- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Messages
- 27,254
- Reaction score
- 9,350
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
It seems to be a battle of sources over a battle of science. AGW is clearly flawed, even some of the people working for government paid for organizations admit that. Honestly, do you think NASA and other organizations would give true and accurate climate reports? Obama is about to shell into NASA millions in funding to find out more about global warming and how we cause it. Do you think they would give up that money and tell the truth? It's essentially bribing science. Many times the popular belief was wrong. Forever people believed in spontaneous generation, and if you doubted you were an unscientific fool. Scientists also widely believed that protein was the molecule for genetic inheritance... We should learn from history.
There are many that concur with with your conspiracy theories. What blows that for me is that ALL of the world's credible scientific institutions have been in general consensus on ACC for years, with evidence growing stronger each year.
I just don't think its possible that all of these scientific organizations have been conspiring for decades.
And the conspiracy would have to go back to all of our science instructors that taught us about the effect of greenhouse gases.
That's more than I can swallow.
Last edited: