- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 94,823
- Reaction score
- 28,343
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
If they could, they'd simply blame Jews for controlling the media. However, they're not satisfied with that. They have to paint the media as some secretive group of perverts who are controlling things behind the Bill Clintons and Harvey Weinsteins and Prince Andrews of the world. Even when they controlled the House, and impeached Clinton, they were the victims of a crime they never couldnt convict him or Hillary of. The media is both getting owned, and controlling the world around them. Jews. They mean Jews.The same people who deny systemic bias against African-Americans and other minorities, are the same individuals who insist the media has a systemic bias against conservatives. It never made any sense to me but, then again, white supremacy rarely does.
The same people who deny systemic bias against African-Americans and other minorities, are the same individuals who insist the media has a systemic bias against conservatives. It never made any sense to me but, then again, white supremacy rarely does.
Ideally, the media serve several essential roles in a democratic society. Their primary purpose is to inform the public, providing citizens with the information needed to make thoughtful decisions about leadership and policy. The media act as watchdogs checking government actions. They set the agenda for public discussion of issues, and provide a forum for political expression. They also facilitate community building by helping people to find common causes, identify civic groups, and work toward solutions to societal problems.
Media should be the watchdog of government, and try to inform..i.e. with facts, reality, not sow division,etc. I think right wing media does the opposite. I think left wing media is appropriately critical of the worst administration to ever be in the White House in modern history.
CLling media biased because it’s critical is an effort to discredit reasonably critical media, and to justify the direct collaboration of right wing media and right wing politics, most prominently today with DJT.
Links bombs from Jack. Thanks for nothing as usual. Doesn't debate, just link bomb and conspiracy theory.
It's a thoughtful critique from someone with credibility.
Richard Benedetto is a retired USA Today White House correspondent and columnist. He now teaches media and politics at American University and in The Fund for American Studies program at George Mason University. Follow him on Twitter @benedettopress.
This isn't show and tell, it's debate. If you can't use your words, you lose. If you can't read and absorb what you read, and successfully defend it, you lose.
Maybe you should. After failing 1000 times at debate, perhaps it would be an indicator to you that you should change your ways.I don't keep score. The choice to remain ignorant is your own.
Maybe you should. After failing 1000 times at debate, perhaps it would be an indicator to you that you should change your ways.
You do realize links are just appeal to authority, right? I mean, this is like debate 101.
Use your words Jack, if you can. Just try it, you might like it.
Advice from a friend who was a champion debater: "Debates are won in the library." You don't know what you're talking about.
So we can expect you to be in the library and not here. Happy news.