Isn’t it time to identify Obama as the New Nixon, but multiples worse

[Gaugingcatenate]

Don't be ridiculous. In this case, everybody ever prosecuted by the government pleads guilty, right? Nope. Wrong.
And the problem with his son, that's because the son is another crook.

He didnt have an attorny present and simply misremembered exactly what all was said in a matter in which he had the full right and capacity to say, as incoming national security advisor, what was necessary in the matter. Most certainly nothing of grave national jeopardy.

Soley, as judge TS Ellis properly framed it in the Manafort case, to put the squeeze on him, to get him to not just sing, but to get him to compose, to frame an apparently squeaky clean President Donald J Trump.

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/05...-flynn-prepared-testify-appeared-forthcoming/

Pientka, who has never spoken to a journalist, according to several sources with knowledge, is expected to speak to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee if subpoenaed to discuss the circumstances regarding his role in the investigation into Flynn and the interview that he was a part of at the White House. Highly classified information regarding Flynn’s conversation with Kislyak was leaked to columnist David Ignatius of the Washington Post in January, 2017 which spurred the controversy around Flynn and eventually led to his firing in February, 2017.

It’s this reporters understanding that Pientka will account for what Flynn said in the interview and will give context to the FBI’s accusation that he lied during the interview. If asked, Pientka will also give his personal opinion as to whether or not that was actually the case. He will also discuss how forthcoming Flynn was about very specific sensitive information that Flynn could not have possibly known the investigators already knew, which may give additional insight into Flynn’s veracity and willingness to tell the truth.

there’s an ongoing disagreement between congressional Republicans and former FBI Director James Comey over what Comey told Members of Congress about that FBI interview with Flynn. The House Intelligence Committee says Comey told the House in a briefing last year “the agents…discerned no physical indications of deception. They didn’t see any change in posture, in tone, in inflection, in eye contact. They saw nothing that indicated to them that he knew he was lying to them.” That comes from a transcript of the briefing. Earlier this month, Sen. Grassley sent a letter which said Comey told Senators the same thing at a separate briefing. The Senate briefing was not transcribed but there was a law enforcement officer there taking notes. His notes indicated that Comey said the FBI agents who interviewed Flynn, “saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying.”

 

[JackA]

What it's time for is for political obsessives to get their heads out of their ideologies and see the world.

 

[AlbqOwl]

OK. If you say so.

And I say yet again; Move on President Obama will never run for office again, he can't, find someone else to hate. President Obama has never even been called into question about anything of the like; and won't be, because he did nothing of the sort. Djt is blowing smoke out his ass; sane people know this.

I don't hate President Obama. Never have. Most likely never will. But I don't want anybody to get away with blatant illegal acts that undermine the Constitution and hurt the country just because they kept it under wraps until they could be safely out of office.

 

[Irwin Corey]

I don't hate President Obama. Never have. Most likely never will. But I don't want anybody to get away with blatant illegal acts that undermine the Constitution and hurt the country just because they kept it under wraps until they could be safely out of office.

Fair enough, but you want the Mueller investigation quashed?

 

[AlbqOwl]

Fair enough, but you want the Mueller investigation quashed?

I don't know. I do know what they are doing to innocent people is unconscionable. And I do think that should be investigated. I do think there is enough question now about their methods and their motives to justify an investigation of the DOJ past and present, of the FBI past and present, and the Mueller investigation.

 

[poweRob]

What’s inane about it?

He and host of criminals in the intel services abused their power to spy on Trump and his campaign.

What funny is the Leftists have done a 180.

In the 60’s they didn’t trust the state. Now, they love it and want to help cover its criminalities.

Conspiracy Theory forum is that way ------------------------->

 

[poweRob]

Who is Sessions persecuting? He's barely doing his job much less persecuting anyone.

*Prosecuting

 

[biff_poindexter]

Nixon covered for guys who broke into a hotel to get info from DNC offices.

He tried to cover-up the crime. He shouldn’t have.


Obama had to know the intel services were spying on Trump’s campaign. Wiretaps... informant/spies... unmaskings of Americans... just a whole panalopy of criminalities involving an opponent and his campaign during a presidential election.

He used the FBI, CIA, DoJ as tools like some 3rd World Banana Republic ****hole Dictator.

Obama hasn’t just slipped slightly below Nixon, he set a standard of criminality that is so low, absurd, and vile it will likely never be, and hopefully never be surpassed.

Where people once said “Nixonian” to call someone corrupt, we can now turn to calling such corruption Oba-manian... Barackistic.

Yea, Obama is worse than Nixon because ...stuff

 

[SonOfDaedalus]

You are far too partisan to take seriously.

Your username clearly defines you as a rabid partisan. No one believes you can convince a guy called “ObamacareFail” that anything pro-Obama is true.

Being anti-Obama is your very identity. You’re a true partisan loyalist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[SonOfDaedalus]

I don't know. I do know what they are doing to innocent people is unconscionable. And I do think that should be investigated. I do think there is enough question now about their methods and their motives to justify an investigation of the DOJ past and present, of the FBI past and present, and the Mueller investigation.

What about the judges who approved the warrants? Should they be investigated because you don’t agree with their decisions?

The bottom line is we have judges to prevent abuses. If you have a problem then your problem is not just with the FBI but also the judges.

Were the judges part of the conspiracy? Do you have more insight than the judges who reviewed hundreds of documents?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[AlbqOwl]

What about the judges who approved the warrants? Should they be investigated because you don’t agree with their decisions?

The bottom line is we have judges to prevent abuses. If you have a problem then your problem is not just with the FBI but also the judges.

Were the judges part of the conspiracy? Do you have more insight than the judges who reviewed hundreds of documents?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Certainly some of the evidence presented to the judges to get the warrants should be subject to scrutiny.

 

[Irwin Corey]

I don't know. I do know what they are doing to innocent people is unconscionable. And I do think that should be investigated. I do think there is enough question now about their methods and their motives to justify an investigation of the DOJ past and present, of the FBI past and present, and the Mueller investigation.

SO, you're all for investigating Democrats but have a problem if Republicans are? Got it.

 

[AlbqOwl]

SO, you're all for investigating Democrats but have a problem if Republicans are? Got it.

I didn't say that though did I. But nice try and have a pleasant afternoon.

 

[SonOfDaedalus]

Certainly some of the evidence presented to the judges to get the warrants should be subject to scrutiny.

That’s what the judges are for. If you have evidence that they falsified evidence on their FISA applications then present it. But you have no such evidence.

The FBI followed the law and legally obtained warrants after a judge reviewed the evidence.

If you have a problem, take it up with the judges or change the law.

The FBI obeyed the law and caught a bunch of criminals involved in the Trump campaign.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Irwin Corey]

I didn't say that though did I. But nice try and have a pleasant afternoon.

Yeah, you did; have a nice life!

 

[MAGAnificent]

Your username clearly defines you as a rabid partisan. No one believes you can convince a guy called “ObamacareFail” that anything pro-Obama is true.

Being anti-Obama is your very identity. You’re a true partisan loyalist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is very narrow minded thinking on your part. My user name signifies my opposition to a piece of **** legislation that canceled my health insurance 5 years ago. Anything else you try to make of it is all in your mind.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

 

[Sampson Simpson]

Nixon covered for guys who broke into a hotel to get info from DNC offices.

He tried to cover-up the crime. He shouldn’t have.


Obama had to know the intel services were spying on Trump’s campaign. Wiretaps... informant/spies... unmaskings of Americans... just a whole panalopy of criminalities involving an opponent and his campaign during a presidential election.

He used the FBI, CIA, DoJ as tools like some 3rd World Banana Republic ****hole Dictator.

Obama hasn’t just slipped slightly below Nixon, he set a standard of criminality that is so low, absurd, and vile it will likely never be, and hopefully never be surpassed.

Where people once said “Nixonian” to call someone corrupt, we can now turn to calling such corruption Oba-manian... Barackistic.

LOL, My god, you people are an absolute joke. Obama was scandal free. The right wing nuts just can't stand how much better a black man was at being president compared to the 2 white republican jackasses who were president before and after

Obama is Nixon LOL Did your computer change all the Trumps to Obamas?

 

[ataraxia]

Thread: Isn’t it time to identify Obama as the New Nixon, but multiples worse

No. Not even close.

Trump, on the other hand....

But nice try. Not.

 

[veritas1]

*Prosecuting

Except that the post I responded to said "persecuting his political enemies".

 

[Vadinho]

Posts like this reflect the sentiments of the Trump world to a tee. This is what happens when you listen to propaganda for years on end. The top post, the lead on this thread, is a lie, every sentence is based upon a lie in one form or another. When people say the left must listen to Trump and his supporters it means that we must willingly listen to liars.

 

[Somerville]

Posts like this reflect the sentiments of the Trump world to a tee. This is what happens when you listen to propaganda for years on end. The top post, the lead on this thread, is a lie, every sentence is based upon a lie in one form or another. When people say the left must listen to Trump and his supporters it means that we must willingly listen to liars.

Listen to liars and the deluded who believe the liars. Sadly it seems to be working with a large part of the American citizenry

 

[MAGAnificent]

OK, you **** your friends and I'll **** mine but let's not **** each other.

We've both presented our differing views, fair enough. But you are as right bent as they come, denying it only makes you look foolish. Okay?

I don't think you are able to work out the difference. You probably think anyone a milimeter to the right of Karl Marx is of the extreme right. I am a mainstream conservative independent who supports the mainstream conservative republican platform which the RINO establishment assholes campaign on then ignore. Okay?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk