks support, like hatred for cops, hatred for Trump, hatred for white conservatives republicans, and so forth.
 
An Alaskan's PFD check can be garnished for a variety of different reasons under AS 43.23.065, including debts owed to the State. The law originally included debts owed to the federal government as well, but the courts tossed that part out.

Your claim applies to deadbeat fathers. The state can recover child support as well as welfare benefits if the absent father has assets. Many other states and the U.S. military also have such provisions.

As I researched your claim, I came across an interesting tidbit. Some people can use food stamps to purchase hunting and fishing equipment.
 
White supremacists and neo-Nazis have always leaned right, they’ve always been aligned with more conservative values. They have never been progressive. They don’t identify with progressive politics or social change. In the 1930s “Democrat” and “Republican” were opposite in the political spectrum. That all changed in the 60s with Nixon’s Southern strategy during the civil rights movement. And prior to 1918 Ford was a Republican. At the height of the KKK‘s power members were either Republican or Democrat depending on the state they lived. And don’t forget in 2018 there were several white supremacist neo-Nazis running for political office around the country and not one of them were running as a Democrat. Every one was running as a Republican. You can deny it and keep your head in the sand all you want but today’s Richard spencers, proud boys, white separatists and white racists all vote Republican if they vote.

Richard Spencer is not right wing. He supports government-run healthcare, like you. He rejects the very idea of innate individual rights, like you. Instead he believes all rights come from the state, just like a typical filthy leftist. He's a collectivist - he believes groups are the relevant moral entities, like all leftists, and that's part of why he's a racist and a nationalist.

but today’s Richard spencers, proud boys, white separatists and white racists all vote Republican if they vote.

No, they don't:

Dallas News said:
Spencer did vote for Democrats in the 2004 Dallas County primary by mail-in ballot, records show. Kerry would ultimately lose to President George W. Bush in the general election. That was also the year Dallas County Democrats began winning countywide elections after years of Republican victories.

Spencer said he voted for Kerry because he did not like Bush and what “he stood for.” When asked what he meant, Spencer said, “The war.”

'''Alt-right''' leader Richard Spencer has voted for Democrats in the past, including John Kerry
 
An Alaskan's PFD check can be garnished for a variety of different reasons under AS 43.23.065, including debts owed to the State. The law originally included debts owed to the federal government as well, but the courts tossed that part out.
that has nothing to do with alaskans “paying back food stamps”. The only way food stamps are “paid back” is because of fraud or overpayment
 
Richard Spencer is not right wing. He supports government-run healthcare, like you. He rejects the very idea of innate individual rights, like you. Instead he believes all rights come from the state, just like a typical filthy leftist. He's a collectivist - he believes groups are the relevant moral entities, like all leftists, and that's part of why he's a racist and a nationalist.



No, they don't:
Right! All those dudes carrying confederate flags and firearms at unite the right rallies yelling “unite the right” are flaming liberals.
 
Right! All those dudes carrying confederate flags and firearms at unite the right rallies yelling “unite the right” are flaming liberals.

All those ANTIFA members walking down the street assaulting people and destroying peoples property are on the left.
cheers for paintbrushes.
 
i use to get mad when people blatantly used racist terms because it's stupid.


now, i want every racist to use the same language (for example on this board) that they use at home with their spouses.



if there are any racists here can you guys PLEASE use your normal racist language so we'll all know your true selves?
 
Seattle is a hot spot of white supremacist groups. Presumably, the city has had trouble with racists inciting violence. The cops would rather have people call the police on the racists than deal with fights breaking out.

It's a call for calm. A call for law and order. A condemnation of street justice, vigilantism and physical confrontation against "neo" nazis.

Of course the alt right would like to paint this as the nazis being victims. They would also like everyone to ignore the nazi problem in that city and state. By pretending it doesn't exist, they create strawmen like "name calling" and thereby apologize for racism.

This is Seattle? 'Nuff said. It is a totalitarian city filled with elitist Starbuckers.
 
Strange because this old man when I was a kid used to get charged all the times for yelling the N word at the woman across the street from him. They prosecute it under disorderly conduct.

You said that yelling racial epitaphs was a crime in your state. Your proof is that you were charged on disorderly conduct. Maybe so, but then you weren't charged with yelling racial epitaphs because that is not a chargeable offense... ie, its not a crime.

Anymore disingenuous scoffery out there?
 
In the 1930s “Democrat” and “Republican” were opposite in the political spectrum. That all changed in the 60s with Nixon’s Southern strategy during the civil rights movement.

Oh really? So all those racist Democrats switched to Republican as you claim under the Southern Strategy myth?

If that were true, you should have no problem listing these Democrats who became Republican. The Southern Strategy myth says there were over 200 of them.

Who were these racist Democrats that swapped sides?
 
Oh really? So all those racist Democrats switched to Republican as you claim under the Southern Strategy myth?

If that were true, you should have no problem listing these Democrats who became Republican. The Southern Strategy myth says there were over 200 of them.

Who were these racist Democrats that swapped sides?

That 200 number is a ridiculous bar. Where did that number originate and why is it the standard? Unless anyone gives you 200 names it didn't happen? Please. :roll:

Secondly, I've posted information from Princeton historian Kevin Kruse before who does a fantastic job walking people through the decades long march of party and political realignment. This one he provides news articles and video from the time period starting in the 1930's. Condor certainly won't take the time to read it but anyone else interested in that period of history absolutely should.

Thread by @KevinMKruse: "Since @kanyewest's tweets have apparently made this topic unavoidable, some thoughts on the history of the parties' switch on civil rights. […]"
 
Ah, yet another liberal who can seem to grasp that the 9 military bases and 64 missile defense systems in Alaska are federally owned and not the property of the State of Alaska. Why am I not surprised? Here is a lesson in civics that you so desperately need: Just because Congress spends money in a particular State it does not mean that money goes to the State or its people. Get a clue.

So you're arguing that Alaska's high welfare rate is due to military personnel and government contractors eating all the cheese. And of course, you can support this ridiculous assertion with documentation.

Yeah, we didn't think you could.
 
That 200 number is a ridiculous bar. Where did that number originate and why is it the standard? Unless anyone gives you 200 names it didn't happen? Please. :roll:

Secondly, I've posted information from Princeton historian Kevin Kruse before who does a fantastic job walking people through the decades long march of party and political realignment. This one he provides news articles and video from the time period starting in the 1930's. Condor certainly won't take the time to read it but anyone else interested in that period of history absolutely should.

Thread by @KevinMKruse: "Since @kanyewest's tweets have apparently made this topic unavoidable, some thoughts on the history of the parties' switch on civil rights. […]"
And how many racist Dixiecrats did Nixon win for the GOP? Turns out, virtually none. Among the racist Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond of South Carolina was the sole senator to defect to the Republicans — and he did this long before Nixon’s time. Only one Dixiecrat congressman, Albert Watson of South Carolina, switched to the GOP. The rest, more than 200 Dixiecrat senators, congressmen, governors and high elected officials, all stayed in the Democratic Party.

The myth of Nixon’s ‘Southern Strategy’ | TheHill

But if that isn't good enough for you, just list 5 Dixiecrats who switched parties. That should be easy enough.
 
The overwhelming majority of Alaskans are not socialist leftists. Outside of population centers leftists aren't able to survive. They are too feeble-minded and utterly dependent on government to be able to function in the real world. So the only leftists you are likely to find in Alaska will be located in either Anchorage, Fairbanks, or Juneau and nowhere else. Even then they will be a tiny minority because Alaska does not tolerate morons for very long.

I lived in Fairbanks in the '60s. I liked Gold Nugget Days where they jailed the clean shaven men old enough to grow a beard. I wasn't old enough.
 
Back
Top Bottom