• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Newest Mueller Prosecutor Donated To Hillary Clinton

Im sorry i guess everyone would be satisfied if Mueller only had republicans to work with him on collusion .. I really love the Republicans when black lives matter talked about the police doing bad things it was a joke and waste of time also everyone backed the police .. now when trump slanders and talks about the FBI and DOJ being corrupt and doing things they should not be doing and after him ...that is quite ok... lol lol lol give me a break

There are tons of things that suddenly turn out to be just fine:
- Evangelicals are just fine with one of the most corrupt men any of them will ever run into because of Trump's stand on abortion...
- The entire Right appears to be just fine with Rudy outing our efforts with regard to the three US citizens we are trying to get released from N. Korea and nobody gives a rats behind because Rudy is only "trying to protect Saint Donald" and who cares if Rudy guns down three prosecutors in the process. "Its only justice isn't it"

We are a laughing stock. But for some of us it just does not matter.
 
George W. Bush appointed Norman Mineta, Democrat, as his Secretary of Transportation who served from 2001 to 2006. He appointed several Democrats to judgeships. He and Bill Clinton were pretty cozy in the lead up to the 2016 primaries frequently being interviewed and photographed together and described as having become friends in their post presidential years. But I am pretty sure Mueller was a Republican when Bush appointed him FBI Director in 2001. I don't know what his political leanings are now. Registering for a political party is not necessarily a lifetime commitment.


for most it is, and I switched parties in the late 80s
 
for most it is, and I switched parties in the late 80s

I switched parties in the 1980's only because the Democratic Party left me. But I know people who change parties according to who is their boss or who heads the department they work in or who the mayor or governor is.
 
Did Clinton go to jail? Was he removed from office?

Did he work for a Democrat? That is the criteria you have stated. Anyone who ever gave money or took money from a Democrat is tainted. Right?
 
Attorneys that are any good are equally adept at arguing either side of a matter. They have to be because the same body of evidence, codified law and precedent is available to both plaintiffs and defendants. Thus to mount the strongest possible defense, defense attorney must look at the available information and anticipate what sound/cogent assertions (because fallacious ones will fall to objection) the prosecution will make using the available information. Similarly, strong prosecutors must look at the same body of information and identify the plausible sound/cogent rebuttals to their arguments/assertions. An attorney's political affiliation has no impact on the soundness/cogency of his/her assertions and arguments.

Trump chose Flood because he believes him to be the most capable attorney available for the type of representation Trump will require of him. That's same approach anyone uses in selecting an attorney.

Of course that is true. How many lawyers have defended a President in an impeachment trial? Trump knows that is nearly a certainty and I'm glad he has a competent lawyer to defend him. The same criteria applies to the prosecution and to say that a man who gave money to a Democrat is automatically biased against Republicans is insulting and patently false. What it appears like is that the only "fair" prosecutor is one that looks the other way at law breaking. It also appears that even Trump supporters know Trump is guilty.
 
Last edited:
I switched parties in the 1980's only because the Democratic Party left me. But I know people who change parties according to who is their boss or who heads the department they work in or who the mayor or governor is.


If you and any dem bones, you'd still be a dem,'cause the GOP is now to the right of Attila the Hun. I don 't know anyone who changes parties because of who their boss is, or who their mayor is, and I've been on this earth for 67 years. There are dems who voted for Trump because of his populist message which was a scam from the gitgo. In my view, right wing populism is an oxymoron.
 
If you and any dem bones, you'd still be a dem,'cause the GOP is now to the right of Attila the Hun. I don 't know anyone who changes parties because of who their boss is, or who their mayor is, and I've been on this earth for 67 years. There are dems who voted for Trump because of his populist message which was a scam from the gitgo. In my view, right wing populism is an oxymoron.

You don't have to be in government or government institutions very long to understand how the game is played.
 
Mueller won't investigate this because it has nothing to do with the Trump administration.

the funny thing is that his orders are not specific to the trump campaign.
 
Gee wiz, I sympathize.

White House/Trump - Republican
Congress - Republican
Attorney General Sessions - Republican
FBI Director Wray - Republican
Former FBI Director Comey - Republican
Deputy FBI Director Rosenstein - Republican

Ahem...

Mueller - Republican
 
Trump supporters would have more faith in this sham of an investigation by Mueller's team if Mueller's team wasn't so corrupt. Mueller's team never had the pretense of being out for justice. Instead out for prosecutions.
And you can support that ignorant partisan bull crap with what proof?
 
You would think Mueller would at least try to make it look like the investigation isn't rigged. Obviously, Mueller thinks he's untouchable.

lol....since when is it wrong to support a presidential candidate? :roll:
 
Impeachment isn't polling well. You don't hear Democrats screaming for impeachment as much as they were a few months ago.
Probably because nobody wants another asshole like Pence as President.
 
You mean the ones written by Trump and Co?

You shower with him or just reach in his pants?

That you make up ignorant partisan crap. Everybody knows that.

Comey admitted in his testimony Trump was never a target.
Last month Mueller told Trump's lawyer's he's not a target.
Nothing in the questions point to anything involving Russian collusion and Trump.

Someone here's is being ignorant and partisan. I'm not at liberty to say who unfortunately.
 
Comey admitted in his testimony Trump was never a target.
Last month Mueller told Trump's lawyer's he's not a target.
Nothing in the questions point to anything involving Russian collusion and Trump.

Someone here's is being ignorant and partisan. I'm not at liberty to say who unfortunately.
This irrelevant crap has nothing to do with what I posted in replying to your drivel. But it does prove something.
 
This irrelevant crap has nothing to do with what I posted in replying to your drivel. But it does prove something.

yep. You are going to be totally blindsided again when Trump comes through all this. I guess Hillary getting her political ass kicked into the forest wasn't enough to wake up the left to how screwed they are. They need another lesson. Glad I'll be here to witness it.t
 
yep. You are going to be totally blindsided again when Trump comes through all this.
Meaning what? That he will not be indicted or impeached? I never said that he would be, that is simply not realistic or even desirable. That asshole Pence would actually be worse.

I guess Hillary
Who gives a crap? Spare me the usual ignorant drivel.
 
Of course that is true. How many lawyers have defended a President in an impeachment trial? Trump knows that is nearly a certainty and I'm glad he has a competent lawyer to defend him. The same criteria applies to the prosecution and to say that a man who gave money to a Democrat is automatically biased against Republicans is insulting and patently false. What it appears like is that the only "fair" prosecutor is one that looks the other way at law breaking. It also appears that even Trump supporters know Trump is guilty.

It appears too that they're insouciant about the possibility of his being so. That, frankly, is more disconcerting than is that Trump be so.


He was so terrible that he was no longer terrible, only dehumanized.
-- F. Scott Fitzgerald, Tender is the Night
 
You would think Mueller would at least try to make it look like the investigation isn't rigged. Obviously, Mueller thinks he's untouchable.

Apdst believes only Trump donors are allowed to investigate Trump.
 
yep. You are going to be totally blindsided again when Trump comes through all this. I guess Hillary getting her political ass kicked into the forest wasn't enough to wake up the left to how screwed they are. They need another lesson. Glad I'll be here to witness it.t

Post again in november
 
Comey admitted in his testimony Trump was never a target.
Last month Mueller told Trump's lawyer's he's not a target.
Nothing in the questions point to anything involving Russian collusion and Trump.

Someone here's is being ignorant and partisan. I'm not at liberty to say who unfortunately.

Obstruction of justice is a crime.
 
As noted before, if Jarred and Ivanka were chosen to investigate, Trump supporters would find fault.
 
Post again in november

What does that mean? When Obama won in 2008 the Democrats got their asses handed to them in 2010. Did that stop Obama from winning reelection?

Long story short: you will win the battle but lose the war.
 
Back
Top Bottom