Leftist Journalists Harass Little Girl

[Airyaman]

So with that subjective reasoning, every single instance of satire can be rightfully removed from nearly the entirety of the internet. If someone simply "believes" that the instance was hateful?

That sound like a reasonable response to such things?

Not what has happened here, but keep on pretending.

 

[Oborosen]

Not what has happened here, but keep on pretending.

YouTube censors 14-year-old creator Soph after BuzzFeed hit piece

Apparently someone pointing out naughty things is all it takes at this point. Her getting removed isn't that much of a forgone conclusion as well, given how things have turned out for others on the site.

 

[3leftsdoo]

Projection is key to the left's understanding of the world. They hate people they disagree with, so they assume the people they disagree with must be full of hate themselves.

The truth is that, in today's world at least, people on the right are almost always more civil and less spiteful than people on the left.

I see a lot of projection in general. This internet character spews hate, whoever they really are.

 

[3leftsdoo]

YouTube censors 14-year-old creator Soph after BuzzFeed hit piece

Apparently someone pointing out naughty things is all it takes at this point. Her getting removed isn't that much of a forgone conclusion as well, given how things have turned out for others on the site.

I would find this more troubling if whoever is behind the account weren't using a 14 year old as an avatar.

But Google, like Facebook, must honor free speech, even when repulsive as in the case of this account's spewings.

 

[AmNat]

This internet character spews hate

When the modern left uses the word "hate", it means more or less the same thing as "reactionary" in Maoist China, a catch-all for political dissent.

 

[Oborosen]

I would find this more troubling if whoever is behind the account weren't using a 14 year old as an avatar.

But Google, like Facebook, must honor free speech, even when repulsive as in the case of this account's spewings.

The accounts spewing's being repulsive, depend on an ideological standpoint.
Despite the satire being used, such things are still perpetrated in some areas of the world, and to an even more horrible degree. Those places are actually found in some western parts of civilization.

Some of the earlier videos made the point of displaying this as well.

Then again, this sort of format isn't new for the likes of youtube. F-bombs for feminism has been a thing for some time now.

 

[AmNat]

F-bombs for feminism has been a thing for some time now.

It's really lol to see the same sort of people who support child drag queens and sex ed for elementary students, pretending to be shocked by a 14 year old cursing. It's the sort of concern trolling that you wouldn't think anyone could fall for at this point.

 

[3leftsdoo]

When the modern left uses the word "hate", it means more or less the same thing as "reactionary" in Maoist China, a catch-all for political dissent.

I can't speak for the "modern left" (whatever this undefined term means), but the individual/s behind this account spew/s hate.

Which is their right, as it is mine to decry it as such.

 

[3leftsdoo]

The accounts spewing's being repulsive, depend on an ideological standpoint.
Despite the satire being used, such things are still perpetrated in some areas of the world, and to an even more horrible degree. Those places are actually found in some western parts of civilization.

Some of the earlier videos made the point of displaying this as well.

Then again, this sort of format isn't new for the likes of youtube. F-bombs for feminism has been a thing for some time now.

Repulsive speech such as that of this account should be honored.

My only reticence might involve a reasonable age restriction - sixteen or older for instance - for platform access.

That this individual or individuals pretend to be fourteen - or actually are - is disturbing.

 

[Oborosen]

Repulsive speech such as that of this account should be honored.

My only reticence might involve a reasonable age restriction - sixteen or older for instance - for platform access.

That this individual or individuals pretend to be fourteen - or actually are - is disturbing.

The video is already age restricted, obviously not being intended for children on it's own. Though I have seen people trying to claim that it's being aimed at children, simply for the fact that a child is the speaker.

It's not like restricted mod on Youtube does much anyway. You can turn that filter on and find plenty of things that are volatile to the ear, or other senses. You used to be able to watch F-bombs for feminism a while back in restricted mode and if you look up The Young Turks. You can watch all of their own obscenity laced videos, if you so please.