Most Corrupt POTUS ever: Barack Hussein Obama & his Surveillance State

[swing_voter]

Obama's Obamacare has gotten 90% of the country health insurance.



.

 

[Mycroft]

gfy..

???

What does that mean?

 

[Lfl]

???

What does that mean?

It means you have Biden Derangement Syndrome.

 

[Mycroft]

It means you have Biden Derangement Syndrome.

No. BIDEN has Biden Derangement Syndrome.

 

[Simon W. Moon]

When will we reach the put-up-or-shut-up point?

When do we reach the put-up-or-shut-up point?

How long till all these investigations and investigators from Trump_DoJ
start doing something like bringing charges for all these heinous crimes?
Doesn't the seriousness of the crimes and the interminable delay cause you to question their priorities?
Obviously the evidence for the crimes is right out here on the internet for all to see.
What's taking Trump_DoJ so long to bring charges?

No idea, I was never a member of the Trump DOJ. I retired during Obama's second term.

We would allike the answer to that
Again
.lots of creepy stuff going on

When did all of these crimes happen?
How long did it take y'all to see the evidence of these crimes?
It's literally been years now, right?

There's all this evidence out there for everyone w/ internet access to see.
So much evidence that boogaloo fools are out there killing cops to help Trump.

But, for some reason, the people who actually bring charges etc have not filed charges based on the mounds of obvious evidence available to everyone w/ internet.
We're reasonably sure these people, the potential charge filers, have internet.
So, the reason(s) why there have been no charges brought against these superlative crimes must be something else other than the evidence is unavailable to them.

You guys seem to have no clue about why there are not charges yet.
I don't know why there haven't been charges either.

From what I heard it's a super simple open and shut case.
Apparently, even us idiots on the internet can see how obvious the many heinous (but mostly unnamed) crimes are.
But not the folks who bring charges.
One possibility is that the folks who bring charges are incompetent people who're dumber than the average internet user who has seen the mountains of evidence.


Another possibility I have heard is that the evidence the people on the internet are riled up about
is insufficient and/or flawed.
Wacky BS most likely, right?


Obviously,
if 1000 years pass and no one has been charged with these horrible nameless crimes,
it's likely that no one is ever going to be charged with them.

If 100 years pass and no one has been charged with these horrible nameless crimes,
it's likely that no one is ever going to be charged with them.

If 10 years pass and no one has been charged with these horrible nameless crimes,
it's likely that no one is ever going to be charged with them.

What if 5 years passes and no one has been charged with these horrible nameless crimes?
Is it likely anyone will ever be charged with these horrible and nameless crimes if 5 years goes by w/o charges despite multiple investigation?

What about 4 years?

What about 3?

When do we reach the put-up-or-shut-up point?
When will reasonable proponents abandon the idea that many heinous nameless crimes were committed for Obamagate?





.

 

[Moderate Right]

When the Motherload of Obama and his administration’s crimes hit the fan... that fan will need Texas size blades and be nuclear powered.

The left always accuse the right of turning a blind eye to Trump & Co. I wonder if they will be guilty of turning a blind eye to all of this. I predict the left and the left media will support Biden no matter what dirt is uncovered. Hopefully this stuff will sink in to those in the middle.

 

[zimmer]

ROTFLOL...

Editor’s corrections is red:

Obama's Obamacare has increased the cost of the country’s health insurance dramatically while failing spectacularly to solve the problem they claimed they would.



.

 

[zimmer]

It means you have Biden Derangement Syndrome.

No such thing.

There is Biden amusement syndrome.

Laff-a-lot at Goo Brain gaffe-a-lot syndrome.

Wait for the Biden foot-in-mouth Racist comment syndrome.

And the syndrome for betting when Ground Hog Biden will come out of his hole in the ground and grace us with his Ghost White presence.

 

[zimmer]

Obama's Obamacare has gotten 90% of the country health insurance.



.

Obviously it doesn’t cover mental health issues, as they’re letting Goo Brain Biden run around thinking he’s a viable candidate for President.

 

[zimmer]

Lest We Forget the Horrors: A Catalog of Trump’s Worst Cruelties, Collusions, Corruptions, and Crimes: The Complete Listing (So Far): Atrocities 1-796 - McSweeney’s Internet Tendency

Comrade Barack Hussein Obama and his administration... MOST CORRUPT PRESIDENT IN US HISTORY.

 

[zimmer]

Oh look, your thread title and signature say the same things. Marching orders have been disseminated.

You still haven’t formed a rebuttal... because you know it’s true...

...BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, THE MOST CORRUPT PRESIDENT IN US HISTORY.



PS. Well compensated by the RNC.

 

[Casper]

When the Motherload of Obama and his administration’s crimes hit the fan... that fan will need Texas size blades and be nuclear powered.
QUOTE]
Benghazi!!! :lamo :lamo :lamo

 

[Yes_Minister]

No...not me. In fact, I am more likely than most to cite left-wing news sources to support my comments.

Oh BS. I seen you dismiss articles I posted due to ''left-wing'' bias.

I'm not interested in your attempts to use whataboutism as a deflection from the facts about the corrupt Obama administration...which just so happens to be the topic of this thread. Your claims about Trump and Bush do NOT negate the facts about Obama.

True and I did post an article critical of Obama. Obama is not a leftist, he is not my champion. I think he is a disappointment. I bet Bernie would have tried to get rid of it.

I think what you are doing here is trying to use this score cheap partisan points, you don't seem to care about this surveillance state when a Republican is in charge of it, which makes wonder how much you really care about this issue. Its not ''whataboutism'' to point this out, its actually looking at patterns of these things start and continue, rather than looking at one part of it for solely partisan reasons and then covering your ears to the rest of it.

He and his administration DID illegally use the NSA database for corrupt purposes...a lot...since at least 2012. That's a fact. When Rogers shut down the ability to do that in Apr 2016, Obama and his corrupt administration started their illegal operations against the Trump campaign, continued during the transition period and, after the inauguration, installed the Mueller team to control the DOJ/FBI as long as they could...all with the help of the mainstream media...to hold off investigation and legal action against those corrupt Obama pukes as long as they could. Those are facts.

Well, that's over. The investigations of Durham and others is happening. Those Obama and deep state pukes (some of them, at least) will be held accountable. That's a fact.

All the whataboutism in the world from you and others won't change those facts.

But now that the Surveillance State is at the command of Trump, I bet you think its a good thing. Do you oppose the Surveillance State in general or only oppose it when its not controlled by conservative elites like Trump and Bush?

Because Trump will never abuse it right?

https://theintercept.com/2019/08/04/whistleblowers-surveillance-fbi-trump/

Surveillance States Are Flexing Their Muscle | The New Republic

 

[Mycroft]

Oh BS. I seen you dismiss articles I posted due to ''left-wing'' bias.





True and I did post an article critical of Obama. Obama is not a leftist, he is not my champion. I think he is a disappointment. I bet Bernie would have tried to get rid of it.

I think what you are doing here is trying to use this score cheap partisan points, you don't seem to care about this surveillance state when a Republican is in charge of it, which makes wonder how much you really care about this issue. Its not ''whataboutism'' to point this out, its actually looking at patterns of these things start and continue, rather than looking at one part of it for solely partisan reasons and then covering your ears to the rest of it.



But now that the Surveillance State is at the command of Trump, I bet you think its a good thing. Do you oppose the Surveillance State in general or only oppose it when its not controlled by conservative elites like Trump and Bush?

Because Trump will never abuse it right?

https://theintercept.com/2019/08/04/whistleblowers-surveillance-fbi-trump/

Surveillance States Are Flexing Their Muscle | The New Republic

Doubling down on whataboutism is still whataboutism. Dismissed. (see my sig)

This has nothing to do with "cheap partisan points". It has everything to do with a corrupt administration and the rule of law.

 

[Yes_Minister]

Doubling down on whataboutism is still whataboutism. Dismissed. (see my sig)

This has nothing to do with "cheap partisan points". It has everything to do with a corrupt administration and the rule of law.

And Trump is never corrupt right?

Can the Constitution Reach Trump’s Corruption? | The New Yorker

Seems like you are hiding behind ''whataboutism'' to justify hypocrisy and rank partisanship.

I already dismissed you dude, when you posted from some right-wing hack site. I find your dismissals hilarious, dismissals from someone who suffers from the ''Dunning Kruger'' effect as much as you do, are a joke.

 

[smallvoice]

Racists try to cover up Trumps incompetence, theft, and TRE45ON by blaming the best President of the last at least 50 years who brought us out of the great recession that Repug Bush Jr put us in.

Nonsense, and you know it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[2distracted]

Oh BS. I seen you dismiss articles I posted due to ''left-wing'' bias.





True and I did post an article critical of Obama. Obama is not a leftist, he is not my champion. I think he is a disappointment. I bet Bernie would have tried to get rid of it.

I think what you are doing here is trying to use this score cheap partisan points, you don't seem to care about this surveillance state when a Republican is in charge of it, which makes wonder how much you really care about this issue. Its not ''whataboutism'' to point this out, its actually looking at patterns of these things start and continue, rather than looking at one part of it for solely partisan reasons and then covering your ears to the rest of it.



But now that the Surveillance State is at the command of Trump, I bet you think its a good thing. Do you oppose the Surveillance State in general or only oppose it when its not controlled by conservative elites like Trump and Bush?

Because Trump will never abuse it right?

https://theintercept.com/2019/08/04/whistleblowers-surveillance-fbi-trump/

Surveillance States Are Flexing Their Muscle | The New Republic

I mysf don't want anyone surveilling Americans.

That said th RS are way more trustworthy

 

[2distracted]

And Trump is never corrupt right?

Can the Constitution Reach Trump’s Corruption? | The New Yorker

Seems like you are hiding behind ''whataboutism'' to justify hypocrisy and rank partisanship.

I already dismissed you dude, when you posted from some right-wing hack site. I find your dismissals hilarious, dismissals from someone who suffers from the ''Dunning Kruger'' effect as much as you do, are a joke.

So u demand that conservatives not have any double standard that favors conservative politicians but Mr Bill gets a pass.. Obummer ditto

Got it