• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mueller hands down 13 Russian indictments!

Acadia said:
Mostly, they had the Left susses for the weak, easily manipulated sheep which millions of them are.
Click to expand...

Acadia said:
Oh, millions on the Left have a very fragile sense of self and they need someone to tell them what to think and do.
Like putty in the hands of Russians.
Click to expand...

Acadia said:
I think the word you're looking for is 'lemmings'.;)
Click to expand...

I try not to use provocative words but you got the point.
 
Acadia said:
I, otoh, think there's too much at stake to be subtle:lol:
Click to expand...

Sometimes it's better to get a person to think rather than react.
Sometimes that ain't possible.
 
There's no evidence in the current indictments involving Trump in the Russian meddling.
So, why did Trump really fire Comey?
Why did Trump call the investigation a "witch hunt?"
Why did Trump not want the investigation to continue?
Maybe he did and maybe he didn't "collude" with the Russians. Maybe he did, and maybe he didn't know about it, and know that they wanted to defeat Hillary Clinton.

If he was really unaware of the purpose of the Russian meddling, why didn't he want the issue investigated? Why would he be afraid of the truth?
 
Dittohead not! said:
There's no evidence in the current indictments involving Trump in the Russian meddling.
So, why did Trump really fire Comey?
Why did Trump call the investigation a "witch hunt?"
Why did Trump not want the investigation to continue?
Maybe he did and maybe he didn't "collude" with the Russians. Maybe he did, and maybe he didn't know about it, and know that they wanted to defeat Hillary Clinton.

If he was really unaware of the purpose of the Russian meddling, why didn't he want the issue investigated? Why would he be afraid of the truth?
Click to expand...

He could.
It is.
Zero evidence of that, in fact, the administration has been copiously supportive and welcoming.
Zero evidence again.
Afraid? Surely, you jest.
 
Acadia said:
He could.
It is.
Zero evidence of that, in fact, the administration has been copiously supportive and welcoming.
Zero evidence again.
Afraid? Surely, you jest.
Click to expand...


The administration has been copiously supportive and welcoming of the witch hunt. Sure.
 
Dittohead not! said:
The administration has been copiously supportive and welcoming of the witch hunt. Sure.
Click to expand...

Yup, that's what you do when you've got nothing to hide.
Bring it on.
 
Acadia said:
Yup, that's what you do when you've got nothing to hide.
Bring it on.
Click to expand...

Yep. Bring it on, but....


“Russia talk is FAKE NEWS put out by the Dems, and played up by the media, in order to mask the big election defeat and the illegal leaks!” Trump tweeted last Feb. 26.
Click to expand...

source
 
HowardBThiname said:
It is impressive, but did you miss the part where it states people in the Trump campaign and elsewhere in the US, were "unwitting participants?"

That's a pretty clear early indicator that they can't nail down any actual, intentional collusion.
Click to expand...

It depends on how you want to look at it. Keep in mind that I am skeptical about the idea that the sitting President of the United States did collude with a foreign adversary in undermining the nation’s election.

The presentation Rosenstein had toward this was that the collusion narrative does not exist *in this indictment*.

So for people genuinely convinced that Trump and/or his campaign did collude with the Russian government in undermining the election, there’s not much there to show you that that’s the case. For people convinced that Trump and/or his campaign did not collude with the Russian government in undermining the election, there’s not much to disprove it yet.

Just like with the previous indictments and guilty pleas, we just have to wait and see how this develops over the coming months.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 
HowardBThiname said:
Yes, we should thank Mueller, but have you read the indictments?

Because, they include some things you might find interesting, such as the Russians were also doing some pulling for Bernie Sanders as well as organizing rally protests against Trump.

What do you make of that?
Click to expand...

Putin didn't care as long as it wasn't Hillary.........other than that?? Not sure - I thought he was also for Jill Stein??
 
Greenbeard said:
Russia_US_93563-de084-4487.jpg
Click to expand...

I'm stlll waiting for real evidence of collusion.
 
Glen Contrarian said:
Nah...there's no collusion! Why would one think that when Trump still refuses to allow the sanctions on Russia passed by Congress with a combined vote of 528-7? Why would one think that when Trump publicly and repeatedly took Putin's word over that of the CIA/FBI/NSA?

So you can believe Trump when he has said several times that he believes Putin when Putin said Russia was not interfering with America's elections...OR you can believe the FBI who has just indicted 13 Russians for doing precisely that (almost certainly at the behest of the Kremlin).

What's your choice? Whom do you choose to believe? Trump? Or the FBI? Or maybe you can make the third choice, that the FBI is right, but that Trump really does believe Putin, but what, then, does that say about how incredibly stupid (or blackmailed) Trump is?
Click to expand...

I'm still waiting for real evidence of collusion.
 
Ever ask yourself why Putin was afraid of Hillary Clinton? Seems he, like a lot of American voters, had an "anyone but Hillary" attitude. Why?
 
DamnYankee said:
Months and months and millions of dollars later, 13 foreigners indicted? Nice. :roll:
Click to expand...

Bet you didn't have a problem with the investigation into Hillary Clinton SEVEN times and still came up with nothing.
 
LowDown said:
I'm still waiting for real evidence of collusion.
Click to expand...

I know this may come as a shock to you, but "collusion" is not the only possibility. The one that is far more likely to be used is "obstruction of justice"...and there's more than enough proof of that to impeach Trump, even if we look only at what he did to shut down the investigation against his National Security Adviser (and paid Turkish agent) Michael Flynn. The only reason that he hasn't been impeached for that is because the Republicans control both houses of Congress. What's happening, then, is that Mueller is building such a wide-ranging case that it will be impossible for the GOP to ignore it and try to wish it away...and IMO the worst charges will be made public in September - too early to be called an "October surprise", but late enough to have a significant effect on the midterm elections...and too late for Trump to try to grant blanket pardons to everyone (including himself) to try to get away from the long arm of the law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom