Your failure to actually address my argument is noted.
Your argument was addressed.
It is wrong.
Telling you that you haven't established any such thing. Is addressing your argument.
And the following fully and succinctly addressed it.
"All there is are actions, and interpretations of those actions. Those interpretations are all subjective."
But since you don't seem to understand that lets address each statement to further show how wrong your statements are.
You're starting with the premise that morality is a matter of subjective opinion. This is circular reasoning.
No it isn't.
Morality is a matter of subjective opinion.
And the immorality of the Holocaust can be proved:
Only within a subjective framework.
Such as what you believe is good/bad/evil. Belief make it subjective.
1. A thing is good insofar as it is in accordance with its nature (thus a good car is one which works properly, or a good pencil is one which writes well).
What is good is subjective.
2. Free human acts are matters of morality.
No they are not. That is a condition that you have placed on them. Others don't.
3. Therefore an act which is against human nature is morally wrong.
You can not have an act that is against human nature.
4. It is against man's social nature to intentionally kill others without sufficient cause (since if it were, there would be a contradiction, as if such were right, then by doing this right thing a man would deprive others of their ability to do it to him, which would violate the fundamental equality of humans).
No it is not against man's nature, social or otherwise..
Man's nature is to kill that which he chooses for whatever sufficient reason he chooses.
An insult still is enough to kill for in places around the globe.
5. The holocaust was intentional killings committed without sufficient cause.
Wrong. They were intentional killings for cause. Which would be, being worthless Jews.
Others, in their subjective views, believed that to be wrong, and in there framework (which is subjective) it was objectively wrong. But onlyy within the subjective framework.
Outside of it, it is nothing more than an action.
Thus it is proved that the holocaust was immoral.
:lamo:doh:lamo
Thus nothing. You haven't proved any such thing.
And what you think you proved doesn't hold for the other side of the coin.