• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kathy Griffin Is Both Hillary Clinton And Donald Trump

You repeating the same dumb thing after it was exposed only makes you look even worse.

You should be flattered. I learned the technique from you, although I'm a long way off from the perfection you have achieved.

;)
 
You should be flattered. I learned the technique from you, although I'm a long way off from the perfection you have achieved.

;)

flattery will only get you a look of scorn.
 
The nonsense that any contact between team Trump and the Russians "must have been" about collusion to rig the POTUS election is pure fiction. After over nine months of investigation it would seem obvious that theory is without merit. We how are being treated to the "horror" of talks between team Trump and the Russians after the election in the news - as if that also had some impact on the election.

This whole thing seems to hinge on two facts: Trump wanted Hillary to lose the election and some Russians wanted Hillary to lose the election. Where the facts end and the theory begins is that team Trump and team Russia having common goals required (or even implied) any need to collude.

Why lie then...and, why pressure Comey into dropping the investigation? Inquiring minds have every reason in the world to allege the worst here.
 
I'm hoping that you see the irony of Griffin claiming that she's the victim here and that Trump and his family are trying to "destroy" her.

I am not a Griffin apologist. What she did was incredibly stupid and in incredibly poor taste.

Now tell me... does her stupidity warrant death threats?
 
Why lie then...and, why pressure Comey into dropping the investigation? Inquiring minds have every reason in the world to allege the worst here.

You can allege whatever you want - to take it beyond that requires actual proof. Didn't Comey state that he felt no pressure to drop the investigation?
 
You can allege whatever you want - to take it beyond that requires actual proof. Didn't Comey state that he felt no pressure to drop the investigation?

We'll see next week. His previous quote seems to have been taken in a very narrowly defined context.

Trump appears to have said something along the lines of, "Drop this **** or else." A week later, Comey is fired, and Trump himself said it was because of the Russia thing. Doesn't look good. Nope. Not at all.
 
The "bad politician" beat out 16 candidates for the Republican nomination and won the general election.

Winning an election has nothing to do with being a good politician. Winning the minds and/or hearts of your constituents? Sure. But it requires absolutely no competence in the actual duties of running a municipality/ county/ state/ country.

Hopefully you grasp this distinction.
 
"Alleged" vs four real deaths, including the first death of a United States ambassador in 33 years. In other words, no comparison.

Not to mention it was four unnecessary deaths. Hillary's state department provided less security for the ambassador and diplomats in Libya then she did to the embassy in Paris, which is not in a war zone.
 
As I said, Obama was in the 40's almost the whole eight years.

.....and always much higher than Trump's ever has been or ever will be. On June 3, 2009, Obama's approval rating was 63%, compared to Trump's, as of this date, of 39%. Rarely does an approval rating climb up to the approval rating of the honeymoon period.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

Obama had a hard time governing when his approval rating was in the 40's.... and his rarely dipped below 44%. Trump's future ain't so bright (nor is he, for the matter)
 
I must agree..... making people feel bad for Trump is truly an amazing accomplishment.

Personally, I feel bad for all the liberals who still have not healed to the point of reflecting inward and working out why they lost in 2016, 2014, and 2010. But carry on.
 
Personally, I feel bad for all the liberals who still have not healed to the point of reflecting inward and working out why they lost in 2016, 2014, and 2010. But carry on.

Everybody I know fully is informed as to the reason the DEM ticket lost in 2016 - the Electoral College thwarted the will of the people.
 
Not to mention it was four unnecessary deaths. Hillary's state department provided less security for the ambassador and diplomats in Libya then she did to the embassy in Paris, which is not in a war zone.

Yawn, this has been litigated, re-litigated and discussed a nauseum. 4 people died in a conflict zone, not exactly a big deal, but the Cons sure tried to make it one... and, in the end, it lead to Clinton's defeat. But, its kindergarten in comparison to the allegations and possible allegations America is wrestling with now.
 
I am not a Griffin apologist. What she did was incredibly stupid and in incredibly poor taste.

Now tell me... does her stupidity warrant death threats?

No it does not...nor does it warrant her blaming the Trump family for her own stupidity.
 
We'll see next week. His previous quote seems to have been taken in a very narrowly defined context.

Trump appears to have said something along the lines of, "Drop this **** or else." A week later, Comey is fired, and Trump himself said it was because of the Russia thing. Doesn't look good. Nope. Not at all.

You are half making it up as you go along now.
 
And it is that economic growth we were laboring under that led voters to put Donald Trump in the White House.

It really wasn't. It was uniformed voters' memories of how bad the recession was and their incorrect belief that Big O caused it.
 
Everybody I know fully is informed as to the reason the DEM ticket lost in 2016 - the Electoral College thwarted the will of the people.

Nonsense. The very purpose of the EC was to make it possible to win without a majority of anything except EC votes.
 
.....and always much higher than Trump's ever has been or ever will be. On June 3, 2009, Obama's approval rating was 63%, compared to Trump's, as of this date, of 39%. Rarely does an approval rating climb up to the approval rating of the honeymoon period.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

Obama had a hard time governing when his approval rating was in the 40's.... and his rarely dipped below 44%. Trump's future ain't so bright (nor is he, for the matter)

It's quite easy for a librul politician to garner 63% approval ratings when the pollsters are biased to begin with. And RealClearPolitics was humiliated over it's giving Trump a 16% chance of winning the White House.
 
Originally Posted by Moderate Right View Post

As I said, Obama was in the 40's almost the whole eight years.


.....and always much higher than Trump's ever has been or ever will be. On June 3, 2009, Obama's approval rating was 63%, compared to Trump's, as of this date, of 39%. Rarely does an approval rating climb up to the approval rating of the honeymoon period.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

Obama had a hard time governing when his approval rating was in the 40's.... and his rarely dipped below 44%. Trump's future ain't so bright (nor is he, for the matter)

Obama was over 50% for two of his eight years (the first 12 months, the last 7 months, and 6 months in the middle). While that's definitely a minority of the time, I'd hardly call 6 out of 8 years "almost the whole eight years".
 
Everybody I know fully is informed as to the reason the DEM ticket lost in 2016 - the Electoral College thwarted the will of the people.

You are still on that kick, huh? Both campaigns ran under the system that has existed from the beginning. There is no clause in the constitution that suggests that the electoral college results are disqualified if the winner does not win the popular vote. How much will it take for you to grasp the concept of the "United States of America"? Don't like the Electoral College system? Tough! You will just have to live with it.
 
Yawn, this has been litigated, re-litigated and discussed a nauseum. 4 people died in a conflict zone, not exactly a big deal, but the Cons sure tried to make it one... and, in the end, it lead to Clinton's defeat.

It is very much a big deal considering our ambassador was killed along with 3 security people attempting to protect him. And there is the fact that the consulate begged and begged and begged for more security, which fell on deaf ears regarding Hillary. It was as noted a while ago in a war zone. The problem was almost no security.



But, its kindergarten in comparison to the allegations and possible allegations America is wrestling with now.

No....what's kindergarten is the Russian collusion fantasy that the left dreamed up the moment Trump jokingly asked for Russian help finding Hillary Von Pantsuit's missing 30,000 emails.
 
Nonsense. The very purpose of the EC was to make it possible to win without a majority of anything except EC votes.

And it provided the mechanism to thwart the will of the people while failing to do what it promised to do in the first place by the Founders.

Thats known as a LOSE/LOSE proposition.
 
You are still on that kick, huh? Both campaigns ran under the system that has existed from the beginning. There is no clause in the constitution that suggests that the electoral college results are disqualified if the winner does not win the popular vote. How much will it take for you to grasp the concept of the "United States of America"? Don't like the Electoral College system? Tough! You will just have to live with it.

You say that is if there was a choice. "Oh lets see, shall we run using the Electoral College or shall we run using the same mechanism that every other elected office in America uses? "

I don't think that option was ever presented. The evils of the system are the evils of the system and no amount of "tough" changes that.
 
And it provided the mechanism to thwart the will of the people while failing to do what it promised to do in the first place by the Founders.

Thats known as a LOSE/LOSE proposition.

Then propose an amendment to change that "failed" system. Meanwhile, it remains the law of the land.
 
It is very much a big deal considering our ambassador was killed along with 3 security people attempting to protect him. And there is the fact that the consulate begged and begged and begged for more security, which fell on deaf ears regarding Hillary. It was as noted a while ago in a war zone. The problem was almost no security.





No....what's kindergarten is the Russian collusion fantasy that the left dreamed up the moment Trump jokingly asked for Russian help finding Hillary Von Pantsuit's missing 30,000 emails.

Sorry to interrupt you time on Brietbart or InfoWars. Carry on.
 
Back
Top Bottom