Its not based on nothing. Her communications indicate she was active participant working against Trump.
I dont have an intimate knowledge of her role in it to give you specifics. Hopefully these two investigations are gonna reveal exactly what each person was doing in all this.
No, if you can't name the acts, her texts indicate nothing of the sort. And what's weird to me is you have no idea what,
if anything, she did wrong, but you're more than willing to throw out baseless allegations of her being involved, and defend Trump, President of the United States, publicly trashing her for two years based on
NOTHING. You can't come up with any act she did, but you repeatedly asserted her guilt in those acts you cannot identify.
It's frustrating, because it illustrates the danger of the President of the United States trashing you at campaign rallies, using you as a punch line, trashing you on Twitter to 60 million followers. You asserted she is corrupt and with corrupt acts tried to take down Trump, and SHE HAS NEVER EVEN BEEN ACCUSED OF A CRIME OR OTHER WRONGDOING.
For all you know she's innocent, and yet to you and 10s of millions of others, her reputation has been ruined, all because so far we know she was critical of Trump. That's it. That's her "crime," and she intended those criticisms to be PRIVATE. It's not enough to become the personal punching bag of the President.
And once again, by accepting it we make that behavior the new standard. If it works politically to pick out a citizen who by all accounts hasn't even been accused of a crime or serious wrongdoing, and trashing them for fun and profit for YEARS, every President now has a green light to do it endlessly, to anyone,
based on nothing.
It's disgusting IMO.
