Looking at someone for more than 5 seconds is creepy.

[Renae]

I agree that sounds stupid. What does that say about anyone automatically assuming it's true just because a single politically biased publication reported an anonymous source giving second hand information? I don't see the justification in instantly condemning and mocking the organisation without actually seeing the rules or at least seeking out more and better confirming sources.

Or maybe I just posted this because the concept was absurd and felt it would generate discussion. I was perhaps passingly curious to see if anyone felt these were reasonable measures the "should" be taken and to engage in a discussion on those lines. I'm sorry I chose a resource you found less than able to convey trusted information and that you lacked the time to seek out corroborating or countering information. Instead choosing to write a bloviated paragraph of your disdain for the OP.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/should-applaud-netflixs-new-flirting-crackdown/
https://www.cinemablend.com/televis...crews-from-flirting-and-staring-at-each-other - even advises that Netflix has not confirmed or denied reports.
-scratch that last one

 

[HonestJoe]

Or maybe I just posted this because the concept was absurd and felt it would generate discussion.

In which case you've no reason to feel attacked by to my response.

I'm sorry I chose a resource you found less than able to convey trusted information and that you lacked the time to seek out corroborating or countering information.

I wasn't objecting to your choice. The primary source was The Sun, the lowest kind of tabloid scum. Every other article just references (or copy-pastes!) that, generally treating it as if it's unquestionable true. It's a classic example of the mess of the media and shouldn't be given any kind of attention or credit.

 

[Renae]

In which case you've no reason to feel attacked by to my response.

I wasn't objecting to your choice. The primary source was The Sun, the lowest kind of tabloid scum. Every other article just references (or copy-pastes!) that, generally treating it as if it's unquestionable true. It's a classic example of the mess of the media and shouldn't be given any kind of attention or credit.

True, That's why I used NR At the time no one else had picked up on it. Others have tho.