:lamo
You folk are just so dang cute with your lies and hypocrisy.....
And yet you people ALWAYS prove that the above is simple Projection from feeble minded folk who cower EVERY challenge to document the alleged "lies" and "hypocrisy". So....I think we both understand who is who, and what is what, between you and I....now don't we? Yes, of course we do. You just proved it...yet again...by no having the stones to back up your empty-headed remarks with credible examples of the above.
And whats pathetic is you obviously KNOW it but just plod on anyway.
:lamo
More PROJECTION. Of course, I've laid out my FACTS, which are also THE FACTS of this matter. And you, like KLATTU, don't have the intellectual chops to rebut them....but you DO have plenty of ego. So you feel compelled to respond in ways that attempt to change the subject without addressing the IRREFUTABLE FACTS of the matter.
Sorry, you (like KLATTU).....LOSE. lol.
And come on now...how goofy do you intend to paint yourself? The sheer fact that rats defended Clinton in spite of the accusations is proof. The sheer fact that after being exposed as a racist, the rats just swept everything under the rug is proof. The fact that 2 women with verifiable facts made legitimate allegations of rape against the rat Lt Gov of Va and that also got swept aside while people like you **** your britches over an allegation from 3 decades ago with NO facts, where the accuser doesnt know the day, cant recall the month and isnt even sure of the year, has changed her story countless times, changed the number of people in attendance, the participants, and when she finally settled on 6 people NONE of them can verify such a gathering either existed...yet not only bobbed and swallowed but spent MONTHS roiling in your hatred and STILL maintain a belief in her bull****.
Wow...that was some kind of emotional rant, there. Did you turn pink in the face while typing it? Geez...:lamo
Now, let's deconstruct that rhetorical flurry of run-on sentences to see if you addressed ANY of my challenges, shall we?
Challenge 1. You accused me of lying. I challenged you to list my "lies". Yet, as I JUST predicted, you've completely dodged that issue. That tells me that you, in fact, are the liar here. And, what's worse, now there is little doubt that you KNOW you were lying, but you don't have the "fortitude" (to be kind about it) necessary to retract and/or apologize for lying about me. That's helpful information for dealing with you in the future. Not at all surprising, but helpful nonetheless. You are, to me, exactly what you've shown yourself to be, from this day forward.
Challenge 2a.
Next, you accused me of "hypocrisy". Let's examine that bit of standard 'pube Projection, shall we? Well, the FACT of the mater is that, throughout the entire Bill Clinton witch hunt investigation, lead by you 'pubes in congress, I NEVER defended Bill Clinton against the credible allegations of sexual misconduct. Not then. Not now. Not once. Not ever. In fact, you'll find very few examples of anyone (other than Hillary, Carville, etc.) who defended Clinton against sexual assault allegations. What they did "defend" Clinton against were assertions that impeachment was the appropriate recourse for lying about a consensual sexual affair in the WH. But apparently, to most pubes, the line between rape and consensual sex is a bit blurry.
Challenge 2b. Next, let's examine the Northam and Fairfax issues. Your claim is that Democrats "swept under the rug" both Northam's past behavior, and the credible allegations of sexual assualt against Fairfax. Let's be clear: YOU LIED. The FACT is that Democrats almost unanimously called for BOTH to resign from office. They refused, but to imply that Democrats supported or ignored those incidents is to be one of two things: a LIAR, or a FOOL. You cannot impose your wingnut alternate reality on this board. Sorry. Facts are facts. Lies are lies. And liars do what liars do, as you've demonstrated in this exchange. Period.
Challenge #3: You were challenged to explain how ANY of the above nonsense (i.e. the deflecting arguments about Clinton, Northam, Fairfax, etc) have ANYTHING to do with your ongoing endorsement of the sexual misconduct of people like Kavanaugh (and Trump). This is ANOTHER challenge you've avoided. Clearly, I was correct when I suggested that you only "defense" of your character is to argue that it's no worse than mine. Of course, that's as dishonest as it is revealing and pathetic. Men of high character do not RATIONALIZE immoral behavior as a means of defending their own. You and I are just not equals here, morally or ethically. You are clearly of a lesser moral fiber. .
