• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Miss Michigan stripped of title for being a Conservative.

Ah, rather than addressing the racist remarks of Miss Michigan, you rather pile on to all the bad stuff blacks do; i.e. defend racism. :roll:

BTW: we do not have a welfare state. I pointed that out to you in the Reparations thread. We live in a fascist Far Right "state." Income disparity stats prove it. :doh

You scream "racism" constantly so I DENY your claims and I reject any argument of yours that claims someone else is racist. You have used that term so many times, dishonestly, that it no longer has any meaning.. We don't live in a fascist far right state. If that were true, you would have been "re-educated" long ago or worse. The fact that you can spend most of your waking hours spewing nonsense about Trump and his supporters, proves that you know what you say is a lie
 
It is not the purview of the pageant committee to ask her. She simply should not have written anything that can be construed as racist. She knew the guidelines and ignored them.

By the way, the OP was about her getting disqualified. It is not about Islam or what they are doing there. Stick to the subject.

So far, the trend has been to defend racist comments because "Blacks!" and now "Muslims!" Yes, pointing to the perceived misbehavior of a minority group is racism.
 
And I suspect economic darwinists, like you, will ignore how the tragedy of the commons itself disrupts and destroys your entire ideological lean.

The great society was a progression. I'm not entirely sure why you lot continuously fight against what is good for americans.


No it wasn't-it was designed to create a dependency class beholden to Democrat politicians
 
No it wasn't-it was designed to create a dependency class beholden to Democrat politicians

lol...can you support that trope with, you know, facts.
 
You scream "racism" constantly so I DENY your claims and I reject any argument of yours that claims someone else is racist. You have used that term so many times, dishonestly, that it no longer has any meaning.. We don't live in a fascist far right state. If that were true, you would have been "re-educated" long ago or worse. The fact that you can spend most of your waking hours spewing nonsense about Trump and his supporters, proves that you know what you say is a lie

Facts have a liberal bias. I know. :roll:
 
The word "apparent" meaning what, you take their characterizations as fact, without need of supporting evidence?

Listen. The organizers told her she'd been stripped of her title for her social media content. Presumably (is it okay to say 'presumably'?) she knows what they're referring to.
It might well be something you or I would consider minor, not meriting stripping the title, but until we've been told what it was there's no justification for calling it a smear.
Besides, it's a beauty pageant title. Who cares? Beauty pageants are clinging to life by threads, nobody gives a damn anymore. Hell maybe it is all a cooked-up farce designed to get some desperately-needed publicity. Trying to be somehow relevant. But beauty pageants are such antiquated relics nothing can make them matter.
 
lol...can you support that trope with, you know, facts.

It worked. we now have multiple generations on welfare. LBJ was smart-he achieved what he claimed he would achieve
 
Facts have a liberal bias. I know. :roll:

Another one of your many lies. Liberalism is a mental disorder? See we both can spew mindless one liners, that have little relationship to reality
 
I think that may play a part in it as you need real life scenarios for someone to be able to connect with the characters and create that empathy for them but I think it largely has to do with the combination of the writing and talent of the actor/actress that really creates that lasting quality. For instance, Sanford and Son without Redd Foxx would not be the hit with lasting appeal without him or even with someone else playing that character. There are just times that the combination of good writing and right talent come together to produce that iconic character like an Al Bundy, Thelma Harper, All 4 of the Golden Girls, Archie and Judith, George Jefferson, Steve Urkel and Carl Winslow etc. I can't think of any character from a sitcom released in the last decade that you could put up with that list and say they would have that same lasting appeal. It could very well be just nostalgia, but considering some of those shows ended before I was even born it would be hard to make that case.

Gunsmoke and Bonanza.
 
It worked. we now have multiple generations on welfare. LBJ was smart-he achieved what he claimed he would achieve
More garbage assertions without substantiation.
 
Kathy Zhu has said she will not be taking legal action against Miss World America. Now why is that?

Because she signed a "Good Character" agreement with the pageant organization and obviously didn't take this contract seriously.

Ergo, Zhu has no cause to litigate MWA stripping her title for contractual reasons. :violin
 
Kathy Zhu has said she will not be taking legal action against Miss World America. Now why is that?

Because she signed a "Good Character" agreement with the pageant organization and obviously didn't take this contract seriously.

Ergo, Zhu has no cause to litigate MWA stripping her title for contractual reasons. :violin

No worries for her, the racists are taking up her cause, as we see.
 
No it wasn't-it was designed to create a dependency class beholden to Democrat politicians

You're incorrect and you know it.

It was designed to care for people that capitalism left behind.

Like I said, tragedy of the commons defeats your entire argument.
 
Facts are racist to liberals. Always have been - especially inconvenient facts. The party of science, lol. Liberals don't acknowledge or even understand science. They only understand #science.
 
Facts are racist to liberals. Always have been - especially inconvenient facts. The party of science, lol. Liberals don't acknowledge or even understand science. They only understand #science.

The **** does this have to do with anything? Science says the climate is warming and man is one of the primary drivers. Yet you claim the left doesnt listen to science.

You mean the left doesnt listen to the corporate shills paid for by big oil that promote their paleoconservative oligarchy trash kn fox news?
**** off with your noise.
 
It is not the purview of the pageant committee to ask her. She simply should not have written anything that can be construed as racist. She knew the guidelines and ignored them.

By the way, the OP was about her getting disqualified. It is not about Islam or what they are doing there. Stick to the subject.

and just stating an opinion they way she did...in both cases is NOT racist imo

i believe the pageant is wrong

i am stating MY opinion

andi believe her remarks could have been easily clarified one way or the other...but again, today we dont want to talk to people, we WANT TO JUMP to conclusions

easier that way
 
It is not the purview of the pageant committee to ask her. She simply should not have written anything that can be construed as racist. She knew the guidelines and ignored them.

By the way, the OP was about her getting disqualified. It is not about Islam or what they are doing there. Stick to the subject.

It can be construed as racist to decline to wear a hijab?
 
and just stating an opinion they way she did...in both cases is NOT racist imo

i believe the pageant is wrong

i am stating MY opinion

andi believe her remarks could have been easily clarified one way or the other...but again, today we dont want to talk to people, we WANT TO JUMP to conclusions

easier that way

How many times do I have to say the same thing?

Let me put it in a simple way. You go to a party that says you will not drink out of the punch bowl until after 10:00 pm or you will be thrown out. You sign the guideline and then at 9:45 pm you drink from the punch bowl and you get thrown out.

It does not matter if you drank from the punch bowl because you were thirsty or drank from the punch bowl because you "thought" it was after 10:00 pm or if you drank from the punch bowl because you forgot, or drank from the punchbowl because you thought it was a stupid guideline or if the rest of the party goers agreed with you that it was a stupid guideline. The fact that you drank from the punchbowl before 10:00 pm and signed the guideline that you wouldn't means you will be thrown out of the party!

Understand now?
 
How many times do I have to say the same thing?

Let me put it in a simple way. You go to a party that says you will not drink out of the punch bowl until after 10:00 pm or you will be thrown out. You sign the guideline and then at 9:45 pm you drink from the punch bowl and you get thrown out.

It does not matter if you drank from the punch bowl because you were thirsty or drank from the punch bowl because you "thought" it was after 10:00 pm or if you drank from the punch bowl because you forgot, or drank from the punchbowl because you thought it was a stupid guideline or if the rest of the party goers agreed with you that it was a stupid guideline. The fact that you drank from the punchbowl before 10:00 pm and signed the guideline that you wouldn't means you will be thrown out of the party!

Understand now?

if you ask 1000 people on the street, in a midwestern city...say St Louis....if her statement was racist...would all 1000 people say it was? NFW

it is a ****ING OPINION from the organizers...it is not a black and white thing....many people would agree, many people wouldnt

that is WHAT makes it wrong....a hard and fast rule on something that isnt subjective....sure (she cheats on something...throw her ass out)

but one where there are opinions that differ mightily? that makes it a subjective ruling....

that is where my issues are....and they never sought to seek clarification
 
Trump-supporting Miss Michigan stripped of title over ‘racist’ tweets



So here we have another example of out of control intolerance by liberals who strip Miss Michigan of her title for nothing more than having a different viewpoint than themselves. I can't even fathom what will happen if these people get in power as the thought police will make sure you have no freedom of thought or expression if it doesn't strictly adhere to their worldview.


And yet these people claim we're fascists? Good grief.

Liberals are the most tolerant people in the world. Just ask any of them. They are tolerant of anything they are suppose to be tolerant to. Just don't ask them to actually be tolerant... They really aren't. It's one of the several big lies they tell themselves, so they can sleep better at night.
 
Trump-supporting Miss Michigan stripped of title over ‘racist’ tweets



So here we have another example of out of control intolerance by liberals who strip Miss Michigan of her title for nothing more than having a different viewpoint than themselves. I can't even fathom what will happen if these people get in power as the thought police will make sure you have no freedom of thought or expression if it doesn't strictly adhere to their worldview.


And yet these people claim we're fascists? Good grief.

No, she wasn't stripped of anything for being conservative.

What a pathetic lie.
 
:lol: SPLC. :mrgreen:


Howsabout I go find something from Alex Jones, so that our sources will be equally credible? :)

Congrats with your classic example of ad hominem! They're quoting DoJ but, hey, don't let that stop you from dismissing the data!

Truly a gold star effort. :applaud
 
Facts are racist to liberals. Always have been - especially inconvenient facts. The party of science, lol. Liberals don't acknowledge or even understand science. They only understand #science.

Lulz. How on earth would you ever even begin to know that?
 
I learned that you don't know what a propaganda hack organization the SPLC is. And yes, she said blacks kill most of the blacks who are murdered.

They were quoting the DoJ. Didn't you used to work for them? Here's the report, it was linked in that piece:

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rhovo1215.pdf

And whites kill most whites, Hispanics kill most Hispanics, etc. That's what DoJ found. Do you doubt those data?
 
Back
Top Bottom