Newest Mueller Prosecutor Donated To Hillary Clinton

[JoeTrumps]

Obstruction of justice is a crime.

Like when Bill Clinton lied under oath. I notice he didn't do any jail time. but keep living in a fantasy world where that charge takes down Trump. It's sad and funny.

 

[Deuce]

Like when Bill Clinton lied under oath. I notice he didn't do any jail time. but keep living in a fantasy world where that charge takes down Trump. It's sad and funny.

I never said I think it will take down Trump. Trump will serve his full term because the GOP will not convict a Republican.

 

[Parrish]

Evidently, some posters think that a career agent, FBI or CIA and DOJ employee can't separate their oaths to the US Constitution and their political views, whatever their party identity, prove their own inability to uphold the ideals of what our country stands for and their willingness to subvert our government.

 

[cabse5]

Ahem...

Mueller - Republican

Ahem. Mueller - NeverTrumper.

 

[cabse5]

And you can support that ignorant partisan bull crap <that Mueller is partisan> with what proof?

Mueller won't investigate this <Hillary's email thing> because it has nothing to do with the Trump administration.

the funny thing is that his <Mueller's> orders are not specific to the trump campaign.

I think Russian collusion was one of the topics to investigate.:roll: Well, there's the Steele dossier. There's the Hillary campaign colluding with a former UK spy who had Russians provide, ahem, information on Trump. There's the 'possibility' that some of Hillary's emails got into the hands of Russia or any other foreign country. There's how lax the DOJ was in investigating the email scandal compared to the Russian collusion with the Trump campaign 'scandal'.

Do you need anymore proof that Mueller's team is only interested in prosecuting the Trump campaign? Hum?

 

[cabse5]

I never said I think it will take down Trump. Trump will serve his full term because the GOP will not convict a Republican.

You don't think the GOP will impeach any political figure regardless of the political affiliation? I'm sorry. You're projecting your own intent that you would never want to impeach a progressive.

 

[cabse5]

Obstruction of justice is a crime.

Firing a bad employee isn't.

 

[Floridafan]

I think Russian collusion was one of the topics to investigate.:roll: Well, there's the Steele dossier. There's the Hillary campaign colluding with a former UK spy who had Russians provide, ahem, information on Trump. There's the 'possibility' that some of Hillary's emails got into the hands of Russia or any other foreign country. There's how lax the DOJ was in investigating the email scandal compared to the Russian collusion with the Trump campaign 'scandal'.

Do you need anymore proof that Mueller's team is only interested in prosecuting the Trump campaign? Hum?

You are very good at spewing right wing talking points, which as you know, none of them are true.

 

[cabse5]

You are very good at spewing right wing talking points, which as you know, none of them are true.

The email investigation by the DOJ wasn't lax? The Steele dossier isn't collusion with a former UK spy and collusion with Russian informants? There's no possibility that some of Hillary's emails got into the hands of foreign powers? That Russian collusion wasn't one of the topics Mueller's team was to investigate? Which ones aren't true, again?:roll:

 

[Floridafan]

The email investigation by the DOJ wasn't lax? The Steele dossier isn't collusion with a former UK spy and collusion with Russian informants? There's no possibility that some of Hillary's emails got into the hands of foreign powers? That Russian collusion wasn't one of the topics Mueller's team was to investigate? Which ones aren't true, again?:roll:

All of them.

 

[cabse5]

All of them.

Is black now white, too?

 

[Floridafan]

Is black now white, too?

Only in your right wing world. You will tell any lie you can to save this president from his well deserved fate.

 

[code1211]

True -- I believe Trump supporters and the GOP in general would have a lot more faith in this investigation if there were way more republicans on the team -- or at least let Trump appoint the investigators himself -- then it would be more fair.

What would make me feel better includes the DOJ and the FBI fulfilling the FOIA requests made by the Congress for the documentation to support the Witch Hunt.

We have a gang of jack booted thugs performing a bloodless coup. Bloodless in fact. However, lives are being ruined, reputations are are being undone and family members are being threatened for effect.

This is a disgrace.

 

[code1211]

Do you think it was a mistake for the DOJ to appoint a long time Republican law enforcement official such as Mueller to be special counsel? Ken Starr would have been a great choice -- he has experience and he is still to this day, a very loyal Republican

Do you have a listing of the candidates for whom Mueller has voted?

Regardless of that, being a registered member of either Political Party pretty much places him in opposition to Trump.

 

[biff_poindexter]

What would make me feel better includes the DOJ and the FBI fulfilling the FOIA requests made by the Congress for the documentation to support the Witch Hunt.

We have a gang of jack booted thugs performing a bloodless coup. Bloodless in fact. However, lives are being ruined, reputations are are being undone and family members are being threatened for effect.

This is a disgrace.

They should all be arrested and tried for treason -- and if guilty(which we already know they are) -- they should be executed.

If not, then stop using terms like "jack booted thugs" -- "bloodless coups" etc, all of that hyperbole hurts your argument.

 

[code1211]

They should all be arrested and tried for treason -- and if guilty(which we already know they are) -- they should be executed.

If not, then stop using terms like "jack booted thugs" -- "bloodless coups" etc, all of that hyperbole hurts your argument.

Why do you suppose the folks involved in the investigation are not providing the documents requested by the civilians in our legislature making the legally binding requests to see them?

It seems odd that they do not do so.

When people are hiding stuff, it makes me think they're hiding stuff. What dies it make you think?

 

[poweRob]

Ahem. Mueller - NeverTrumper.

You know absolutely nothing about Mueller's politics. All you have is conspiracy theory guessing.

 

[prometeus]

I think Russian collusion was one of the topics to investigate.:roll: Well, there's the Steele dossier. There's the Hillary campaign colluding with a former UK spy who had Russians provide, ahem, information on Trump. There's the 'possibility' that some of Hillary's emails got into the hands of Russia or any other foreign country. There's how lax the DOJ was in investigating the email scandal compared to the Russian collusion with the Trump campaign 'scandal'.

Do you need anymore proof that Mueller's team is only interested in prosecuting the Trump campaign? Hum?

So you have nothing but partisan talking points and irrelevant crap.

 

[Deuce]

You don't think the GOP will impeach any political figure regardless of the political affiliation? I'm sorry. You're projecting your own intent that you would never want to impeach a progressive.

I think the current GOP will not impeach a Republican, correct. After they see the fallout in 2018 and 2020 they might change but that will be after another election, therefore Donny finishes this term.

 

[Deuce]

Firing a bad employee isn't.

Firing a bad employee specifically to impede an investigation is.

 

[Cardinal]

You would think Mueller would at least try to make it look like the investigation isn't rigged. Obviously, Mueller thinks he's untouchable.

Isn't it illegal to donate to Hillary Clinton's campaign? I'm pretty sure it is.

 

[Deuce]

The email investigation by the DOJ wasn't lax? The Steele dossier isn't collusion with a former UK spy and collusion with Russian informants? There's no possibility that some of Hillary's emails got into the hands of foreign powers? That Russian collusion wasn't one of the topics Mueller's team was to investigate? Which ones aren't true, again?:roll:

Investigating Russians is not colluding with Russians. Jesus. Do you accuse cops of colluding with drug dealers because they ask the drug dealers questions?

 

[iguanaman]

Why do you suppose the folks involved in the investigation are not providing the documents requested by the civilians in our legislature making the legally binding requests to see them?

It seems odd that they do not do so.

When people are hiding stuff, it makes me think they're hiding stuff. What dies it make you think?

Yet all the hiding of Russian contacts by Trump people doesn't make you think they are hiding something? Congress is not allowed to politicize the Judicial branch. It must be allowed to do it's job unfettered.

 

[cabse5]

Investigating Russians is not colluding with Russians. Jesus. Do you accuse cops of colluding with drug dealers because they ask the drug dealers questions?

What is this investigating of Russians that you refer my post to?

 

[code1211]

Yet all the hiding of Russian contacts by Trump people doesn't make you think they are hiding something? Congress is not allowed to politicize the Judicial branch. It must be allowed to do it's job unfettered.

People in all sectors have been trying to find the Russians who helped Trump since Trump descended the escalator in Trump Tower to announce.

Are you seriously saying that all of the bottom feeders trying to find the mythic Russians are being stopped by Trump?

Interesting choice of words in using "unfettered". That is what the judge that rebuked the Mueller team, and thereby the DOJ, said they should not be.

The Congress is not trying to do anything to the Judicial Branch. The DOJ is a part of the Executive Branch. The Judicial Branch seems to be equally frustrated by the DOJ.

It almost makes you think the DOJ is acting extra legally.