- Joined
- Oct 14, 2015
- Messages
- 64,304
- Reaction score
- 62,754
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
I will rephrase. Give me the name of at least one guy who claims to have proven at least one point of the democrat dossier.
^
I'm always amazed that even in this day and age, there are still internet posters who think they're somehow scoring a point by either signalling that they will reject any evidence that contradicts their spew or in fact rejecting said evidence, and then demanding that another poster provide them with "evidence".
Seriously, marke, who do you think you're fooling here? Your words are right there on the page. You constantly shifted the goalposts, and Vern provided a nice summary of that reeking dishonesty. Trump could admit everything lie on TV, and you'd just say that Obama and Mueller tricked him into doing it, then ignore it.
It is not Trump who is exposing the crooked dossier for what it is. It is dozens of republican congressmen, conservative spokespeople and qualified unbiased investigators.
Like David Nunes?
:lamo
I'm trying to do you a favor. I'm trying to explain to you that your gambit is far too obvious and far too hamfisted in execution. The more time passes, the more the dossier's claims prove true, the more convictions Mueller racks up. Necessarily, your stupid conspiracy theory expands to include federal judges and juries. Necessarily, it looks even more obviously stupid and dishonest.
But do keep going. Do keep telegraphing that you will call anything indicative of its truth "not evidence", then demand "evidence", as if you'll somehow have won when the people you derp at eventually give up and go talk to someone else.