• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mueller "Witch Hunt"

calamity said:
...seems to be uncovering a lot of witches.



Yes it sure is.
Click to expand...

The Trump Administration is a schmucktangle of liars grifters narcissists sex predators and morons

And replace the word schmuck with another word that rhymes with it for Optimum impact
 
Grim17 said:
The investigation was predicated on Russian collusion... So how many people has Mueller found to have colluded with Russia thus far? What credible evidence has come to light indicating that Trump or members of his campaign colluded with Russia?

I wouldn't call the investigation a witch hunt at this point, but I will say this... If this thing in the end comes up with nothing credible showing that Russian collusion took place, then based on that and all of the corruption within the FBI and DOJ that's been uncovered, I think labeling the investigation a witch hunt would be very appropriate.

We'll just have to wait and see.

.
Click to expand...

WTFC?

We want to know whether our president is a criminal and Associates with criminals

The latter part of the above statement has already been answered which means that the first part is more likely.

Who cares if it's Russian collusion or not crime is crime
 
calamity said:
Those would be the ones who were after Hillary....for four years, $200 million dollars, 10 congressional hearings and ZERO indictments or convictions.
Click to expand...

Do you really think it is far to bring up such facts to critics of the Mueller investigation?
 
calamity said:
...seems to be uncovering a lot of witches.



Yes it sure is.
Click to expand...

Do you mean the Russians didn't steal our election? But Lester Holt said they did, and Scott Pelley too.
 
calamity said:
Those would be the ones who were after Hillary....for four years, $200 million dollars, 10 congressional hearings and ZERO indictments or convictions.
Click to expand...

Well she had the president, the AG, the DOJ, and the FBI in her back pocket. Of course she was not indicted for anything. Lol

You need to emerge from your alternative universe and stop repeating liberal talking points. Think for yourself man!
 
BuzzwordBingo said:
Well she had the president, the AG, the DOJ, and the FBI in her back pocket. Of course she was not indicted for anything. Lol

You need to emerge from your alternative universe and stop repeating liberal talking points. Think for yourself man!
Click to expand...

C8HWXTrUQAQ3vhQ.jpg
 
haymarket said:
Do you really think it is far to bring up such facts to critics of the Mueller investigation?
Click to expand...

I often feel like I am lecturing to a five year old when bringing facts to a Trumper.
 
calamity said:
I often feel like I am lecturing to a five year old when bringing facts to a Trumper.
Click to expand...

Do you think that comparison is fair to most five-year olds?
 
Thoreau72 said:
Do you mean the Russians didn't steal our election? But Lester Holt said they did, and Scott Pelley too.
Click to expand...

I'm usually pretty good at interpreting Pidgin, Ebonics, and various other short-speech. But, I have no idea what the **** you are trying to say in that post.
 
calamity said:
Those would be the ones who were after Hillary....for four years, $200 million dollars, 10 congressional hearings and ZERO indictments or convictions.
Click to expand...

:lamo



To a lot of people it looks like the FBI and other investigators went easy on the old Hilldog. Comey even said she broke the law but no "reasonable prosecutor" would prosecute her:lamo That's why once this witch hunt is wrapped up, Trump needs to sic Mueller on Hilldog.
 
calamity said:
Those would be the ones who were after Hillary....for four years, $200 million dollars, 10 congressional hearings and ZERO indictments or convictions.
Click to expand...

It helps with a FBI that covers for you!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
CitizenBasehead said:
:lamo



To a lot of people it looks like the FBI and other investigators went easy on the old Hilldog. Comey even said she broke the law but no "reasonable prosecutor" would prosecute her:lamo That's why once this witch hunt is wrapped up, Trump needs to sic Mueller on Hilldog.
Click to expand...


That’s some funny shiz right there, I don’t care who you are. Lol
 
Amelia said:
Poor Trump.

He had no idea all those fine people with whom he surrounded himself were such criminals.
Click to expand...

Psssh. They committed those crimes just so they could later plead guilty and take down Trump.
 
Grim17 said:
Clinton hiring a former foreign spy to compile Russian anti-Trump intel. Period, end of conversation.

.
Click to expand...

This is Trump's DOJ. Do you really not understand how stupid and blatantly dishonest it is to suggest that Trump's DOJ could convene a grand jury to seek indictment on Hillary, but is not doing that despite obvious guilt because conspiracy derpity derp?
 
calamity said:
Those would be the ones who were after Hillary....for four years, $200 million dollars, 10 congressional hearings and ZERO indictments or convictions.
Click to expand...

Teflon Hillary probably still lives in fear since congressional investigators are still looking into her past much the same way Mueller is looking into Trump's past.
 
marke said:
Teflon Hillary probably still lives in fear since congressional investigators are still looking into her past much the same way Mueller is looking into Trump's past.
Click to expand...

Mueller 6, Congress 0
 
Grim17 said:
Clinton hiring a former foreign spy to compile Russian anti-Trump intel. Period, end of conversation.

.
Click to expand...

Perfectly legal, above board and---here's the clincher---no one on Hillary's side committed perjury in their Congressional testimony or broke US conspiracy laws like Trumps gang of lying thieves did in the process.
 
BuzzwordBingo said:
That’s some funny shiz right there, I don’t care who you are. Lol
Click to expand...

lol...your side has memes; we have 6 guilty pleas and verdicts, 30 indictments and one soon to be indicted first family.
 
There are issues with Mueller's investigation.

Questioning the Legitimacy of Mueller’s Investigation
Echoing Democrats, Republicans say Robert Mueller, a patriotic and honorable man, should be allowed to finish his work. Let’s take Trump the lightning-rod out of the equation. If we were to pretend that the president is a Democrat, what would be made of that claim?


  1. Rectitude
    Mueller’s personal rectitude would be irrelevant. If he or you don’t think so, go ask Ken Starr. In any event, a prosecutor’s personal integrity is never dispositive when he or she commences an investigation, seeks a warrant, or tries an accused. What matters is whether the laws and rules have been satisfied.
  2. Special Counsel Neither Necessary Nor Authorized for Investigation of Russia
    If the president were a Democrat, it would be pointed out that to question the special counsel’s criminal investigation of the president is not to question the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. The latter is vital. No one denies that it should be aggressively pursued to its conclusion.
    Moreover, if the counterintelligence investigation were incidentally to turn up concrete evidence that Donald Trump had committed a crime, no one denies that a special counsel appointment would be appropriate at that time. (Get it? Evidence of crime first, then assignment of prosecutor.) But unless and until that were to happen, a counterintelligence investigation does not need a prosecutor at all, much less a special counsel. That is why the aforementioned special-counsel regulations do not authorize an appointment for counterintelligence cases.
  3. Conflict of Interest
    It is a condition precedent to the appointment of a special counsel that there be a conflict of interest. There is no such conflict preventing the Justice Department from investigating Russian interference in the election. If that were not obvious enough, Mueller himself has elucidated the point by transferring the two indictments he has brought against Russian operatives to Justice Department components — the “Troll Farm” case to the U.S. attorney’s office in the District of Columbia, and the hacking case to Main Justice’s National Security Division. If there were a conflict of interest, it would be inappropriate for the special counsel to make such transfers. To the contrary, there is no reason why DOJ could not have investigated these cases in the normal course — if there is a “normal course” for a pair of publicity-stunt cases that will never be prosecuted.

But while we’re on the subject of conflicts . . . let’s have a brief look at Mueller’s staff.
. . . .
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/trump-russia-probe-robert-mueller-investigation/
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom