• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Parnas is right about one thing, Trump has created a serious political weapon in Barr!

The corrupt and illegal actions of the Obama administration and various people in the Trump administration...which is what is being investigated actually is relevant to the Mueller investigation. Of course, the Mueller investigation is over and done with, so nobody wants to talk about that anymore. Too bad. That travesty of justice will definitely figure into the the results of ongoing investigations.

LOL! Oh, you mean the actions that the IG report didn't find to be criminal or the other ones from Never Never Land that you can't ever seem to cite?
That judge doesn't have the power to stop an investigation. He can pound sand. Regarding his threat of releasing some documents...I say good...but release them to the public, not just to those asking for them. We don't want these document hidden from the public or cherry-picked, do we?

The link proved you have no idea what you're babbling about.

You lose. Again.
 
Whether you like it or not Obama got permission from a FISA judge for his actions. Not to mention that his predecessor GW Bush was also guilty of surveiling Americans and did not get court permission. But he was a Republican so you ignore it.



United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court - Wikipedia

No...Obama did not "get permission from a FISA judge". In fact, I'm not talking about "surveillance" at all. I'm talking about illegal searches of the NSA database.

This will tell you all about it: Top Secret FISA Court Order - President Obama Spying on Political Enemies
 
LOL! Oh, you mean the actions that the IG report didn't find to be criminal or the other ones from Never Never Land that you can't ever seem to cite?

The link proved you have no idea what you're babbling about.

You lose. Again.

It's not up to the IG to decide if anything is criminal or not.

Present the part of that link that indicates the judge can end an investigation.

I haven't lost anything.
 
It's not up to the IG to decide if anything is criminal or not.

Present the part of that link that indicates the judge can end an investigation.

I haven't lost anything.

LOL! He gave them a drop dead date. They didn't follow through.

You lose.

Again.
 
LOL! He gave them a drop dead date. They didn't follow through.

You lose.

Again.

And then what happened? Did some investigation suddenly end? Tell me all about it, eh?
 
And then what happened? Did some investigation suddenly end? Tell me all about it, eh?

Irrelevant to anything I posted. That had until a court-ordered date to charge him. They didn't.

They have no case.

You lose.

Again.
 
Irrelevant to anything I posted. That had until a court-ordered date to charge him. They didn't.

They have no case.

You lose.

Again.

You are avoiding my question because it shows your contention is utterly wrong.

There is nothing stopping the DOJ from dragging McCabe in for a criminal trial...especially nothing from that judge.
 
You are avoiding my question because it shows your contention is utterly wrong.

There is nothing stopping the DOJ from dragging McCabe in for a criminal trial...especially nothing from that judge.

You're so deliciously and hilarious uninformed about this, and proudly so.
 
You are avoiding my question because it shows your contention is utterly wrong.

There is nothing stopping the DOJ from dragging McCabe in for a criminal trial...especially nothing from that judge.

Except pesky things like precedent and evidence of harm or intent. McCabe is in the clear. That was verified by this....and the crickets since. Of course you will continue to claim he is indicted I expect. The truth s no matter how hard Barr tries there is no wrong doing worth a criminal case concerning the FBI and the Trump campaign. I will be interested in what Horowitz says about the leaks coming from the NY office that forced Comey to reveal the reopening of the email investigation 2 weeks before the vote. That is tangible damage done to an election by Trump biased FBI agents and should be prosecuted.

A change to the Justice Department’s legal stance in a suit related to former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe is prompting fresh speculation about the mysterious state of the Justice Department’s effort to prosecute McCabe over alleged misstatements to investigators about his interactions with colleagues during the 2016 election.

In a brief court filing Wednesday, Justice Department attorneys said they were no longer arguing that public release of records about McCabe would interfere with an ongoing enforcement action. That claim is typically used to withhold records about ongoing investigations or prosecutions.

Justice Department withdraws secrecy argument on McCabe files - POLITICO
 
Last edited:
Barr will find the confirmed disgrace that he's been seeking since the came back into the arena. He came in chasing money and sold his soul in that pursuit, and history will record him as another disgrace to the position of Attorney General.
Trump will again, try and claim that he barely knows Barr.... Barr himself is too consumed within his own self-servicing mentality dedicated to crafting malice, and that will be his downfall;abusing and disgracing the Office of the Attorney General, to protect a National Criminal better known as "Trump".

Barr has no concern for the damages he's done to The American World Renown Justice Department's office of the Attorney General
 
Last edited:
Except pesky things like precedent and evidence of harm or intent. McCabe is in the clear. That was verified by this....and the crickets since. Of course you will continue to claim he is indicted I expect. The truth s no matter how hard Barr tries there is no wrong doing worth a criminal case concerning the FBI and the Trump campaign. I will be interested in what Horowitz says about the leaks coming from the NY office that forced Comey to reveal the reopening of the email investigation 2 weeks before the vote. That is tangible damage done to an election by Trump biased FBI agents and should be prosecuted.



Justice Department withdraws secrecy argument on McCabe files - POLITICO

And that says nothing about their intentions to take him to trial.

Moving on...
 
You're so deliciously and hilarious uninformed about this, and proudly so.

And yet, you can't show me anything that proves me wrong.

Moving on...
 
Parnas said that people in washington have become afraid of Barr because if you say something bad or try to go after Trump. Trumpo will simply sic Barr on you and nobody, probably even the Pope has a totally clean record. So by using Barr and by having Barr willing to do so,Trump has created a serious political weapon in Barr and the DOJ. I guess GOpers and Trumpsters will say that every president has requested investigations, but none were for strictly political reasons and none that did not end up in a political firestorm for the president that initiated the investigation.

This is kind of obvious. As is the fact that the Right is fascist. So, we wait and see if they burn the US to the ground like the other fascists did with the countries they ran or if we kick the bums out before more damage can be done.

I vote for A, by the way. Fascism always wins until it implodes.
 
Lulz. You're confused yet again. You have to prove your contention valid and/or correct, and you've failed, laughably, to do you.

What contention? You are the one who is contending that the judge's ruling prevents the DOJ from indicting McCabe. You have yet to prove that.
 
What contention? You are the one who is contending that the judge's ruling prevents the DOJ from indicting McCabe. You have yet to prove that.

LOL! You can't even remember your own posts? Priceless.

The 'corruption and illegal acts' of the Obama admin that exist only in your fantasies.
 
Back
Top Bottom