Just one question for the gun control types

[Rich2018]

...while my example was not a red flag law, it is an example of how red flag laws are abused.

Then do as you're requested and provide an example of a "red-flag" law and an instance where you perceive it to have been abused

Uber requires money, a credit or debit card, a computer or phone. Its plausible that people could miss court date because of this....

Friends, relatives...?

Please give an example where someone claimed they missed a court date because they lacked the financial resources to attend

You are talking out of your @ss my friend

I bet your tune would change if the vast majority of voter fraud was benefitting the republican.

1. You would lose that bet as I am for cracking down hard on all voting fraud, indeed all fraud for that matter
2. Are you saying that voting fraud only benefits the Democrats ? I think you've just exposed your true colors there

Same crap with giving citizenship to illegals. You probably support it being a liberal. If those new voter were conservatives lol I dont think so.

Why wouldn't they be ?

Doesn't your hero in the White House say he's done more for blacks that any president ever ?
If he's so good for America, why wouldn't every immigrant vote for him and Republicans ???

 

[Fledermaus]

Some people are too dumb to know even what they posted a few posts ago. I will repost it for you

"in the case of the British, they liberated themselves from no-one."

For your information many "British" were taken prisoner and liberated. In addition, as Fledermaus points out several British possessions were also occupied and had to be liberated.

A real man would admit he had posted something really stupid. But I will wait for your response, because I know you are not man enough to own up.

We forget the entire Asian colonies in the whole liberation from tyranny thing.

He won't admit it. That's not what he does. Prove him wrong eight ways to Sunday and he will simply repeat the error and insist he is right.

 

[Rich2018]

Interesting, Rich isn't aware that the British fought against Germany and Axis in WWI and WWII.

"Though if a certain poster is reading, yes the British owned Channel Islands were indeed occupied as were some areas of the British empire"

 

[Fledermaus]

Singapore.

 

[BahamaBob]

Singapore.

Why do you insist on bringing facts into the discussion. Rich likes it better when he can make up his own facts.

 

[Rich2018]

Why do you insist on bringing facts into the discussion. Rich likes it better when he can make up his own facts.

Especially as he gets so confused by them:


His post:

Channel Islands, Kingdom of Egypt (Still essentially under British rule), Malta was in siege, etc. And they fought the Japanese for colonial possessions in Asia.

My original post:

No of course not

In both cases Britain declared war on Germany

Britain did not, however, liberate itself (or was liberated by anyone else for that matter) from "tyranny".


(Though if a certain poster is reading, yes the British owned Channel Islands were indeed occupied as were some areas of the British empire.

And to compound his embarrassment:

Not just the Channel Isles as noted.

So once again, the salient part:

(Though if a certain poster is reading, yes the British owned Channel Islands were indeed occupied as were some areas of the British empire).

You know "some areas of the British empire", like Singapore for instance ? (the Channel Islands weren't part of the British Empire)



You were saying something about "facts" and "confusion" ???


Checkmate.

 

[RF667799]

Especially as he gets so confused by them:


His post:




My original post:





And to compound his embarrassment:





So once again, the salient part:




You know "some areas of the British empire", like Singapore for instance ? (the Channel Islands weren't part of the British Empire)



You were saying something about "facts" and "confusion" ???


Checkmate.

Why are you quoting a poster and removing the link back to the posts you're quoting? That's some seriously dishonest ****. Cowardly as well, since he won't be notified of your quoting him.

 

[Daddyo]

Then do as you're requested and provide an example of a "red-flag" law and an instance where you perceive it to have been abused




Friends, relatives...?

Please give an example where someone claimed they missed a court date because they lacked the financial resources to attend

You are talking out of your @ss my friend




1. You would lose that bet as I am for cracking down hard on all voting fraud, indeed all fraud for that matter
2. Are you saying that voting fraud only benefits the Democrats ? I think you've just exposed your true colors there




Why wouldn't they be ?

Doesn't your hero in the White House say he's done more for blacks that any president ever ?
If he's so good for America, why wouldn't every immigrant vote for him and Republicans

I'm sorry that you liberals are incapable of taking that leap of faith when you have been proved wrong. I provided evidence that laws are used/manipulated by people to achieve an objective outside the true intent of said law. Now I'm certain that you are not so ignorant that you are incapable of connecting the dots and understanding that they are being abused in the same manner with red flag laws. So you asking for specific examples of red flag laws being abused is just your way of attempting to escape being wrong. Ignorant is the only other possibility.

You now claim to abhor vote fraud yet you just said nothing should be needed to vote. Proving you are who you are is the only way to insure the integrity of our elections.

Owning a gun is a right yet people are forced to provide ID to exercise said right.

And no I dont think that Republicans are innocent. I DO think that democrats benefit from the fraud much more.

Again you are well aware that minorities pull the lever for the democrat at much higher levels. Trump has done more for blacks than Obama. Still they will vote for the democrat at higher levels. Completely stupid IMO.

You already know this but again it's your way of attempting to side step the fact that you are wrong.

 

[Rich2018]

I'm sorry that you liberals are incapable of taking that leap of faith when you have been proved wrong.

1. You don't sound very sorry
2. Please advise when liberals were proved wrong on gun control

I provided evidence that laws are used/manipulated by people to achieve an objective outside the true intent of said law.

And would any of the people be conservatives ?

Like the Supreme Court ruling that the 2nd amendment meant all citizens* could own guns regardless of military age/fitness qualifications ?

(* in case a certain poster is reading "all" would preclude those people deemed too young as well as those deemed mentally unfit, or who have been convicted of a felony)

Now I'm certain that you are not so ignorant that you are incapable of connecting the dots and understanding that they are being abused in the same manner with red flag laws.

So you think "red flag" laws are routinely abused or are you talking about isolated incidents

So you asking for specific examples of red flag laws being abused is just your way of attempting to escape being wrong. Ignorant is the only other possibility.

No, it's just a way of illustrating that you are guilty of holding a prejudiced opinion, that is not actually based on fact
ie: a personal opinion that you cannot support with evidence

You now claim to abhor vote fraud yet you just said nothing should be needed to vote.

I do oppose voting fraud but also I am fully against anyone being denied a vote simply because they have no ?ID. IMO all that is required is that they say who they are

People who impersonate others to vote are criminals IMO and should be charged and convicted with a felony

Proving you are who you are is the only way to insure [SIC] the integrity of our elections.

Absolutely 100% NOT !!!

The way we ensure the legitimacy of our elections is to increase voter turn out

If anyone is stupid enough to impersonate someone else, then jail them. They won't do it again.

Owning a gun is a right yet people are forced to provide ID to exercise said right.

But we want to dissuade people from buying guns and not make it as easy as buying candy
We want to ENCOURAGE people to vote

And no I dont think that Republicans are innocent. I DO think that democrats benefit from the fraud much more.

Why would you think that ?

Are you saying that voting Democrat is in the interest of people who're not rich ?

Again you are well aware that minorities pull the lever for the democrat at much higher levels. Trump has done more for blacks than Obama. Still they will vote for the democrat at higher levels. Completely stupid IMO.

That's Trump's boldest lie yet, clearly you've been lapping what he says. I think he actually said he's done more for blacks that any other president. So, I'm guessing you're just parroting Trump's lies without even the semblance of a fact check


'“This may well be the president’s most audacious claim ever,” said Michael K. Fauntroy, a professor of political science at Howard University. “Not only has he not done more than anybody else, he’s done close to the least.”


Trump’s False Claim That ‘Nobody Has Ever Done’ More for the Black Community Than He Has - The New York Times

You already know this but again it's your way of attempting to side step the fact that you are wrong.

No, it was a bald face lie by Trump.

So what exactly has he done ?
In YOUR mind that is.