Lawmakers held a hearing on white nationalism. On YouTube ...

[Oborosen]

Yes the question was serious, but I'll rephrase it to make it easier for you:

Assume that owning __[fill in the blank]__ was "legal", but no one would talk to anyone who owned __[fill in the blank]__, and no one would sell anything to anyone who owned __[fill in the blank]__, and no one would buy anything from anyone who owned __[fill in the blank]__, and everyone completely ignored (except to insult) anyone who owned __[fill in the blank]__, would there be any need for a law that "outlawed owning __[fill in the blank]__"?
​

Please note that the key element in that question IS "would there be any NEED" and IS NOT "would it be a good idea to pass a law that there isn't actually any need for, but which makes a statement about what we believe".

No rephrasing necessary. The question itself just seemed a bit too contrived.

If our country was still accepting of slaver. Then this would no issue for those who lived in such a country. The idea that no one would talk to them, or do business with them simply because they were doing something that was still completely legal is a notion that just doesn't make sense. Because how did they purchase their slaves in the first, if that were the case?

Now say if the country was more closes aligned to the way ours works now and it was only at the state level that slavery remained legal. Then yes, that would be more applicable. Though I doubt it would affect much if people, who didn't participate in such a practice, treated them as such. Because they would still have their own internal system to work with. Not an easily maintained system. But one that could exist with some effort.

Also, passing laws without the need for one is something that the united states has actually been doing for some time. We have states where it's illegal to eat ice cream in bed, so such an occurrence is not unusual.

 

[AGENT J]

So when no bank in the country will hold an account with you, because of things you haven't event said and paper currency is already in a decline of usage.

You don't see an issue stemming from such an predicament?

LMAO



Tell me more!!!

opcorn2:

 

[Oborosen]

LMAO

View attachment 67254828

Tell me more!!!

opcorn2:

So being childish is your only response. Good to see that you haven't changed J.

 

[AGENT J]

So being childish is your only response. Good to see that you haven't changed J.

Translation: You still cant support your claims with any facts or rational honest intellectual reason so you deflect. Yep things haven't changed one bit!
Let me know when your nutcase conspiracy theories become true!

 

[Obscurity]

Neither is white nationalism. But, you already knew that.

This is the usual socialist tactic intended to create a domestic enemy. Stalin and Hitler did the same thing.

Typical fascist ideal too. Your boy did iy with Mexican and South american immigranta.

You look foolish for posting this.

 

[apdst]

Typical fascist ideal too. Your boy did iy with Mexican and South american immigranta.

You look foolish for posting this.

Unfortunately for you, the illegal border crossings are a real problem. Unless you support open borders. Communist want open borders.

 

[OlNate]

Seeing as all you can do is attack me for something that is a reasonable stance on violence. It's apparent that you actually don't even remotely know what I meant, or you don't care for that matter.

Either way, it doesn't bother me. I'm not going to give one violent group preferential treatment over the other.

You're right, I don't care, as when I put the hypothetical I told you you couldn't pick none.

It's ok, we all recognize the color yellow when we see it.

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

Oh, without question, political islamism is based on absolute theocratic authoritarian totalitarianism.
I didn't bring that up, but I may be remiss in not including it.

Does "political Islamism" bear the same relationship to "Islam" as "political Christianism" bears to "Christianity" or that "political Judaism" bears to "Judaism"?

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

Mark stated that Black nationalist are a threat and you responded with saying that they are if you are a white nationalist.

The implication there, is that white nationalist are the only ones who need to fear black nationalist.

Which is why I asked for you to explain why that was.

You drew the conclusion that because I said (in effect) "Is A then B." that what I had said "If and only if A then B.".

I didn't.

If the original statement had been "White Nationalists are NOT a threat." and I had responded "If you are a Black Nationalist, they are.", would you have concluded that I had said "White Nationalists are threat ONLY IF you are a "Black Nationalist"?

 

[joko104]

LMAO

View attachment 67254828

Tell me more!!!

opcorn2:

A lot of people post extra non-creative stupid stuff online thinking it is funny like the picture you posted. All that guy in the picture did is declare he is an extreme beta personality of no creativity and even less intelligence.

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

No rephrasing necessary. The question itself just seemed a bit too contrived.

If our country was still accepting of slaver. Then this would no issue for those who lived in such a country. The idea that no one would talk to them, or do business with them simply because they were doing something that was still completely legal is a notion that just doesn't make sense. Because how did they purchase their slaves in the first, if that were the case?

All true, and all equally not dealing with the substance of the question.

Now say if the country was more closes aligned to the way ours works now and it was only at the state level that slavery remained legal. Then yes, that would be more applicable. Though I doubt it would affect much if people, who didn't participate in such a practice, treated them as such. Because they would still have their own internal system to work with. Not an easily maintained system. But one that could exist with some effort.

Still not dealing with the substance of the question.

Also, passing laws without the need for one is something that the united states has actually been doing for some time. We have states where it's illegal to eat ice cream in bed, so such an occurrence is not unusual.

Still not dealing with the substance of the question.

PS - I am well aware of the fact that laws that aren't needed get passed. That wasn't what I was asking about. I was asking if there WOULD BE A NEED for the law.

PPS - I a case where "no one would talk to anyone who owned __[fill in the blank]__, and no one would sell anything to anyone who owned __[fill in the blank]__, and no one would buy anything from anyone who owned __[fill in the blank]__, and everyone completely ignored (except to insult) anyone who owned __[fill in the blank]__," it would be incredibly difficult for anyone who owned __[fill in the blank]__ to "network" with anyone else who owned __[fill in the blank]__ - wouldn't it?

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

Unfortunately for you, the illegal border crossings are a real problem. Unless you support open borders. Communist want open borders.

Did you know that "Communist" does NOT mean

A person who does not belong to the most reactionary wing of the Republican Party and/or who does not worship Donald John Trump.
​

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

Does "political Islamism" bear the same relationship to "Islam" as "political Christianism" bears to "Christianity" or that "political Judaism" bears to "Judaism"?

Absolutely. The Christian Taliban are the Dominionist/Reconstructionist sect who are trying to take over the Republican Party.
In Israel, the Haredi serve much the same function as the islamists serve. They are every bit as extreme.

 

[apdst]

Did you know that "Communist" does NOT mean

A person who does not belong to the most reactionary wing of the Republican Party and/or who does not worship Donald John Trump.
​

The stupidity of your posts never ceases to astound. :lamo

 

[Acadia]

When's the hearing black nationalism going to take place?

Boom. How about the hearing on black on black violence?

 

[Acadia]

Neither is white nationalism. But, you already knew that.

This is the usual socialist tactic intended to create a domestic enemy. Stalin and Hitler did the same thing.

AOC is taking it to an art form.

 

[Acadia]

This is a good example of a "big lie". A falsehood which people believe because it is so often repeated.

Goebbells would be proud of the "white nationalism" bogeyman which the Left has created.

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

The stupidity of your posts never ceases to astound. :lamo

Well then, maybe you had better learn the meanings of the terms that you use.

Did you know that "stupidity" does NOT mean "a statement or point that I didn't want to hear because it makes either me or my position look incredibly stupid"?

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

Boom. How about the hearing on black on black violence?

Possibly you could explain to me how

"Since you didn't mention 'Problems B through Z" I am going to pretend 'Problem A' doesn't exist."​

does something that even remotely resembles making sense.

Then again, possibly you can't.

 

[apdst]

Well then, maybe you had better learn the meanings of the terms that you use.

Did you know that "stupidity" does NOT mean "a statement or point that I didn't want to hear because it makes either me or my position look incredibly stupid"?

Maybe you oughta follow your own advice.

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

Maybe you oughta follow your own advice.

Reduced to "I know you are, but what am I?" level are you?

 

[apdst]

Reduced to "I know you are, but what am I?" level are you?

That's the game you wanna play. Take your medicine.

 

[Obscurity]

Unfortunately for you, the illegal border crossings are a real problem. Unless you support open borders. Communist want open borders.

I don't want open borders. I just don't agree with fear mongering nonsense.

 

[dixon01767]

Does "political Islamism" bear the same relationship to "Islam" as "political Christianism" bears to "Christianity" or that "political Judaism" bears to "Judaism"?

Not familiar enough with Judaism to know but a big NO in regards to Christianity. Only the written doctrine of Islam dictates the form of government and law to be applied. Christian doctrine doesnt concern itself with such matters.

 

[apdst]

I don't want open borders. I just don't agree with fear mongering nonsense.

You support building a wall?