• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lev Parnas, 'on the hook criminally,' to be interviewed by Rachel Maddow tonight

AlphaOmega said:
Fine by me, then we get to see both bidens, and schiff under oath.
Click to expand...

Are they being impeached? Why is the DOJ waiting? If they have evidence, haul them in and interview them...
 
AlphaOmega said:
Fine by me, then we get to see both bidens, and schiff under oath.
Click to expand...

Cool!

I saw a retired American ambassador to Russia on the News last night. He said Russia was going to be using propaganda to help Trump with his impeachment. It was going to come primarily as three things:

1. Whataboutism: Specifically, "Whatabout the Bidens, they should be testifying!" Why? This has nothing to do with them

2. Denials are not facts.

3. ?


But...way to go, you are helping Putin spread Russian propaganda. I believe the Russians have a term for people who unwittingly help them....Useful Somethings. Or are you doing it purposefully to help?
 
BlueTex said:
Are they being impeached? Why is the DOJ waiting? If they have evidence, haul them in and interview them...
Click to expand...

Yep, the exact message we were told to expect from Russian propaganda.
 
Hatuey said:
Your post is the lamest excuse for gas lighting. I guess you and Lev Parnas live identical lives by the sounds of it! Rubbing elbows with the highest of the elites are you guys?




Я Баба Яга [emoji328]
Click to expand...

Actually it could happen. For example, one was seated at the table, and one was called out from the kitchen to clean up some spilled food.
 
Last edited:
AlphaOmega said:
They will be witnesses. Especially schiff head.
Click to expand...

i'm sure he is terrified... LMAO... On the bright side, you are going to get to see plenty of Schiff in the next few weeks...
 
BlueTex said:
i'm sure he is terrified... LMAO... On the bright side, you are going to get to see plenty of Schiff in the next few weeks...
Click to expand...

Oh gosh. I hope so, he is so entertaining with his bug eyes and crazy bat **** leftist made up lies.
 
AlphaOmega said:
Oh gosh. I hope so, he is so entertaining with his bug eyes and crazy bat **** leftist made up lies.
Click to expand...

Can't wait to see him examining Giuliani on the stand under oath and watching Giuliani squirm as he presents loads of text messages, letter, emails, etc. to refute Giuliani's testimony under oath... These guys were stupid enough to leave a trail that even the most inept investigator could follow...
 
JustHanging said:
marke, why is it that time after time after time these liars are people that Trump has hired or appointed?

Why do you think Trump keeps hiring and appointing liars who turn against him, is he that bad a judge of character?
Click to expand...

You must be unaware of the fact that all men are liars, just as God said. Neither democrat nor republican can hire anyone who is not a liar.
 
marke said:
You must be unaware of the fact that all men are liars, just as God said. Neither democrat nor republican can hire anyone who is not a liar.
Click to expand...

That is your excuse ?:lamo
 
It's important to note if Pelosi had not delayed transmission of the Articles to the Senate. This news would not have come out in time. It is now significantly more likely that Republicans will be forced into a position where they will have to call witnesses during the trial.
 
BlueTex said:
Can't wait to see him examining Giuliani on the stand under oath and watching Giuliani squirm as he presents loads of text messages, letter, emails, etc. to refute Giuliani's testimony under oath... These guys were stupid enough to leave a trail that even the most inept investigator could follow...
Click to expand...

kinda like when you wereball excited about the russia collusion results! lol
 
dobieg said:
More speculation, innuendo and made up bs. He had no idea what the President thought or knew. Never spoke with him on Ukraine nor had any idea what his intentions were


This will get the hornets nest worked up but it will mean next to nothing in the senate hearings.
Click to expand...

Parnas said he overheard Trump's voice on the various phone calls. So this isn't just speculation or innuendo as it concerns Trump's intentions or actions. If he testifies to things he actually overheard Trump say, under oath, that would be direct evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom