- Joined
- Dec 5, 2009
- Messages
- 27,808
- Reaction score
- 22,648
- Location
- Indiana
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Nope...only when they rule inaccordance with the law, whether I like it, or not.
Your past posts show otherwise.
Nope...only when they rule inaccordance with the law, whether I like it, or not.
Your past posts show otherwise.
The continual defense of your mistake and responsibility is getting real old. You have ignored my posts that include FOX NEWS video's and trusted links in order to defend your ignorance. You're in complete denial of what is going on. And it's because you have insisted on living in a right wing media bubble for the last two decades. It's clear you have only listened to right wing talk show hosts & only read right wing sites, that regurgitate information, then spoon feed it back to you in 3 or more daily hours of right wing hyperbole, half truths, lies, and enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling, aka the News YOU want to hear. You have been brainwashed to believe than any other news sites are FAKE..
Your right wing talk show hosts wanted a revolution against the "Establishment" and they sold you Trump. Now they're running like a bunch of rats leaving a sinking ship.
Donald Trump breaks the conservative media - Business Insider
The GOP That Failed - POLITICO Magazine
You were warned a thousand time over about Donald Trump, you OWN it now. So when this comes crashing down on your head, and it's going to you remember where to point the finger.
![]()
Here is Rush Limbaugh when a caller was able to sneak onto his program and corner him.
https://www.mediaite.com/online/cal...that-rush-knows-he-blew-it-with-donald-trump/
Of course I would to a point I don’t agree with much of the republican platform so why wouldn’t I be against some of the things Cruz would have wanted. Duh. I said to the extent of we wouldn’t be talking about Russian collusion or twitter tantrums if trump wasnt there. We also would t be taken his thanks to trumps unprofessionalism. Many Trump supporters are flat out idiots. The fact I would want Cruz or even pence as president before trump proves your comments are bull****.
Of course you would be 100% into the resistance if Cruz had been elected president. That's my point. Doesn't have a damn thing to do with Trump. He's just your lightening rod. If Cruz was president, Cruz would be your lightening rod.
Well maybe we have not but federal judges have and they are signing warrants and convening grand juries...
Since being employed by the WH it looks like Kushner was using a private email for work related business.
And can we be assured you and the left will not object even when his attorney's decide which ones were work related and to be turned over and the destroy the rest? I was saying more than a year ago what will the left say when Trump and his administration decide to follow her lead and do as she did with her emails, they will have no leg to stand on to complain.
I originally was a cruiser but I think trump was the better man for the job this cycle. I think the best man won.Of course you would be 100% into the resistance if Cruz had been elected president. That's my point. Doesn't have a damn thing to do with Trump. He's just your lightening rod. If Cruz was president, Cruz would be your lightening rod.
Well we need to determine his intent before we can know if we should be upset or notSince being employed by the WH it looks like Kushner was using a private email for work related business. I shall await the outrage from those that rode Clinton on her email F up.......crickets!! Mueller and the FBI will be on this a duck on water. The excuses and lies from Kushner are already in motion.
See you at the hearings !!:mrgreen:
Kushner used private email for White House work: report
Link?
Oh for God's sake I'm not going through all your partisan one sided posts to prove a point. I don't have time for that. It's obvious to anyone that had has read your posts.
So in other words, you are unable to explain what Trump has received fron Putin. I mean, we are about 20% of the way home. There must be something...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...b4e4bb76a3a_story.html?utm_term=.1d43f4b3d3fbWhile Donald Trump was running for president in late 2015 and early 2016, his company was pursuing a plan to develop a massive Trump Tower in Moscow, according to several people familiar with the proposal and new records reviewed by Trump Organization lawyers. As part of the discussions, a Russian-born real estate developer urged Trump to come to Moscow to tout the proposal and suggested that he could get President Vladimir Putin to say “great things” about Trump, according to several people who have been briefed on his correspondence.
Sure I do:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...b4e4bb76a3a_story.html?utm_term=.1d43f4b3d3fb
When Trump claimed 4 bankruptcy's in this country, leaving banks holding the bag on millions of dollars--bankers in this country were very reluctant to loan him money--which is why he expanded the Trump Empire into several different foreign countries. To build a Trump tower in Moscow would require very high level approval, probably from Putin himself, so he cozied up with Russian billionaires to make it happen.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...llionaire-putin-trump-clinton-ties/472061001/
You'll find that everyone that is under direct investigation right now--Flynn, Manafort, Kushner--all had financial interests in Russia.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/paul-manafort-retroactively-registers-justice-department-foreign-agent/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...9bba1a-9d48-11e7-8ea1-ed975285475e_story.html
Michael Flynn, Russia and a Grand Scheme to Build Nuclear Power Plants in Saudi Arabia and the Arab World
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...4d09ff5a4a8_story.html?utm_term=.9ea746c5e2cd
There's a Russian interest in every corner of this adminstration. In the future you'll hear more names brought into this. Carter Page, J.D. Gordon, Roger Stone, and probably others we haven't heard about yet.
![]()
What federal judge has said there is a probable cause here and what probable cause has been presented to justify the SC? That is one of the issues Judge Mukasey was pointing out this morning, nothing that we know of presents a probable cause for a crime and that the SC is to be limited to such probable cause but has not shown one to justify his investigation of expansion of it.
Oh yes... The famous Carter Page��... The influential JD Gordan��.
What has Putin received? No sanction relief, bombings of his ally, revved up oil production, just what is it... 20% of his way through. There must be something.
The sanctions plan blew up when Republicans/Democrats in both houses realised what Trump & Putin's plans were. You must have some serious reading comprehension issues.
![]()
As I have already publically stated, I could care less what happens to the minnows, its the big fish that may fry.![]()
Well we need to determine his intent before we can know if we should be upset or not
Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
What do you mean what federal judge, do you think no knock search warrants.sign themselves? What in the world makes you think that a special prosecutor is in a.y way required to give you or anyone else updates?
I really don't give a crap about judge judy or whatever fake tv judge you trot out thinks.
This is an ongoing investigation of course the Investigators are not going to comment.
The sanctions were imposed by president Obama AFTER the election.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-passes-sanctions-on-russia-iran-and-north-korea/The Senate has passed a sweeping sanctions package targeting Russia, Iran and North Korea with an overwhelming bipartisan majority, 97-2.
The U.S. House passed the sanctions package Tuesday in a 419-3 vote, sending the legislation to the Senate. The White House has not definitively said that President Trump will sign the bill, but the the measure won a veto-proof majority in both the House and Senate.
The measure -- a reprimand for Russian interference in the 2016 election cycle, among other things -- requires congressional approval before the president can ease or lift sanctions. The White House had criticized attempts to limit the president's sanctions powers, but the legislation's solid bipartisan support may be forcing the president's hand. White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said on Monday night aboard Air Force One said the president is "looking over" where the legislation stood.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russiaGCHQ-first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.
Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.
The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.
So is that a yes, you do not would not object?
What are you on about, that was yesterday, I have moved on.