Other Holy Books?
This naturally leads us to ask about other books that claim to be inspired by God. Two that people often ask about are the Quran and the book of Mormon. The Quran (or Koran) is the basis of Islam, the religion practiced by Muslims. The book of Mormon is one of several books considered as holy by Mormons, who refer to themselves as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.[2] Both the Quran and the book of Mormon claim to be inspired by God. Do we accept their self-claim?
In these cases, we have good reasons to believe otherwise. These books are strikingly different from those that God inspired. As one example, consider the way in which these books were written. Recall that God used primarily eye-witnesses to historical events recorded in Scripture, and He used multiple authors so that their writings would corroborate each other. However, the information in the Quran is the work of one man, Mohammad, who did not witness the events the book describes. Likewise, the book of Mormon is apparently the work of one man, Joseph Smith, who did not witness the events described therein.
Joseph Smith lived from 1805 to 1844. He was put on trial in 1826 for being a “glass-looker” (a con-artist), which calls into question his reliability. Is the book of Mormon simply another one of Smith’s cons? Smith claimed that he was visited by an angel named “Moroni” in the year 1823, who gave him the location of buried golden plates that contained sacred writings. Smith claimed that he retrieved these plates in 1827, but the angel told him not to show anyone, but to translate and publish them. Unlike the text of Scripture, these plates are not open to objective inspection by others. Instead, we are forced to take the word of a man charged with being a con-artist.
The plates were supposedly a record of indigenous early Americans, written in a language that Joseph Smith called “reformed Egyptian.” Smith was allegedly gifted with the ability to read and divinely translate these plates into English. Smith claimed that the angel took back the plates once Smith had completed his translation of them. So we have no way of checking Smith’s translation, and no empirical evidence that such golden plates ever actually existed. This of course stands in stark contrast to the thousands of ancient copies we have of the biblical books in their original languages, subject to objective examination by all. Further, there is no historical evidence for a language called “reformed Egyptian.” In contrast, the Bible was written in known languages: Hebrew and Greek. Unlike the Bible, the book of Mormon has no corroboration from other books written by other authors to its supposed history, and no eye-witnesses to the events recorded therein. This book has none of the characteristics of God’s Word, and instead has all the marks of being the invented fiction of one man.
The Quran likewise appears to be the work of one man: Mohammad. He lived from around the year A.D. 570 to 673 and considered himself a prophet of God. As a child, Mohammad apparently had some limited exposure to Christianity and the Bible. He would often go to a cave to pray, and when he was 40, he reported being visited by the angel Gabriel who gave him revelation from God. He then began preaching these revelations to others. Mohammad’s companions eventually wrote down these revelations, which became the Quran. The Quran is divided into chapters called “Surahs” and often refers to God as “Allah.” Unlike the biblical authors, Mohammad did not witness the alleged events recorded in the Quran. And, like the book of Mormon, the Quran does not enjoy the corroboration of other authors. Again, this text has none of the characteristics of divine revelation, and appears to be the invention of one man.
So the Quran and the book of Mormon each appear to have an entirely human origin without any factual basis. They are not eye-witness accounts of history. They have none of the properties normally associated with God’s Word.