"Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

[AGENT J]

I think you are confused, and there’s nothing to do for it except to keep up the fight people who continually get in the way.

nothing to fight about and there are no people that continue get in the way. Educated honest objective and non-bigoted people understand the facts i pointed out and they are already established :shrug:

disagree factually prove otherwise

countdown to the excuse and deflection train . . . 3 . . . 2. . . .

 

[RamFel]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

this will be good, what does ability to procreate "prove"?

This WILL be good. Procreate means having the ability to give birth. If you don’t understand then I really can’t help you, and boy, do you need help. You won’t be right until you understand. And I have my doubts that.

 

[AGENT J]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

This WILL be good. Procreate means having the ability to give birth. If you don’t understand then I really can’t help you, and boy, do you need help. You won’t be right until you understand. And I have my doubts that.

LMAO just like i said , this will be so good:lamo


Please tell us who when did i ask you what procreate means? Quote me asking you that, thanks!!!!

ill ask you MY question again:
what does ability to procreate "prove"?


thanks again!


who bets both my questions are dodged?

 

[maquiscat]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

This WILL be good. Procreate means having the ability to give birth. If you don’t understand then I really can’t help you, and boy, do you need help. You won’t be right until you understand. And I have my doubts that.

Strawman. That was not the question asked. He didn't ask what procreation was, but what does the ability to procreate prove?

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk

 

[maquiscat]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

LMAO just like i said , this will be so good:lamo


Please tell us who when did i ask you what procreate means? Quote me asking you that, thanks!!!!

ill ask you MY question again:
what does ability to procreate "prove"?


thanks again!


who bets both my questions are dodged?

Sorry, those odds are enough to make my money back.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk

 

[Divine_Wind]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

Strawman. That was not the question asked. He didn't ask what procreation was, but what does the ability to procreate prove?

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk

Sorry, those odds are enough to make my money back.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk

For a self-avowed libertarian you seem to have a major problem with what others believe. Do you think procreation is a requirement for marriage? Yes or no, please. No games.

 

[AGENT J]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

For a self-avowed libertarian you seem to have a major problem with what others believe. Do you think procreation is a requirement for marriage? Yes or no, please. No games.

and it seems like you are either making stuff up or simply misunderstood what you read because what you said makes no sense at all

 

[maquiscat]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

For a self-avowed libertarian you seem to have a major problem with what others believe. Do you think procreation is a requirement for marriage? Yes or no, please. No games.

No.

That being said, any religious beliefs I might have hold no standing upon my political beliefs. Ramfel is perfectly free to believe what he wants. But when questioned about it and he give answers that treat opinion as fact, or fail logically, he will be called out on it, just as I expect to be, and have been in the past, should I do the same. I am even willing to acknowledge a logical conclusion from what I feel is a faulty premise, such as I did in a thread about voting and taxes.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk

 

[Divine_Wind]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

No.

That being said, any religious beliefs I might have hold no standing upon my political beliefs. Ramfel is perfectly free to believe what he wants. But when questioned about it and he give answers that treat opinion as fact, or fail logically, he will be called out on it, just as I expect to be, and have been in the past, should I do the same. I am even willing to acknowledge a logical conclusion from what I feel is a faulty premise, such as I did in a thread about voting and taxes.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk

Perhaps you should consider being more positive in your approach, being more forthright about what you believe instead of just knocking down what others believe.

Just an idea.

Best of luck.

 

[Divine_Wind]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

and it seems like you are either making stuff up or simply misunderstood what you read because what you said makes no sense at all

Sure, I could be completely as you say. Wouldn't it be logical for you to completely ignore me from now on? After all, if I am as you think, then why should you bother replying to my posts?

 

[AGENT J]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

Sure, I could be completely as you say. Wouldn't it be logical for you to completely ignore me from now on? After all, if I am as you think, then why should you bother replying to my posts?

Translation: you cant defend your illogical assumption or post with integrity and admit maybe you made a mistake, got it LMAO
Let us know whan you can, thanks!

 

[Divine_Wind]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

Translation: you cant defend your illogical assumption or post with integrity and admit maybe you made a mistake, got it LMAO
Let us know whan you can, thanks!

Yes, I am flawed. I do my best, but do **** up on a regular basis. I try not to do so, but it happens. That said, I fail to see what point you are trying to make about my mistakes. Also, I'm curious who you mean by "us". Are you in a club? Some group?

 

[AGENT J]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

1.)Yes, I am flawed. I do my best, but do **** up on a regular basis. I try not to do so, but it happens.
2.) That said, I fail to see what point you are trying to make about my mistakes.
3.) Also, I'm curious who you mean by "us". Are you in a club? Some group?

1.) great thats a partial step . . . so did you **** up here by assuming with maquiscat's post? yes or no?
2.) your inability to see my point doesnt really matter but the point was your claim was wrong and made no sense, so you were making it up or making a mistake . . pick one
3.)well this is just basic common sense. is it just me and you here reading or are there many people reading? LMAO . . . .

 

[maquiscat]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

Perhaps you should consider being more positive in your approach, being more forthright about what you believe instead of just knocking down what others believe.

Just an idea.

Best of luck.

We still haven't found out what he believes or why. He keeps making contradictory statements and then makes dodges when we try to figure out what he is talking about.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk

 

[cpwill]

This study has a different number of concordance. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8494487

The correlation is 65% for identical twins vs 30 for fraternal twins.

Literally the first sentence:

"Twin pairs in which at least one twin is homosexual were solicited through announcements in the gay press and personal referrals"

:lol:


"African Americans were solicited on the Facebook Page "African Americans For Trump", and polled regarding their political preferences. We determine that the current approval ratings for the President among African Americans is 95%".

 

[Divine_Wind]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

1.) great thats a partial step . . . so did you **** up here by assuming with maquiscat's post? yes or no?
2.) your inability to see my point doesnt really matter but the point was your claim was wrong and made no sense, so you were making it up or making a mistake . . pick one
3.)well this is just basic common sense. is it just me and you here reading or are there many people reading? LMAO . . . .

1) When did asking questions become assumptions?....are kids so thin-skinned these days they can't leave their safe spaces?

2) Good. Again, a question is not a claim.

3) Glad you could recognize common sense. Kudos! That's a big first step for you. However, refusing to answer the "us" question is a step backwards. Sad.

 

[TheGoverness]

Sorry J, no deal. I grow tired of you trying harder and harder, as if you were right.

why should two guys have sex together?

Because they love each other? I have sex with my girlfriend because I love her. And that's not exactly uncommon to anyone else out there that has sex with their significant other, including straight couples. Your silly perspective is just that: silly.

 

[TheGoverness]

The reason question number three is wrong is because gay sex has no purpose other than self enjoyment between a pair of same sex gays.

So you have a problem with us having sex solely for the purposes of enjoyment, but it's fine when straight couples do the exact same thing?

At least be consistent with your silliness.

 

[RAMOSS]

Literally the first sentence:

"Twin pairs in which at least one twin is homosexual were solicited through announcements in the gay press and personal referrals"

:lol:


"African Americans were solicited on the Facebook Page "African Americans For Trump", and polled regarding their political preferences. We determine that the current approval ratings for the President among African Americans is 95%".

Welll yes.. the corrolation they were looking for is 'If one of the two of the twins were gay, there were xxx chances that their twin would be gay also'. They looked for one of the pair to be gay, and checked to see if the other one was gay too. So, you analogy for 'African Americans for trump' is not valid and incorrect.

 

[SDET]

So you have a problem with us having sex solely for the purposes of enjoyment, but it's fine when straight couples do the exact same thing?

At least be consistent with your silliness.

Going back to the OP, if the person in charge of a homosexual meetup site believes marriage is between a man and a woman, but is jim dandy with homosexuals meeting outside of marriage, he shouldn't be hassled. Some people promote causes purely for financial gain.

 

[AGENT J]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

1) When did asking questions become assumptions?
2.) ....are kids so thin-skinned these days they can't leave their safe spaces?
3.) Good. Again, a question is not a claim.
4.) Glad you could recognize common sense. Kudos! That's a big first step for you.
5.) However, refusing to answer the "us" question is a step backwards. Sad.

1.) when did you think posting lies would work? you made an assumption you didnt just ask questions

For a self-avowed libertarian you seem to have a major problem with what others believe.

2.) Irony . . .thin skinned like not being able to admit the mistake you made :shrug:
3.) see #1 the lie already failed.
4.) hey look a failed personal attack LMAO this is very common when somebody is having their posts exposed. LMAO
5.) didnt refuse anything add this lie and failed deflection to the list

Here we are in the same place with your assumption being wrong or a mistake . . pick one, we are waiting

 

[Divine_Wind]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

1.) when did you think posting lies would work? you made an assumption you didnt just ask questions

For a self-avowed libertarian you seem to have a major problem with what others believe.

2.) Irony . . .thin skinned like not being able to admit the mistake you made :shrug:
3.) see #1 the lie already failed.
4.) hey look a failed personal attack LMAO this is very common when somebody is having their posts exposed. LMAO
5.) didnt refuse anything add this lie and failed deflection to the list

Here we are in the same place with your assumption being wrong or a mistake . . pick one, we are waiting

1) Yes, too thin-skinned.
2) What mistake did I make? You're obviously very upset with me for my comment. Here's a solution: put me on ignore.
3) lying about others by claiming they lied is immature and dishonest. Please stop it.
4) You're doing your best, but failing.
5) You're free to assume anything you like no matter how ****ed up it may be. Have a good day!

 

[AGENT J]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

1) Yes, too thin-skinned.
2) What mistake did I make? You're obviously very upset with me for my comment. Here's a solution: put me on ignore.
3) lying about others by claiming they lied is immature and dishonest. Please stop it.
4) You're doing your best, but failing.
5) You're free to assume anything you like no matter how ****ed up it may be. Have a good day!

1.) thank you for bolding the part that makes it an assumption
2.) upset? . .hey look another failed assumption and deflection. Did all the laughing give it away? [/sarcasm]
3.) good thing i didnt do that lol
4.) facts and thread history prove otherwise
5.) thanks i am you are helping it be a good day.

Here we are in the same place with your assumption being wrong or a mistake . . pick one, we are waiting, thanks!

 

[Divine_Wind]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

1.) thank you for bolding the part that makes it an assumption ...

You're quite welcome. Now I'll let you get back to being a secret agent and I'll do some work outside. Good luck!

 

[AGENT J]

Re: "Marriage is for a man and a woman," HE believes

You're quite welcome. Now I'll let you get back to being a secret agent and I'll do some work outside. Good luck!

As you can see, my statements were proved right so no luck is needed, but thanks anyway!