You asked the question, buddy. Don't get mad that someone answers.
You got that notion by inflating what people said. There's no way around this, literally not one person has ever claimed that there has never been a successful prosecution of election fraud. What people were saying is that actual voter fraud is very rare.
If you cannot tell the difference between "very rare" and "has never happened before," I don't know what to tell you.
A couple low-level IRS agents were inappropriately, and possibly illegally, targeting certain groups. IRS administration eventually discovered this and ordered them to stop.
If this is evidence of "this administration" being corrupt, is a Republican being convicted of election fraud evidence that the GOP is corrupt to an awe inspiring level?
You seem to be dying to reveal the Republican who was convicted of Voter fraud, so please do so.
Under Nixon, it was the Committee to Re-Elect that did all the damage that eventually led to the White house.
This is very likely the very same kind of thing happening here. You just have to be impressed by the parallels.
The History Place - Impeachment: Richard Nixon
Article 1:
Section 1:
(1) Making or causing to be made false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employes of the United States.
Section 6:
(6) Endeavoring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States.
Section 8:
(8) Making false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation has been conducted with respect to allegation of misconduct on the part of personnel of the Executive Branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the Re-Election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct; or
Section 9:
(9) Endeavoring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favored treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.
Article 2:
Section 1:
(1) He has, acting personally and through his subordinated and agents, endeavored to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, confidential information contained in income tax returns for purposes not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigation to be initiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.
Section 4:
(4) He has failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed by failing to act when he knew or had reason to know that his close subordinates endeavored to impede and frustrate lawful inquiries by duly constituted executive; judicial and legislative entities concerning the unlawful entry into the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee, and the cover-up thereof, and concerning other unlawful activities including those relating to the confirmation of Richard Kleindienst as attorney general of the United States, the electronic surveillance of private citizens, the break-in into the office of Dr. Lewis Fielding, and the campaign financing practices of the Committee to Re-elect the President.
Article 3:
Article 3: Contempt of Congress.
In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, contrary to his oath faithfully to execute the office of the President of the United States, and to the best of his ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, had failed without lawful cause or excuse, to produce papers and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, on April 11, 1974, May 15, 1974, May 30, 1974, and June 24, 1974, and willfully disobeyed such subpoenas. The subpoenaed papers and things were deemed necessary by the Committee in order to resolve by direct evidence fundamental, factual questions relating to Presidential direction, knowledge or approval of actions demonstrated by other evidence to be substantial grounds for impeachment of the President. In refusing to produce these papers and things, Richard M. Nixon, substituting his judgement as to what materials were necessary for the inquiry, interposed the powers of the Presidency against the lawful subpoenas of the House of Representatives, thereby assuming to himself functions and judgments necessary to the exercise of the sole power of impeachment vested by Constitution in the House of Representatives.