• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Our Timidity is Killing the Constitution

danielpalos said:
Only the unorganized militia whines about gun control.
Click to expand...

actually liberals whine about it because, with their usual total ignorance, they imagine they can take guns away from criminals and because they don't like conservatives having guns to defend themselves against from the growing encroachments of the liberal govt.
 
danielpalos said:
Only the unorganized militia whines about gun control.
Click to expand...

Who are the "unorganized" militia

Has not it been declared that all male citizens of a certain age are deemed to be in THE militia...it was a major argument in favor of keeping the 2nd Amendment.
 
danielpalos said:
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Click to expand...

So what is the "unorganized" militia and what constitutes the "organized" militia ?



What's the difference between a militia and mob rule, of lynch mobs of vigilantes?


So can you explain the "due process" of combating crime, drugs and terror with privately owned firearms supporting a well regulated militia ?


In short, how does or how do a privately armed citizen(s), in a well regulated militia, with his/their Colt .45 tackle crime ?
Also be sure to include how "due process" and the law would fit in with your theory.
 
Rich2018 said:
So what is the "unorganized" militia and what constitutes the "organized" militia ?



What's the difference between a militia and mob rule, of lynch mobs of vigilantes?


So can you explain the "due process" of combating crime, drugs and terror with privately owned firearms supporting a well regulated militia ?


In short, how does or how do a privately armed citizen(s), in a well regulated militia, with his/their Colt .45 tackle crime ?
Also be sure to include how "due process" and the law would fit in with your theory.
Click to expand...

The common law is provided for by that legislatively thought out, statute: 10 USC 246: Militia: composition and classes.

Our Second Amendment is clear. Did you miss the first clause?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Click to expand...

The common law for the common defense. We have our Second Amendment. We don't have a general warfare clause.
 
danielpalos said:
The common law is provided for by that legislatively thought out, statute: 10 USC 246: Militia: composition and classes.

Our Second Amendment is clear. Did you miss the first clause?

The common law for the common defense. We have our Second Amendment. We don't have a general warfare clause.
Click to expand...


So what is the "unorganized" militia and what constitutes the "organized" militia ?



What's the difference between a militia and mob rule, of lynch mobs of vigilantes?


So can you explain the "due process" of combating crime, drugs and terror with privately owned firearms supporting a well regulated militia ?


In short, how does or how do a privately armed citizen(s), in a well regulated militia, with his/their Colt .45 tackle crime ?
Also be sure to include how "due process" and the law would fit in with your theory.


Secondly you said the USA doesn't have a "general" welfare clause, so what would be an example of a "general" welfare law/policy that could be objected to ?


If I understand you right, the USA has a "general" defense clause, so what would be an example of a law/policy for "common" defense that could be objected to.


Surely you're aware of two defense?welfare laws and policies ?
 
Rich2018 said:
So what is the "unorganized" militia and what constitutes the "organized" militia ?



What's the difference between a militia and mob rule, of lynch mobs of vigilantes?
Click to expand...

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
Click to expand...

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Click to expand...

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Click to expand...

There is no provision for any "militia of Individuals of the People" in our federal doctrine.
 
Rich2018 said:
So can you explain the "due process" of combating crime, drugs and terror with privately owned firearms supporting a well regulated militia ?


In short, how does or how do a privately armed citizen(s), in a well regulated militia, with his/their Colt .45 tackle crime ?
Also be sure to include how "due process" and the law would fit in with your theory.
Click to expand...

"...simply by answering the call; To the militia mobile!"
 
Rich2018 said:
So what is the "unorganized" militia and what constitutes the "organized" militia ?



What's the difference between a militia and mob rule, of lynch mobs of vigilantes?


So can you explain the "due process" of combating crime, drugs and terror with privately owned firearms supporting a well regulated militia ?


In short, how does or how do a privately armed citizen(s), in a well regulated militia, with his/their Colt .45 tackle crime ?
Also be sure to include how "due process" and the law would fit in with your theory.


Secondly you said the USA doesn't have a "general" welfare clause, so what would be an example of a "general" welfare law/policy that could be objected to ?
Click to expand...

Yes, we do have a general welfare clause simply Because our welfare clause is General, not Common or Limited.
 
danielpalos said:
"...simply by answering the call; To the militia mobile!"
Click to expand...

1. What is the "unorganized" militia and what constitutes the "organized" militia ?


2. What's the difference between a militia and mob rule, of lynch mobs of vigilantes?


3. Can you explain the "due process" of combating crime, drugs and terror with privately owned firearms supporting a well regulated militia ?


In short, how does or how do a privately armed citizen(s), in a well regulated militia, with his/their Colt .45 tackle crime ?
Also be sure to include how "due process" and the law would fit in with your theory.
 
Rich2018 said:
1. What is the "unorganized" militia and what constitutes the "organized" militia ?


2. What's the difference between a militia and mob rule, of lynch mobs of vigilantes?


3. Can you explain the "due process" of combating crime, drugs and terror with privately owned firearms supporting a well regulated militia ?


In short, how does or how do a privately armed citizen(s), in a well regulated militia, with his/their Colt .45 tackle crime ?
Also be sure to include how "due process" and the law would fit in with your theory.
Click to expand...

You are simply copying and pasting, not providing rebuttals to arguments already given.
 
danielpalos said:
You are simply copying and pasting, not providing rebuttals to arguments already given.
Click to expand...

yes he does not debate but rather finds excuses not to and then considers himself the victor. Bizarre but then again liberals find 1001 excuses not to debate because liberalism is based in pure ignorance and does not fare well in debate.
 
James972 said:
yes he does not debate but rather finds excuses not to and then considers himself the victor. Bizarre but then again liberals find 1001 excuses not to debate because liberalism is based in pure ignorance and does not fare well in debate.
Click to expand...

He seems more "conservative" than "liberal".
 
danielpalos said:
There is no provision for any "militia of Individuals of the People" in our federal doctrine.
Click to expand...

Beep bop boop word regurgitator word salad non answer. Please make a specific response to the queries, not a generalization that doesn't answer any of them.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Beep bop boop word regurgitator word salad non answer. Please make a specific response to the queries, not a generalization that doesn't answer any of them.
Click to expand...

He is begging the question. It is his made up story. Ask him to answer it. There is no appeal to ignorance of the law.
 
danielpalos said:
You are simply copying and pasting, not providing rebuttals to arguments already given.
Click to expand...

Because you are NOT answering !
You have NOT answered any of the following questions:-


1. What is the "unorganized" militia and what constitutes the "organized" militia ?


2. What's the difference between a militia and mob rule, of lynch mobs of vigilantes?


3. Can you explain the "due process" of combating crime, drugs and terror with privately owned firearms supporting a well regulated militia ?


In short, how does or how do a privately armed citizen(s), in a well regulated militia, with his/their Colt .45 tackle crime ?
Also be sure to include how "due process" and the law would fit in with your theory.
 
presluc said:
Not the first wall I've confronted in a debate. lol:peace
Click to expand...

If they refuse to answer it's because they don't have one.

In Daniel's case he has a few snippets he's come across like general and common but he has absolutely no idea how you would apply the to the real world policies and laws.

His ignorance has further shown up with his ridiculous assertion the the 2nd Amendment means the USA doesn't need a war on crime, drugs and terror.
When asked how this works, his response is "by answering the militia's call"


He is another ignorant patriot about to go on ignore along with James.
 
Rich2018 said:
If they refuse to answer it's because they don't have one.

In Daniel's case he has a few snippets he's come across like general and common but he has absolutely no idea how you would apply the to the real world policies and laws.

His ignorance has further shown up with his ridiculous assertion the the 2nd Amendment means the USA doesn't need a war on crime, drugs and terror.
When asked how this works, his response is "by answering the militia's call"


He is another ignorant patriot about to go on ignore along with James.
Click to expand...

There are many in a certain political party that does not like interrogative sentences .:peace
 
presluc said:
There are many in a certain political party that does not like interrogative sentences .:peace
Click to expand...

Would they be fond of words like "conservative" and "liberal" and "green new deal" ?


Would the mention of the "I" word send them into a frenzied tantrum ?
 
Rich2018 said:
Because you are NOT answering !
You have NOT answered any of the following questions:-


1. What is the "unorganized" militia and what constitutes the "organized" militia ?


2. What's the difference between a militia and mob rule, of lynch mobs of vigilantes?


3. Can you explain the "due process" of combating crime, drugs and terror with privately owned firearms supporting a well regulated militia ?


In short, how does or how do a privately armed citizen(s), in a well regulated militia, with his/their Colt .45 tackle crime ?
Also be sure to include how "due process" and the law would fit in with your theory.
Click to expand...

lol. you simply ignore my answers. post only one question per post. i can prove it too you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom