So, a woman who gets drunk, sexually assaults a subordinate isn't a slut? Sounds pretty slutty to me
Why am I not surprised to see people defending sexual assault, because the accused is a female (a democrat female)?
Hey, Ap. What's your reading level, homie? I feel like, given how badly you always twist my words and avoid discussing what I
actually say, I'm thinking I may need to dumb it down a bit for you. Unless, of course, you think by twisting what people say you come off as provocative, in which case, let me help you out here, you come off looking like a lackwit.
Her behavior, if true, would not be considered "slutty"... Good grief, the only people that call others that these days are either immature guys trying to figure out their chances of scoring outside of their snack bracket, cuckolds, prudes, or just bitter that someone is getting more action than they are. Which one are you, Ap?
If she acted this way she is a criminal...nothing more, nothing less. She should be investigated, and held accountable if her behavior was deemed to be outside of what is acceptable under the law, just like every man accused of the same. Wouldn't it be nice if that was the end of the story? You know, just like every other damn crime? lol... But no, because it's an uppity woman involved with standing up for other women, who stands accused, you use it to smugly discount an entire movement, for who knows what bent and twisted reason you've decided to be against movements trying to help women avoid being harassed and assaulted. We should all strive to be a good and noble human being like you, Ap.
Anyway, whatever, your thread is garbage, your logic is dead on the floor, and it's just another day at DP. I know you won't respond in any thoughtful, meaningful way, so happy trolling. It's Friday.
