Where did you hear that?
Did you follow the testimony?
did you?
no witness has offered evidence of quid pro quo.
in fact when asked specifically sondland said that he was never told. he simply guessed. his guess was not based on facts or evidence or that someone
told him that it was based on quid pro quo he simply just assumed that it was.
yet when he directly asked the president what he wanted from ukraine the president told him nothing not quid pro quo.
volker and other testified to the same thing no quid pro quo.
within 30 seconds yovanovitch testified no bribery or any other illegal activities that she knew of from the president.
so the question is did you listen to the testimony? i guess not. that or in true leftist fashion you simply disregarded
anything factual and believed what you wanted to believe.
Chris Stewart takedown of Yovanovitch shows Democrats have '''no case,''' GOP says | Fox News
Stewart: "I would now feel compelled to ask you, Madam Ambassador, as you sit here before us, very simply and directly, do you have any information regarding the president of the United States accepting any bribes?"
Yovanovitch: "No."
Stewart: "Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the United States has been involved with at all?"
Yovanovitch: "No."
Now democrats are changing charges based on focus groups of which words sound worse. lmao.
taylor admitted that none of the conversations that he was a part of was linkage discussed.
taylor admitted that he never talked to the president or zelensky.
zelensky has basically said that there was no quid pro quo.
how are you missing all of this and how do you not know it?