• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

It's the Guns[W:1198, W:1943]

Status
Not open for further replies.
vegas giants said:
Guns are far more dangerous to be around than cars. That is a stone cold fact
Click to expand...
perhaps for you and others like you that don't know straight up about them. My guns have NEVER proven to be a danger to me or anyone else in the house, nor do I know of anyone that's had a problem and I know a lot of gun owners.
 
zsu2357 said:
In this case you came across the acronym for Battalion Landing Team and it sounded cool so you ran with it.
Click to expand...

Or Basic Leadership Training which I went thru. LOL
 
apdst said:
This is where the anti-gunners stop lying and admit that an all out ban has been the objective all along.
Click to expand...

Give me a break. Are guns banned in other western democracies that have gun control? Just because I support the notion of speed limits, driver's tests, seat belts and traffic lights, doesn't mean I want to ban cars. Get as many well-regulated guns as you want, keep them locked up, and use them responsibly for protection and joyfully for sport.
 
Nickyjo said:
Give me a break. Are guns banned in other western democracies that have gun control? Just because I support the notion of speed limits, driver's tests, seat belts and traffic lights, doesn't mean I want to ban cars. Get as many well-regulated guns as you want, keep them locked up, and use them responsibly for protection and joyfully for sport.
Click to expand...

So what regulations do you think are lacking?
 
Nickyjo said:
Give me a break. Are guns banned in other western democracies that have gun control? Just because I support the notion of speed limits, driver's tests, seat belts and traffic lights, doesn't mean I want to ban cars. Get as many well-regulated guns as you want, keep them locked up, and use them responsibly for protection and joyfully for sport.
Click to expand...

The UK bans handguns. Australia bans handguns larger than .38/9mm and semiautomatic rifles and shotguns. Italy bans handguns in 9mm and rifles in .5.56 NATO and 7.62 NATO. Canada bans handguns with barrels under 4". There is no western democracy that hasn't banned some type of firearm in common, lawful use in the US.
 
Rucker61 said:
The UK bans handguns. Australia bans handguns larger than .38/9mm and semiautomatic rifles and shotguns. Italy bans handguns in 9mm and rifles in .5.56 NATO and 7.62 NATO. Canada bans handguns with barrels under 4". There is no western democracy that hasn't banned some type of firearm in common, lawful use in the US.
Click to expand...

Even the US. So what
 
Rucker61 said:
The UK bans handguns. Australia bans handguns larger than .38/9mm and semiautomatic rifles and shotguns. Italy bans handguns in 9mm and rifles in .5.56 NATO and 7.62 NATO. Canada bans handguns with barrels under 4". There is no western democracy that hasn't banned some type of firearm in common, lawful use in the US.
Click to expand...

None of that is my problem, because I'm an American. Thank God.
 
vegas giants said:
I agree. You could become suicidal tomorrow. I knew you would get there
Click to expand...
Then you are content to judge people for what they MIGHT do and take away a right based solely on that? Let me pose a hypothetical:Suppose the state just summarily(no evidence)decided that you were no longer fit to drive(granted driving is a privilege)or take part in any public activities because you MIGHT be a danger to yourself and/or others?Would you be down for that?
Let's have a real answer.
 
zsu2357 said:
Then you are content to judge people for what they MIGHT do and take away a right based solely on that? Let me pose a hypothetical:Suppose the state just summarily(no evidence)decided that you were no longer fit to drive(granted driving is a privilege)or take part in any public activities because you MIGHT be a danger to yourself and/or others?Would you be down for that?
Let's have a real answer.
Click to expand...

Good luck with that, you're dealing with a mudpuddle-deep shill.
 
zsu2357 said:
Then you are content to judge people for what they MIGHT do and take away a right based solely on that? Let me pose a hypothetical:Suppose the state just summarily(no evidence)decided that you were no longer fit to drive(granted driving is a privilege)or take part in any public activities because you MIGHT be a danger to yourself and/or others?Would you be down for that?
Let's have a real answer.
Click to expand...

Uh. The state does that all the time to old people. Lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom