- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 19,883
- Reaction score
- 5,120
- Location
- 0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
I do love a good liberal spin...
Saddam NEVER STOPPED brutalizing his people.
You really want to go down that road? You do realize that justification calls for invading and occupying Russia, Iran, Burma, China and even Turkey to a degree no?
there were three reasons given to attack Iraq, global ties to terrorism
Which pale in comparison to US ties but let's ignore that for now.
refussal to comply with UN resolutions regarding the disposition of his known WMD programs
You mean like the fact he didn't have anything?
and genocide. Genocide has been a common theme. His republican guard made people disappear on a regular basis.
You appear to be unaware of what "genocide" means.
We are involved in regime change in Libya. Their country represents aboslutely no threat to the American people. We stepped in it and its up to our knees. Funny tho that even though we as the president says, dont stand for povernments killing their citizens, we havent said **** in Syria, Saudi, Bahrain, Yemen...the hit list goes on. And face it...it doesnt MATTER. He could launch an attack on a girl scout cookie stand and his true believers would find a reason to justify it.
What exactly are you arguing? You defend Iraq on the basis of its leader brutalizing people, but at the same time you aren't for invading others on the same rational?