• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Key Witness To Alleged Brett Kavanaugh Assault, Refuses To Testify

Sabre

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 26, 2017
Messages
14,395
Reaction score
16,968
Location
Southern California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Mark Judge, the man who Christine Blasey Ford has said was in the room while Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh allegedly assaulted her when they were in high school, has declined to speak before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Democrats had called for him to do so. But in a statement to committee chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Judge claimed he had no memory of the incident and declined to speak publicly about the allegation.

“I did not ask to be involved in this matter nor did anyone ask me to be involved,” Judge said in a letter signed by his lawyer on Tuesday. “The only reason I am involved is because Dr. Christine Blasey Ford remembers me as the other person in the room during the alleged assault.”

“In fact, I have no memory of this alleged incident,” he added. “Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Ford’s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”

The last sentence quoting Mark Judge says it all. Read once that the longer something passes, close to 80% of people think they remember clearly but, they misremember or "remember" things that never happened.


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...kavanaugh-hearing_us_5ba15f8ae4b04d32ebfd8c01
 
The last sentence quoting Mark Judge says it all. Read once that the longer something passes, close to 80% of people think they remember clearly but, they misremember or "remember" things that never happened.


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...kavanaugh-hearing_us_5ba15f8ae4b04d32ebfd8c01

Literally, Ms. Ford can testify to all sorts of salacious allegations.

Then all Mr. Kavanaugh has to state is something along the lines of: "I have no recollection of any party that I encountered Ms. Ford at; I never engaged in any of the acts she alleges occurred; I know nothing more of the matter."

Any attempt at probing questions from the Democrats should result in something along the lines of: "I cannot answer because I was not involved in and have no knowledge of the matter."

End of story.

Hearing over, move on to the confirmation.
 
Last edited:
Literally, Ms. Ford can testify to all sorts of salacious allegations.

Then all Mr. Kavanaugh has to state is something along the lines of: "I have no recollection of any party that I encountered Ms. Ford at; I never engaged in any of the acts she alleges occurred; I know nothing more of the matter."

End of story.

Hearing over, move on to the confirmation.

that is even if she shows up.
She has still not accepted the invitation to appear.

If she doesn't appear it is case closed just like in a normal court with no accuser.
 
Judge needs to be subpoenaed and must testify before the committee.

I wonder why he is so afraid to say under oath what he is saying in the media?

Perhaps his book confessing to being a blackout drunk in high school has something to do with it?
 
The last sentence quoting Mark Judge says it all. Read once that the longer something passes, close to 80% of people think they remember clearly but, they misremember or "remember" things that never happened.


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...kavanaugh-hearing_us_5ba15f8ae4b04d32ebfd8c01

More than one study has shown that the level of confidence you have in a memory does not correlate with the accuracy of the memory. Often times it is the reverse because the memories we think we remember the most are the ones we recall the most often. But everytime you recall a memory your brain then “refiles” it away, and just like the telephone game little errors can get inserted with each remembering.

I’m not saying that is what happened in this case, just a bit of interesting info.
 
Judge needs to be subpoenaed and must testify before the committee.

I wonder why he is so afraid to say under oath what he is saying in the media?

Perhaps his book confessing to being a blackout drunk in high school has something to do with it?

I wouldn’t want to testify in front of the whole country about something so heated either. If he supports her story crazies on the right will make his life miserable. If he supports the nominee’s story then crazies on the left will make his life miserable. I’m sure he already been pulled into this way more than he wants.
 
I wouldn’t want to testify in front of the whole country about something so heated either. If he supports her story crazies on the right will make his life miserable. If he supports the nominee’s story then crazies on the left will make his life miserable. I’m sure he already been pulled into this way more than he wants.

Judge knows that his book will be a road map to his own public destruction and he wants to avoid this while simply coming down on Kavanaughs side without going through any rough waters.

His stance wants to have it both ways and that should NOT happen.
 
Judge needs to be subpoenaed and must testify before the committee.

I wonder why he is so afraid to say under oath what he is saying in the media?

Perhaps his book confessing to being a blackout drunk in high school has something to do with it?

His book being likely where Ford got her story from, using it as a convenient way to name another supposed attacker..........
 
His book being likely where Ford got her story from, using it as a convenient way to name another supposed attacker..........

Why would a college professor subject herself to death threats for herself and her family necessitating relocation, coupled with vile slanders from random internet assholes who assume anybody is interested in their conspiracy laden fantasy world?
 
Why would a college professor subject herself to death threats for herself and her family necessitating relocation, coupled with vile slanders from random internet assholes who assume anybody is interested in their conspiracy laden fantasy world?

To ruin a man's life because he's a republican and she's a democrat?

Or the same reason that chica made false accusations and ruined the lives of numerous young men at Duke. Etc..

Hell, she'll probably even get a book deal out of it, because this is going to go nowhere because she has no evidence, and now is refusing to testify. Whether Kavanaugh gets confirmed or not, she'll be getting well more than her 15 minutes of fame.
 
that is even if she shows up.
She has still not accepted the invitation to appear.

If she doesn't appear it is case closed just like in a normal court with no accuser.

if she doesn't show up-she and her Soros slurping attorney should be charged with contempt of congress and feinswine given the boot
 
To ruin a man's life because he's a republican and she's a democrat?

Or the same reason that chica made false accusations and ruined the lives of numerous young men at Duke. Etc..

Hell, she'll probably even get a book deal out of it, because this is going to go nowhere because she has no evidence, and now is refusing to testify. Whether Kavanaugh gets confirmed or not, she'll be getting well more than her 15 minutes of fame.

turds like Colbert will be having her on TV for the next 6 months
 
His book being likely where Ford got her story from, using it as a convenient way to name another supposed attacker..........

sure - because her life is so much better now being on the run from right wing crazies. :doh

Got it. :roll:
 
if she doesn't show up-she and her Soros slurping attorney should be charged with contempt of congress and feinswine given the boot

Feinstein came out yesterday and said she wasn't sure if the accusations were true.
WTH. why would you as a person not knowing if they are true come out and help accuse someone?

ol yea because you are a piece of **** human being. (being feinstein) welcome dan rather 3.0
honestly the senate should pass a censor bill against her for false accusations without evidence or possible contempt of congress.

time to end this nonsense.

ol yea she won't testify unless there is a full FBI investigation which there isn't going to be one.
she has been given multiple dates and times that she could come and testify and she is still balking at it.

like we knew we would. if i was grassley i wouldn't let this charade continue any longer.

Kavanaugh is innocent. There is no evidence that he did anything and the only other person there that
would know what happens says nothing happened.
 
sure - because her life is so much better now being on the run from right wing crazies. :doh

Got it. :roll:

SHe's gonna have a nice cozy book deal no matter which way the Kavanaugh vote goes. If he gets rejected she gets to play the conquerin hero that saved us from the evil generic conservative who wants to grab your uterus or something. If he gets voted in, she gets to play the sad victim that the evil nasty republican men didn't listen to.
 
The real question is why do people have the nerve to threaten death to someone?

What is wrong with everyone.
 
that is even if she shows up.
She has still not accepted the invitation to appear.

If she doesn't appear it is case closed just like in a normal court with no accuser.

Her lawyer says no deal, without an FBI investigation. That could change, I guess.
 
Why would a college professor subject herself to death threats for herself and her family necessitating relocation, coupled with vile slanders from random internet assholes who assume anybody is interested in their conspiracy laden fantasy world?

How do we know she's getting death threats? She already lied about the sexual assault.
 
How do we know she's getting death threats? She already lied about the sexual assault.

I think it would be pretty simple to prove if they are getting death threats. Also, you can't say she lied for sure, you have no evidence it's a lie. She -may- have lied, but she did pass a polygraph.

I'd say indications are the assault was real. I think the jury is out on if it was Kavanaugh or mistaken identity, which is a very real possibility.
 
The real question is why do people have the nerve to threaten death to someone?

What is wrong with everyone.

I don't recall anyone on this board doing that and right now we have no idea who has done that in the RW and if they are far right, far left or liberals trying to bolster the twit's smear job
 
Her lawyer says no deal, without an FBI investigation. That could change, I guess.

Gee, why do I smell $$$ involved here? FBI investigation, delayed confirmation, all based on what? A #metoo at the last moment, while the DNC ignores another recent accuser, only that one was against one of their own....

God, I am getting so sick of this.....
 
I don't recall anyone on this board doing that and right now we have no idea who has done that in the RW and if they are far right, far left or liberals trying to bolster the twit's smear job

What's the purpose in name calling? Why insist on labeling her and dipping into identity politics?
 
What's the purpose in name calling? Why insist on labeling her and dipping into identity politics?

get back to me when you take issue with the crap thrown at Trump and his supporters. She's a pawn and a tool of some of the most disgusting pieces of excrement to ever fill the senate with their stench
 
get back to me when you take issue with the crap thrown at Trump and his supporters. She's a pawn and a tool of some of the most disgusting pieces of excrement to ever fill the senate with their stench

In case you missed it, I just defended Trump supporters in another post.

Moreover, I find it highly distasteful to assume my stance as a new member of the forum. You don't know my "post" history. Additionally, while I disagree with Trump being fit to be president, and I disagree with plenty his administration has done, I do support small facets of it.

You need to step outside the box and stop viewing the world as black and white.
 
Why would a college professor subject herself to death threats for herself and her family necessitating relocation, coupled with vile slanders from random internet assholes who assume anybody is interested in their conspiracy laden fantasy world?

Trump Derangement Syndrome.
 
Back
Top Bottom