• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Only black reporters allowed in Mayoral race event

OlNate said:
lol...I'm hoping you read a little further and found it. ;) I know what comes next...do you?
Click to expand...

what should come next is a post that admits your other post being factually wrong . . . . but we doubt it
 
AGENT J said:
LOL

the left? where?
what double standards?

who here said they think this is OK personally and represents the left .. . .also isnt one of the candidates a republican?

ive seen people right left and center point out they dont agree and personally think this is wrong but understand the fact that a CHURCH can do this just like white churches deny black members or sometimes wont marry thier black members . . the CHURCH has that right :shrug:
Click to expand...

I'm not arguing about the church having the right or not having it. I'm pointing out what would happen if the colors were reversed and they were keeping out the black press.
 
veritas1 said:
I'm not arguing about the church having the right or not having it. I'm pointing out what would happen if the colors were reversed and they were keeping out the black press.
Click to expand...

nothing you just said changes anything lol

ill ask you again:

the left? where?
what double standards?

who here said they think this is OK personally and represents the left .. . .also isnt one of the candidates a republican?


ive seen people right left and center point out they dont agree and personally think this is wrong but understand the fact that a CHURCH can do this just like they did when white churches denied black members or sometimes wont marry thier black members . . the CHURCH has that right


so what you claim to be pointing out is pure fantasy and not based on anything solid, when it already happened in similar fashion it was the same results, most condemning the action but supporting the right

but IF anybody did think it was wrong in only one direction that person is a hypocritically moron :shrug:
 
AGENT J said:
nothing you just said changes anything lol

ill ask you again:

the left? where?
what double standards?

who here said they think this is OK personally and represents the left .. . .also isnt one of the candidates a republican?


ive seen people right left and center point out they dont agree and personally think this is wrong but understand the fact that a CHURCH can do this just like they did when white churches denied black members or sometimes wont marry thier black members . . the CHURCH has that right


so what you claim to be pointing out is pure fantasy and not based on anything solid, when it already happened in similar fashion it was the same results, most condemning the action but supporting the right

but IF anybody did think it was wrong in only one direction that person is a hypocritically moron :shrug:
Click to expand...

Right, of course. Because we all know the reaction would be exactly the same in both instances. Uh huh. Again, I'm not claiming they don't have the right. They probably do and that is not what I commented about. Any claims that the reverse scenario would be treated as this was, is simply nonsense. CNN would probably talk about it for a week all the while blaming the "atmosphere" created by Trump. We all know this. You do, too.
 
veritas1 said:
1.) Right, of course. Because we all know the reaction would be exactly the same in both instances.
2.) Uh huh. Again, I'm not claiming they don't have the right. They probably do and that is not what I commented about.
3.) Any claims that the reverse scenario would be treated as this was, is simply nonsense.
4.) CNN would probably talk about it for a week all the while blaming the "atmosphere" created by Trump. We all know this. You do, too.
Click to expand...

1.) who said exactly the same? please dont start of with retarded strawmen like that because it only makes your claim look more silly. The facts we have go against your guessing and fantasy. WHen the story was here about a white church denying black members marriage i only saw that story here and there wasnt a much different reaction soooooooo remind s again what you have besides yor fantasy?
2.) repeat this 50 times its meaningless cause no one ever said you did, its just one of muitiple strawmen you keep posting cause you cant support your claim
3.) except for the fact again that a similar case did happen and it was treated similar vs your fantasy . . ill go with evidence over your fantasy
4.) nope we do not buy into your fantasy that you have no support for, while hilarious please try to contain your unhinged meltdown :lamo . .

now stop dodging and ill ask you AGAIN LMAO

the left? where?
what double standards?

who here said they think this is OK personally and represents the left .. . .also isnt one of the candidates a republican?
 
AGENT J said:
1.) who said exactly the same? please dont start of with retarded strawmen like that because it only makes your claim look more silly. The facts we have go against your guessing and fantasy. WHen the story was here about a white church denying black members marriage i only saw that story here and there wasnt a much different reaction soooooooo remind s again what you have besides yor fantasy?
2.) repeat this 50 times its meaningless cause no one ever said you did, its just one of muitiple strawmen you keep posting cause you cant support your claim
3.) except for the fact again that a similar case did happen and it was treated similar vs your fantasy . . ill go with evidence over your fantasy
4.) nope we do not buy into your fantasy that you have no support for, while hilarious please try to contain your unhinged meltdown :lamo . .

now stop dodging and ill ask you AGAIN LMAO

the left? where?
what double standards?

who here said they think this is OK personally and represents the left .. . .also isnt one of the candidates a republican?
Click to expand...

Yes, we all know the left treats every case the same.:roll: Witness the cases of Brett Kavanaugh, the Covington kids, Jussie Smollett and numerous others. Just look at how they reacted to Trump's imaginary Russian collusion vs Hillary's clearly demonstrated Russian collusion or Trump's "obstruction of justice" vs Hillary destroying evidence subpoenaed by Congress, a clear crime. Or Trump "putting kids in cages" except they were not cages at all, were built by Obama and also first used by him. Double standard is their only standard.
 
Risky Thicket said:
Athens is a long haul from Savannah. The Banner-Herald did not send someone to Savannah to cover the "story". You didn't read the article. That or you did the best you could and then promptly shot yourself in the butt when you posted the above.

Did you read the byline? Or was it that you thought the rest of us were too stupid to know better?

The article was picked up off the AP wire. It was written by Eric Curl of the Savannah Morning News.

It wasn't a big story. It was in fact a local story that was picked up by the Athens Banner-Herald in Athens.
Click to expand...



I read the entire article. When somebody post's a story, I just click the link and start reading. I never said it was a "big" story. But....have it your way, The journalist that wrote the story for the Savannah Morning News must've missed the memo that there was "no story".

What was your point, BTW? It didn't change the story. When he wrote it, when it hit the wire, or when it was picked up by the Athens Banner-Herald. The story was still a race discrimination story. No? Or are you one of those posters that scour and parse every letter of a post just feel superior? If that's the case, congratulations! I got the byline wrong. SMH :2wave:
 
veritas1 said:
1.) Yes, we all know the left treats every case the same.:roll:
2.) Witness the cases of Brett Kavanaugh, the Covington kids, Jussie Smollett and numerous others. Just look at how they reacted to Trump's imaginary Russian collusion vs Hillary's clearly demonstrated Russian collusion or Trump's "obstruction of justice" vs Hillary destroying evidence subpoenaed by Congress, a clear crime. Or Trump "putting kids in cages" except they were not cages at all, were built by Obama and also first used by him. Double standard is their only standard.
Click to expand...

1.) aaaand another retarded strawman that nobody said
2.) which one of those are about church rights and had all of the left or right leaning the same way??? oh thats right . . none:lamo

LMAO I love it! here we are in the same spot, theres nothing supporting your claims and you are still high tailing it, dodging and running from my questions. your lies and biased are failing bad.


ill ask you again

the left? where?
what double standards?

who here said they think this is OK personally and represents the left .. . .also isnt one of the candidates a republican?

:popcorn2:
 
 
Last edited:
ecofarm said:
Normal or educated white people don't get upset. It's not supremacist.
Click to expand...

Well, let's test that out then...

Do you believe in racial equality?
Do you support racial discrimination?

My answers are unwavering... they are Yes to the first question and No to the second one.

.
 
AGENT J said:
1.) aaaand another retarded strawman that nobody said
2.) which one of those are about church rights and had all of the left or right leaning the same way??? oh thats right . . none:lamo

LMAO I love it! here we are in the same spot, theres nothing supporting your claims and you are still high tailing it, dodging and running from my questions. your lies and biased are failing bad.


ill ask you again

the left? where?
what double standards?

who here said they think this is OK personally and represents the left .. . .also isnt one of the candidates a republican?

:popcorn2:
Click to expand...

Right, of course. Naturally, this case won't be trumpeted in the media because the colors are not reversed. Of course, the left doesn't care or is ambivalent here. White guys are being kept out.
 
Here is yet another great video on the subject of Racism, Power, and ALL voices being allowed to have their say:




-
 
Grim17 said:
Well, let's test that out then...

Do you believe in racial equality?
Do you support racial discrimination?

My answers are unwavering... they are Yes to the first question and No to the second one.

.
Click to expand...

A handful of alt-right, racists and the like misinterpret this as racism for self serving purpose.

Stop trying to pretend normal people have a problem with it.
 
ecofarm said:
A handful of alt-right, racists and the like misinterpret this as racism for self serving purpose.

Stop trying to pretend normal people have a problem with it.
Click to expand...

Can't answer the questions... No surprise there.

You can't answer those 2 very simple questions because doing so either a) destroys your entire argument, or b) makes you look foolish.

Yup... You definitely need to get your money back because the college you attended ripped you off BIG TIME.

.
 
veritas1 said:
Right, of course. Naturally, this case won't be trumpeted in the media because the colors are not reversed. Of course, the left doesn't care or is ambivalent here. White guys are being kept out.
Click to expand...

LMAO and the dodging and meltdown continues:lamo

ill ask you again

the left? where?
what double standards?

who here said they think this is OK personally and represents the left .. . .also isnt one of the candidates a republican?
 
Grim17 said:
Tell that to ecofarm... He sees things quite differently.
Click to expand...

doesnt matter how anybody "sees" things, all that matters are facts
 
OlNate said:
:lamo Ok, I lied, YOU actually have the sharpest knife with which to split hairs. (PS: I'm complimenting you).

I will admit, that is a formula that makes total sense. Except you have no idea if that's the correct conclusion in this case, because if you don't know if you have all the variables. Because no one has commented.

Let's get away from the OP for a sec, and dally in something a little less controversial.

Scenario A) Woman A, who has (________________), does not feel comfortable being examined by a male doctor, and insists on a female doctor. Therefore she is sexist.

Ok...that makes sense, given the sentence, if we assume the blank is "a lump in her breast" or "had bad experiences with men" etc.

However, if the blank actually is "just been raped", do we call her sexist? No. Of course not.

This is why smart folks wait for details before making up their mind what happened.
Click to expand...

I didn't think you lied. You simply used limited information.

I simply added my point of view using additional words and their definitions. Thank you.

The example you have given is not controversial at all.

It is a private matter between Doctor and Patient.

A Patient can choose a Doctor for any reason no explanation is necessary.

Besides that, you are using a private situation versus a public situation.

The public situation was the political promotion of a particular Mayor by a Church.

What made it controversial was the exclusion of White Reporters in favor of Black Reporters.

Smart folks do further research on their own and find and provide additional information.

Which I did provide in a post that you may have missed.

Do you have any information about the incumbent Mayor? I do. I will provide it again...

Eddie Deloach - Wikipedia

When he won the election for Mayor of Savannah in 2015, he became the first conservative Mayor in the city in more than 20 years. After becoming Mayor Of Savannah, DeLoach was voted "Best Conservative" by Connect Savannah in 2016

City votes for change: DeLoach defeats Jackson to become new Savannah mayor - News - Savannah Morning News - Savannah, GA

Savannah will have a new mayor and three new city aldermen next year.

Eddie DeLoach defeated Savannah Mayor Edna Jackson in Tuesday’s municipal runoff after running a campaign centered largely on the rise in crime in the city during her administration.

DeLoach received 53 percent of the vote to unseat Jackson and earn his place as the head of the Savannah City Council, with all precincts reporting.

In addition, Bill Durrence defeated Savannah Alderwoman Mary Osborne to secure the District 2 seat with 63 percent of the vote. Brian Foster will also join the council after receiving 53 percent of the vote in his run against Alicia Blakely for the alderman at-large, post 2 seat.

List of mayors of Savannah, Georgia - Wikipedia

Eddie Deloach 2016 Incumbent Republican (first term)

Additional information concerning this Mayor election news story.

The current Mayor of Savannah, Georgia

List of mayors of Savannah, Georgia - Wikipedia

Eddie Deloach 2016 Incumbent Republican (first term)

Eddie Deloach - Wikipedia

When he won the election for Mayor of Savannah in 2015, he became the first conservative Mayor in the city in more than 20 years. After becoming Mayor Of Savannah, DeLoach was voted "Best Conservative" by Connect Savannah in 2016

City votes for change: DeLoach defeats Jackson to become new Savannah mayor - News - Savannah Morning News - Savannah, GA

Savannah will have a new mayor and three new city aldermen next year.

Eddie DeLoach defeated Savannah Mayor Edna Jackson in Tuesday’s municipal runoff after running a campaign centered largely on the rise in crime in the city during her administration.

DeLoach received 53 percent of the vote to unseat Jackson and earn his place as the head of the Savannah City Council, with all precincts reporting.

In addition, Bill Durrence defeated Savannah Alderwoman Mary Osborne to secure the District 2 seat with 63 percent of the vote. Brian Foster will also join the council after receiving 53 percent of the vote in his run against Alicia Blakely for the alderman at-large, post 2 seat.

Roseann:)
 
TheParser said:
Actually, it is VERY easy to believe.

And things will get only worse in the coming years.
Click to expand...

Race relations were as good as i had ever seen in my life during the Bush years, then Obama came along and racialized most everything and into that toxic atmosphere came 2016 and the MSM hysteria.
 
AGENT J said:
uhm inside a church? they can do what they want inside the church within reason LMAO this is a non-story just like the stories on the white churches that wont marry blacks ...
theres no illegal discrimination in either case :shrug:
Click to expand...

Sorry, Mayoral functions are not private.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom