• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Muslims are 84% of Child Sexual Predators in UK Sex Grooming Cases

I don't think anyone would argue that 'we have no rapists of our own'. My frustration, is the fact that we seemed hell bent on making matters worse for vulnerable girls, by forcing even more predators upon them.

Forcing?
 
Yes, we had no rapists of our own.

Didn't say that. Didn't imply that. Didn't say or imply ANYTHING about home-grown rapists.

Almost every reply from you is a variation of that non sequitur. You need to expand your repertoire of excuses and apologies. You have long since grown predictable and tedious.
 
You mean Muslim societies? You know, the societies from where we import rapists?

We import rapists? I am of Sicilian background. You should see what they said about us in the USA back in the day. And Catholics? Fuggedaboutit.
 
We import rapists? I am of Sicilian background. You should see what they said about us in the USA back in the day. And Catholics? Fuggedaboutit.

There was a time when boarding houses in the UK had a sign on the door. No Dogs Or Irish.
 
There was a time when boarding houses in the UK had a sign on the door. No Dogs Or Irish.

Here in the Southwest US the sign said “No dogs or Mexicans.” In one of his movies, the great Mexican comedian Cantinflas played a shop or restaurant owner. He displayed a sign that said “Se admiten perros y hasta un gringo.” Trans: we’ll admit dogs and even a gringo.
 
We import rapists? I am of Sicilian background. You should see what they said about us in the USA back in the day. And Catholics? Fuggedaboutit.

I'm talking about the topic of the thread.
 
Here in the Southwest US the sign said “No dogs or Mexicans.” In one of his movies, the great Mexican comedian Cantinflas played a shop or restaurant owner. He displayed a sign that said “Se admiten perros y hasta un gringo.” Trans: we’ll admit dogs and even a gringo.
Reminds me of the guest who asked the waiter whether the restaurant served pig.

Upon which the waiter replied "sit down Sir, we serve anybody".
 

Absolutely. Just look at how the disgraced British police agencies took the side of the rapists in many cities, and shut the door to impoverished girls complaining of sex abuse. This entire matter was forced upon the poor girls.
 
For someone to have a username as truthatallcost you certainly don't live up to it. Put on your critical thinking cap and stop pressing blatant propaganda.
 
For someone to have a username as truthatallcost you certainly don't live up to it. Put on your critical thinking cap and stop pressing blatant propaganda.

Just be thankful he wasn't living in Germany in the 1930s.
 
So, has anyone actually provided proof that the OP is wrong? Has there been a successful debunking of the original claim?
 
So, has anyone actually provided proof that the OP is wrong? Has there been a successful debunking of the original claim?

It's a claim. The onus is with the claimant.
Yes there have been some well publicised cases involving men from the Muslim community, but there are no stats AFAIK denoting the ethnicity of the abuser in all cases.
 
You mean Muslim societies? You know, the societies from where we import rapists?

Imported. Mostly these people are born there. At least this is true for the terrorists. Same in France. Only in Germany were most of the perpetrators just brought in recently. As far as I know, anyway.
 
Imported. Mostly these people are born there. At least this is true for the terrorists. Same in France. Only in Germany were most of the perpetrators just brought in recently.

Whether first or second generation, the West has invited in a culture that simply does not mix with ours.
 
It's a claim. The onus is with the claimant.
Yes there have been some well publicised cases involving men from the Muslim community, but there are no stats AFAIK denoting the ethnicity of the abuser in all cases.

The reason of lake of statistics is because the government don't care to collect information about crimes, or is it because it avoids be specific on its statistics for the "prejudice avoidance"?

Because if its the second case, UK has two problems than.
 
Death penalty doesn't deter crime. Back when there was no prison sentences they'd hang thieves in public and pickpockets would work the crowd. The states with capital punishment don't have lower capital crime rates- in some cases they have higher.
A gibbet was just a gallows, for hanging. Nothing to do with a guillotine.

Singapore has very low gun and drug crimes, and the death penalty for both.
 
The biggest problem with refugees is that most of them come to Europe believing they will have a luxuries, earn money without work or have easier jobs than in their hometown, or at least leave poverty behind. But when they arrive they realize that Europe is far from what they see in the TV and movies. People here have to work hard, most jobs are under payed, you have to pay a lot of taxes, cost of living is expensive, most communities are isolated, boring and with few people around. So a lot of them, if not most of them, don't actually like Europe and are not actually running from wars but chasing a better economic opportunity and life style. This is why a lot of them, if not most of them, leave their parents, wives and children in their homeland, and may refugees leave Europe back to their homeland, while many others stay in Europe but become violent, criminals and hateful demanding that the government to give them free money, better house, "better food", a "better city to live", burning refugee camps because they don't get free Nutella, harassing women because they came with expectation to find "promiscuous European women" and they would have a more active sexual live. ETC.

Just be thankful he wasn't living in Germany in the 1930s.

That's true. Although they weren't 100% wrong about the Jewish.
Germany in the 30s and today is committing the very same mistake, being crazy deterministic and with unrealistic dealing with the reality.
Germany back then was stupid wrong trying slave and kill people they considered "unfit" to their society. Germany today is stupid wrong avoiding the facts and consequently the real solution of their problem.

If Germany and other rich countries were worried about people in poor countries, they would stop **** in such countries. But they can't do that because there is an elite's wealth interest to fulfill.



Look what women say about their husbands running to Europe and leaving them behind.



The main problem I believe to be people attached to ideologies. Ideologies makes people mask the reality to avoid look at it, believing in an unrealistic fairytails. When we talk about some subjects to them they don't want listen to anything that fade their fairytail, what they do is just wait to hear something that they believe they can argue back with their ideological pre-set arguments they keep saying without even think about. And it happens both to conservatives and liberals.
 
Singapore has very low gun and drug crimes, and the death penalty for both.
Portugal has very low gun and drug crimes and no death penalty at all.
Has Switzerland death penalty, because their guns and drugs crimes is low as well.

Singapore has the size of London but with 2/3 of London's Population. So it is easy for people to carry guns and drugs around. Nobody has to travel more than 30min to have access to guns and drugs.

Singapore is what it is today because of a 31 years of Lee Kuan Yew’ dictatorship, and many people was condemned to death without trial in order to kill all kind of opposition. So we can say that Singapore has high criminality but a monopolistic criminality held by the government.

Tell me now, how is the death penalty working in America and Middle East countries?
 
Whether first or second generation, the West has invited in a culture that simply does not mix with ours.

I've known plenty of Muslims who have mixed in perfectly fine, thank you very much.
 
So, has anyone actually provided proof that the OP is wrong? Has there been a successful debunking of the original claim?

Which claim? The OP says 84% of child sex predator cases are Muslim, but the link he provides is from a far-right anti-Muslim website and it doesn't even make that claim.
 
It also has a Muslim population. How can that be?

Islam isn’t the first or second largest largest religious community in Singapore, Buddhists and Christians outnumber them
 
Back
Top Bottom