• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

OMG... Is this creepy or what?

:lamo
 
Yes, Strzok is a creepy dude. If only that were a crime...
 
Geoist said:
Yes, Strzok is a creepy dude. If only that were a crime...
Click to expand...

Wow, please not because that would mean that great parts of the current administration and a good portion of the senate/congress (from both parties) would end up in jail.

But the first 3 to go to jail are Don jr. and Eric Trump and Bannon, :shock: what a bunch of creeps those three are.
 
I actually found it on a 2 hour and 17 minute YouTube video of the hearing.

If anyone thinks it isn't real, that video will put those doubts to rest.

.
 
Grim17 said:
You have to see it to believe it.... It's a short video clip of Peter Strzok from Thursday's congressional hearing.

At first I thought it couldn't be real, but apparently it is, and... well...

https://twitter.com/Hollybowie/status/1017551128014225413


.
Click to expand...

I watched the entire hearing. This is nothing more than edited, photoshopped idiocy by partisan... or Russian... idiots. What the hell is wrong with you, putting this crap from Twitter out as some kind of actual truth??
 
Grim17 said:
I actually found it on a 2 hour and 17 minute YouTube video of the hearing.

If anyone thinks it isn't real, that video will put those doubts to rest.

.
Click to expand...

Of course, a three-second edited clip of a 10-hour hearing is clearly "real" and indicative of what went on the other 9 hours and 58 minutes. Are Americans as a people really this gullible, naive, and easily manipulated??
 
DiAnna said:
Of course, a three-second edited clip of a 10-hour hearing is clearly "real" and indicative of what went on the other 9 hours and 58 minutes. Are Americans as a people really this gullible, naive, and easily manipulated??
Click to expand...

Yes. :mrgreen:
 
Grim17 said:
I actually found it on a 2 hour and 17 minute YouTube video of the hearing.

If anyone thinks it isn't real, that video will put those doubts to rest.

.
Click to expand...

Where is that on the full 10 hour video?
 
Grim17 said:
You have to see it to believe it.... It's a short video clip of Peter Strzok from Thursday's congressional hearing.

At first I thought it couldn't be real, but apparently it is, and... well...

https://twitter.com/Hollybowie/status/1017551128014225413


.
Click to expand...


Yeah, Strzok is an odd guy. At first I thought it was altered slightly but you can tell by the man behind him, who's turning his head, that it's legit.

Who does that?

Ick.
 
DiAnna said:
I watched the entire hearing. This is nothing more than edited, photoshopped idiocy by partisan... or Russian... idiots. What the hell is wrong with you, putting this crap from Twitter out as some kind of actual truth??
Click to expand...

Sorry, but it isn't edited... That's what makes it so damned creepy.

.
 
DiAnna said:
Of course, a three-second edited clip of a 10-hour hearing is clearly "real" and indicative of what went on the other 9 hours and 58 minutes. Are Americans as a people really this gullible, naive, and easily manipulated??
Click to expand...

Huh?

When did I say it was "indicative of what went on the other 9 hours and 58 minutes" of the hearing? It is what it is, a brief clip of the man acting creepy as hell and if that bothers you, then maybe you should talk to someone about it.

.
 
Yea, he's definitely a little weird.
 
haymarket said:
Anyone who mistakenly thinks this is important or significant or telling has truly lost their harmonica.
Click to expand...

Important... No. Creepy as hell... Most definitely.

That's the kind of look that can haunt a person in their nightmares. lol

.
 
DiAnna said:
I watched the entire hearing. This is nothing more than edited, photoshopped idiocy by partisan... or Russian... idiots. What the hell is wrong with you, putting this crap from Twitter out as some kind of actual truth??
Click to expand...

I think an apology or retraction is in order for accusing me of posting a manipulated, "photoshopped" clip that wasn't real. Based on our past encounters, I'm not very hopeful you'll do the right thing here, but we'll see.

.
 
DiAnna said:
Of course, a three-second edited clip of a 10-hour hearing is clearly "real" and indicative of what went on the other 9 hours and 58 minutes. Are Americans as a people really this gullible, naive, and easily manipulated??
Click to expand...

Grim, the self appointed champion of unbiased media, has taken the bait and in doing so is promoting fake news and biased media. Pot & kettle.
 
Grim17 said:
You have to see it to believe it.... It's a short video clip of Peter Strzok from Thursday's congressional hearing.

At first I thought it couldn't be real, but apparently it is, and... well...

https://twitter.com/Hollybowie/status/1017551128014225413


.
Click to expand...

I find it sooooo ironic that the Trumpsters constantly attack people based on their looks. Strzok. Trudeau. Hillary. Fiorina. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones and yet they yell at media for putting out unflattering pictures of Mr. Swampy. They yell at media for whining about Melania's high heels. They yell at comedians for constantly making fun of Eric. Then they yell at regular citizens who make fun of Mr. Swampy's hair, weight, and super genius big brain... The hypocrisy will never cease to amaze me.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
I find it sooooo ironic that the Trumpsters constantly attack people based on their looks. Strzok. Trudeau. Hillary. Fiorina. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones and yet they yell at media for putting out unflattering pictures of Mr. Swampy. They yell at media for whining about Melania's high heels. They yell at comedians for constantly making fun of Eric. Then they yell at regular citizens who make fun of Mr. Swampy's hair, weight, and super genius big brain... The hypocrisy will never cease to amaze me.
Click to expand...

I am not a Trump supporter, and this is not one of the thousands of threads bashing Trump... So take your meds, be on time at your therapy session and move along.

.
 
late said:
Who has an emotional response to people that destroyed your career and reputation without just cause.

Yeah, that's a toughy.
Click to expand...

Without just cause... LMMFAO.
 
Risky Thicket said:
Grim, the self appointed champion of unbiased media, has taken the bait and in doing so is promoting fake news and biased media. Pot & kettle.
Click to expand...

Sorry sir, but I am not the media, nor was the person who discovered and posted that creepy ass clip.

Since it is 100% real, could you explain how exactly it qualifies as "fake news"?

.
 
Grim17 said:
You have to see it to believe it.... It's a short video clip of Peter Strzok from Thursday's congressional hearing.

At first I thought it couldn't be real, but apparently it is, and... well...

https://twitter.com/Hollybowie/status/1017551128014225413


.
Click to expand...

He did a fairly good job of arguing except that he was grasping at straws. His mannerisms were of a man under intense pressure. I sensed a couple of times he almost cracked. The poor bastard had an FBI lawyer at his side rather than his own. There is no attorney client privilege here. That lawyer was there to protect the FBI's interests by keeping the path of inquiry as narrow as possible. He's smart enough to have wanted to engage his own lawyer, but the FBI convinced him they were looking out for him.. until they aren't. Strzok looked like a man who was ****ed and new it, just not sure when and where the ****ing was coming from.

The mannerism shown in the clip is indicative of an infantile response when he accepted no matter what he said, he was going to be indicted eventually and his "lawyer" was not there to protect him, but the FBI. He was unable to argue "classified" "facts" or any other avenues to save his skin with "his lawyer" acting as an FBI witness against him if they choose.

So it was a good show, not well managed by the Republicans, but he expertly managed his consistent denials of the validity of the evidence against him. Which plays well on TV, but either way it's BOHICA time for Strzok. The facts are already in the cake. This was a show for the partisans.

It reminded me a lot of DP arguments here. People talk past each other, flame, troll, bait, and more loudly argue weak positions they should climb down from and dont'. And nothing changes, nothing is solved, nothing is learned.
 
HowardBThiname said:
Yeah, Strzok is an odd guy. At first I thought it was altered slightly but you can tell by the man behind him, who's turning his head, that it's legit.

Who does that?

Ick.
Click to expand...

I also found his affect strange. He went from preening and bloviating to being downright giddy and defiant.
Quite the catch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom