• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nearly two-thirds of voters think Trump committed crimes before taking office, poll finds

You did not show my mistake, since I did not make a mistake.
Of course I did, you just lack either the integrity or the knowledge to admit it. Perhaps both. Pelosi can not become President as a result of impeachments.
 
Of course I did, you just lack either the integrity or the knowledge to admit it. Perhaps both. Pelosi can not become President as a result of impeachments.

How do you figure, Speaker of the House is 3rd in line, if the President and Vice President are both impeached.....she's next.
 
You would argue incorrectly. Also, Trump doesn’t even understand the Constitution, because he’s ignorant. Obama has a law degree.


In constitutional law no less...

What is trumps in, cocaine connoisseurship...
 
Must have been reading up on those conspiracy theories again. Have you heard we're taking your hamburgers and eating children. Ketchup???

conspiracy theory are you talking about?
 
According to you - laws for different people are not punished the same Trump can lie til the cows come home and it's a big snoozefest. Anyone on the other side?? Off with their heads.

Can you give me an example of the law against lies you are talking about?
 
Yes and people who vote for a criminal are abetting crime. The incoming Democrat government will, I am sure, bring to justice all Trump voters and send them to jail. But is this enough? Should not those who did not vote at all but would have voted Trump if they had voted at all also be punished- perhaps with a mild sentence of only 5 years? That will show how much Democrats value democracy.

It is certain that when in power the Democrats will reward the honest folk who voted for Mrs Clinton with $10,000 each - oh, why be stingy, let's make it $100,000.

Ummm, no. We have a legal system that can be pretty unjust, but we aren't that bad.
 
I'm very curious...since you didn't vote for either, would you be defending Clinton to this same degree if she had won?

I would defend her from nonsense. I defended Obama from nonsense. I wouldn't defend her just to defend her. I don't defend Trump just to defend him. But, it is rather obvious the left and the left leaning MSM have been out to get Trump from day one.
 
At the same time? You been smoking?

Are you saying it can't happen?

Ok, impeach Trump.......so Pence is President, he has to nominate a VP that has to be confirmed, if he's impeached before that happens, the Speaker of the House takes over....

And you are trying to lecture others on the constitution?? Cmon man
 
In constitutional law no less...

What is trumps in, cocaine connoisseurship...

eh no... his degrees were: Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) degree from Columbia University in New York and his Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree, magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School. B.A., Political Science, Columbia University, 1983 J.D. magna cum laude, Harvard Law School, 1991.
He was never a constitutional lawyer, closest the got to that was teaching courses part-time at the University of Chicago. One course was about race in the Constitution and that is where is erroneously referred to himself as a Constitutional lawyer. Once he decided that his direction was in politics he had his license inactivated.
 
Are you saying it can't happen?

Ok, impeach Trump.......so Pence is President, he has to nominate a VP that has to be confirmed, if he's impeached before that happens, the Speaker of the House takes over....

And you are trying to lecture others on the constitution?
No, just reality.
 
Of course I did, you just lack either the integrity or the knowledge to admit it. Perhaps both. Pelosi can not become President as a result of impeachments.

Just to refresh, bolded the part where you are dead wrong.
 
Of course I did, you just lack either the integrity or the knowledge to admit it. Perhaps both. Pelosi can not become President as a result of impeachments.

You did not.

You simply offered the following quote...

prometeus Quote: "You need a lesson in basic civics."

I offered you an opportunity to prove your ^ statement.

CharisRose Quote: "Please provide your knowledge of basic civics to correct me. TIA"

So far you have not backed up your statement with any kind of proof.

Perhaps, I missed your post where you provided your knowledge about basic civics.

If, you can't provide that post then.... I would say that you lack integrity (the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness) as you question my integrity.

Roseann:)
 
Yea, keep pointing out the situation you and others don't like.

A situation requiring a Constitutional process that requires a high threshold of all of the states to agree to... altering the Constitution in favor of what some but not all citizens want.

I live in majority Democrat barely Republican California.

I am thankful for the smaller states being wise enough to save the U.S. from the dictates of the large states like California and New York and some of the other states that follow their lead.

You know the states that provided Hillary with the popular vote you and others keep mentioning as a good reason to alter the Constitution in favor of giving more power to those states to the detriment of the smaller states you and others would like to overpower to get your nominee in the White House.

You do understand that the smaller states people are included in the "We the People" of the United States of America.

The idea of the Electoral College was put in place to protect the people in the smaller states being overpowered by your popular vote desire which only benefits the larger states and the other states who follow their lead to the detriment of the people in the smaller states.

Roseann:)

I guess Trump is everything you hoped he'd be.

 
The reasons I do not like it have been explained. But its NOT about my likes and dislikes. Its about a system that produces a president that sometimes (s in twice in the last five elections) goes against the principle of a government of the people, by the people and for the people. It produces a president who is rendered as illegitimate in the eyes of many Americans. That is bad for a democratic republic like ours and seriously erodes at public faith and confidence in the very system of government we have.



And that high threshold effectively changing the system as the smaller states who vote Republican will not give up any advantage that is perceived they have today. Its just not going to happen.



Today you live in California. As you know, the days are long gone when the vast majority of Americas were Michiganders, or Texans, or New Yorkers, or Alabamanians, or Iowans or any other state which claimed their allegiance. Today a baby is born in Ohio, has its family move to Illinois for a few years, maybe then lives in Colorado for a time, goes to college in Texas, does advanced studies in Oregon, meets a spouse and they settle in New Mexico, change jobs a couple of times over the next thirty years and live in Florida and New York and Tennessee along the way. They retire and live in Arizona.

We no longer are as tied to states as we have been in the past. Today we are the USA and most people consider themselves Americans first.

We have to far that fact and accept that fact and our political institutions must reflect that changing reality.





NO. I do NOT want to give any power to any state. I want the power too be with the American people regardless if they live in a big state or a small state or a village, town or city. I want all of their votes to have the same weight behind them and have no American with their vote counting more than any other citizen. And they only way you can do that is to abolish the EC.



Yes - we the people. All the people regardless where they live at any given point in their life cycle.



Actually, that is not true. I would refer you to Founding Father Alexander Hamilton in his excellent Federalist Paper 68 who explains why we have the EC and how it was suppose to protect America. He said the greatest threat to America came from a foreign power trying to install a creature of its own control into our highest office. And he said the small elite EC members would protect against that.

In 2016, not only did the EC fail to do that, but there is not a single shred of evidence that they even attempted to try and do that in one single state. Not a one. here is a link to it
The Avalon Project : Federalist No 68

Hamiltons words to the nation

[/COLOR][/I][/B]

Not one state did this when they met after the 2016 election. Not a one.

That was the Founders promise as how the EC would protect us in return for NOT having a direct citizen vote - and it has failed.

Thank you.
 
Boy, that sure makes the President less of a liar. Glad you pointed it out.


She wouldn't

1. have fawned over Putin & KJU as if diplomacy were dependent on gooey friendships.

2 She woldn't have made reckless blurts in the public arena such as the "fire and fury" rant by the President.

3. She would have signed the Paris accord.

4. She wouldn't have repealed hundreds of important environmental laws.

5. The WH would be well staffed ( staff are departing in droves in Trump's whitehouse ).

6. She wouldn't have gutted the state department. The State department would have ambassadors in every important country, at the minimum.

7. She wouldn't have given the super rich the tax break of the century, resulting in careening deficits hitherto unseen in history.


I could go on, but why bother, you've swallowed the Trump kool aid, there is no hope for you.

It's so amazing to me that people vote more in favor of a corporation than themselves. SAD
 
Us libs gave them no such thing. He was impeached, he still hasn't lived that down, or the other times he couldn't keep it zipped. She was not found even close enough to guilty to bother indicting. No one in the history of American politics has been more deeply investigated than Hillary Clinton, yet it just doesn't occur to you righties that maybe she's just not guilty.

We don't follow conspiracy theory nuts either. I haven't eaten any children lately?? You?
 
Back
Top Bottom