Therein lies the problem: you only want one side of the story.
What happened to your wife is ****ed up and if it had been my wife, I would've ****ed that dude up, but we can't take one true story and make it the gospel for every incident.
The unintended concequences of MeToo are already taking effect.
First of all I was mainly responding to an ignorant view of what women are afraid of, which is NOT being looked at in the wrong way, but abuse, assault, rape.
And of course there are going to be downsides. I acknowledged them. There are downsides to just about every decision/major change. Tax cuts have a huge downside, but pointing them out doesn't mean we shouldn't do them, just that we have to consider them, and weigh them against the benefits.
No difference here. Is it better that women are feeling more empowered to report incidences of physical abuse at home and at work, or that men are slightly more hesitant to mentor women? That's a fair question, and one that is probably best answered by women in the workforce rather than us mansplaining what's best for them. What's not fair IMO is pointing out that men are more reluctant to mentor women, and without carefully weighing the upside declaring that #metoo has gone too far.
Next, we're going to hear women complain that they're being held back, either because they can't advance, or can't get hired, in the first place.
As far as women like Uma Thurmon and Ashley Judd go, I have zero sympathy. They could have easily said no, but they didn't. They gave up that ass in exchange for fame and fortune.
The pendulum is indeed swinging too far and it's working women that are going to feel the effect.
I don't know enough about Thurmon and Judd's cases to judge them and won't. I will point out that in general I don't blame women for being sexually assaulted and making the wrong decision coming out of that. The person at fault is the abuser. Period. The woman is a victim. Period. What decision she makes to deal with that doesn't affect either outcome.
I'm not going to look up the details, but one woman assaulted by Weinstein did report the assault, the cops came, took a statement, she was obviously assaulted. What happened? His influence bought silence, nothing happened, the cops and prosecutors did NOTHING. So this woman ruined her career, likely, and the outcome to her was all negative.
The point is when there is a power differential, and there nearly always is, a very real and likely outcome in many cases is this:
Woman reports assault, she's called a whore, slut, liar, bitch, crazy, her reputation shattered, job loss, black balled, and nothing happens to the abuser. Well, hell, I can't fault women for not signing up for THAT. Are they moral giants? No, in some ways they are cowards, but they are VICTIMS who often have no good choices. THAT is the real core of the problem.