• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NBC: Barr approved expanded scope of Durham probe — to include Clapper and Brennan

Cardinal said:
Since I know you think the answer to that is “nothing,” thanks for admitting that absolutely none of these investigations you’ve ever hung your hat on ever amounted to anything.
Click to expand...

Yet...
 
apdst said:
After the Reussian collusion flop, you can bet your ass they are. They've already been caught lying to Congress in the past. They think they're untouchable.
Click to expand...
I seriously doubt that.
 
apdst said:
I eagerly await your outrage at Democrats breaking the law. Oh, wait...I better not hold my breath. Huh?
Click to expand...

Show me the laws they are breaking.
You surely have the cites to said laws on your cut and paste board right?
 
apdst said:
You routinely ignore corruption by everyone and falsely accuse Trump of crimes that don't even exist.
Click to expand...
Horse ****. Cite any occasion (w/link) that I have improperly made an allegation against your “Dear Leader”.
 
Acadia said:
Thank you for confirming yours is a religious attack which betrays our Constitution.
Click to expand...

Are you kidding me?

I fully support your rights to be religious - I will march with you in arms to defend it.

I do NOT defend using the AG office to give seditious speeches that paint secular americans as enemies that are destroying the country.

FFS you guys are IMPOSSIBLE.
 
apdst said:
Abuse of power, violating The Constitution.
Click to expand...

Great, let's get them all out along with Trump for the same.
I am A-Okay with that. But not one or the other based on your preference for a specific party.
 
Cardinal said:
Remember the IG investigation that republicans were hungrily waiting on? Whatever happened to that?
Click to expand...

Barr is an illegitimate AG and a seditious traitor that is stoking civil war flames with his unamerican Rhetoric. Of course, religious americans claim I am assaulting religion when I say Barr's beliefs make him unfit to serve.

They are a disgrace.
 
danielpalos said:
Congress has oversight since they enact the laws and not the president.
Click to expand...

Again, that's true, but that doesn't give them the authority to interfere with an ongoing investigation. It violates seperation of powers.
 
US&THEM said:
How is that irrelevant? Without either it is a review.
Click to expand...

Investigations occur prior to the grand jury hearing. The investigation is the stage where evidence is gathered and analyzed.
 
apdst said:
Again, that's true, but that doesn't give them the authority to interfere with an ongoing investigation. It violates seperation of powers.
Click to expand...

It is not a investigation, it is a review. Until you can show some type of real information it will remain a review.
 
Obscurity said:
Barr is an illegitimate AG and a seditious traitor that is stoking civil war flames with his unamerican Rhetoric. Of course, religious americans claim I am assaulting religion when I say Barr's beliefs make him unfit to serve.

They are a disgrace.
Click to expand...

The Constitution prohibits religious tests, so you're definitely assaulting The Constitution.
 
apdst said:
Investigations occur prior to the grand jury hearing. The investigation is the stage where evidence is gathered and analyzed.
Click to expand...

Who is doing the investigation? Durham is a PROSECUTOR
 
US&THEM said:
Has Durham convened a grand jury? Has the FBI or any other law enforcement open a criminal investigation?
Click to expand...

I've been told FBI doesn't comment on investigations until they've concluded....unless you're talking Comey and Lynch....its referred to as "a matter" :roll:
 
US&THEM said:
It is not a investigation, it is a review. Until you can show some type of real information it will remain a review.
Click to expand...

Call it what you want, Congress doesn't have the authority to interfere.
 
apdst said:
Again, that's true, but that doesn't give them the authority to interfere with an ongoing investigation. It violates seperation of powers.
Click to expand...

it doesn't give Your guys authority to ignore a Congressional subpoena, regardless.

The Senate cannot deny or disparage such an egregious flouting of Congressional authority.
 
danielpalos said:
it doesn't give Your guys authority to ignore a Congressional subpoena, regardless.
Click to expand...

Congress doesn't have a legitimate legislative reason to subpoena Durham.

The Senate cannot deny or disparage such an egregious flouting of Congressional authority.
Click to expand...

What are you referring to?
 
Trump said:
I've been told FBI doesn't comment on investigations until they've concluded....unless you're talking Comey and Lynch....its referred to as "a matter" :roll:
Click to expand...

FBI would comment if they were involved.
 
US&THEM said:
It is not a investigation, it is a review. Until you can show some type of real information it will remain a review.
Click to expand...

Review would not include taking in new evidence like cell phones....and DOJ does not comment on open investigations....unless you're Comey.
 
apdst said:
Congress doesn't have a legitimate legislative reason to subpoena Durham.



What are you referring to?
Click to expand...

Where is it written that congress must have a legitimate legislative reason to issue subpoenas?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom