• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nate Silver Says Bloomberg is Slipping in Polls After Debates: He’s in ‘A Lot of Trouble’

Surrealistik said:
Not at all.

The only reason Bloomberg is polling even close to where he is, despite only being in this race for 2-3 months is because he dumped hundreds of millions into his campaign, and carpet bombed the airwaves, full stop. Again, we're talking about a guy who started at zero, and ended up being in the top 2 or 3 candidates in terms of aggregate polling, surpassing people who have been in this race since the beginning.

Money does as a point of fact breed support.
Click to expand...

Bloomberg's money bred access. Not support.
 
Fletch said:
Hes not dropping because you libs are so virtuous. He is dropping because he had the worst debate performance in history.
Click to expand...

He had the worst debate performance in history because he has a lot of nasty **** in his history that he was called to answer for. And dems have apparently actually listened and considered the evidence. Unlike what Republicans did with Trump.
 
roughdraft274 said:
He had the worst debate performance in history because he has a lot of nasty **** in his history that he was called to answer for. And dems have apparently actually listened and considered the evidence. Unlike what Republicans did with Trump.
Click to expand...

Maybe, but the race isnt over yet. And Trump was a far better debater. Bloomberg should have had some prepared responses for accusations he had to know were coming. He should be out of the race, but the alternatives to him are so bad that he just might be the nominee yet.
 
Fletch said:
Maybe, but the race isnt over yet. And Trump was a far better debater. Bloomberg should have had some prepared responses for accusations he had to know were coming. He should be out of the race, but the alternatives to him are so bad that he just might be the nominee yet.
Click to expand...

Heh, this is amusing. Trump has never had an actual debate in his entire life.
 
Fletch said:
It defines Bloomberg. And you will gladly vote for a racist, sexist, arrogant billionaire authoritarian if he has a (D) next to his name so stop pretending like you have any moral standards.
Click to expand...

Why not? That's what you GOP voters did in 2015/2016. Nobody really cares about your opinion of a "moral standard".
 
Puigb said:
Heh, this is amusing. Trump has never had an actual debate in his entire life.
Click to expand...

You clearly werent paying attention in 2016, so your opinion is worthless.
 
Puigb said:
Why not? That's what you GOP voters did in 2015/2016. Nobody really cares about your opinion of a "moral standard".
Click to expand...

So in other words, if confronted with the same choice, you would choose the racist, sexist arrogant Billionaire authoritarian because he has a (D) next to his name, demonstrating that you are no better than the people you denounce and hate. Thank you for proving my point.
 
Fletch said:
So in other words, if confronted with the same choice, you would choose the racist, sexist arrogant Billionaire authoritarian because he has a (D) next to his name, demonstrating that you are no better than the people you denounce and hate. Thank you for proving my point.
Click to expand...

Considering that Bloomberg has no chance of winning the nomination, unlike Trump, who despite no political experience or history of supporting conservative policies, managed to steamroll over 15 other experienced life long Republican candidates, your comparison is moot. You people did in fact vote for worthless trash to be your nominee and president, because he was an R and he pissed off the "EVIL libs". That hasn't been the case with Bloomberg, who is faltering badly. In fact, "Mini Mike" should have waited and run as a Republican in 2024, as he could have easily done a lot better with the idiot Republican voters than he's doing now.
 
Fletch said:
That your opinion is worthless? Sure, I agree with you on that.
Click to expand...

Not an opinion though. Trump hasn't actually debated anything in his entire life. But facts have a "liberal bias", eh?
 
eman623 said:
Bloomberg's money bred access. Not support.
Click to expand...

If you honestly believe that Bloomberg's money had no serious part to play in his performance thus far, I honestly don't know what to tell you save that you seem to be posting from an alternate reality.

Marketing and electoral campaigning are multi billion dollar industries for good reason: because they persuade people and move needles. Again, money isn't everything, but it sure is a lot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom