- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,077
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
That entire post was just your ignorant point of view based on an idiotic premise. Its interesting how you think the right to her body includes the killing of her offspring though. I wonder if any other right includes such a thing? Does other parts of the right to her body have to rely on broken logic like yours? Its interesting how property doesn't include control of access if you are public business(you know that thing that doesn't exist in the private sector but you think it does), but the right to a womans body includes the right to kill. How very interesting..
translation: you cant defend against it, its ok
those are the facts, period, if you disagree please use some facts to dispove it
so i guess you think its ok for me to force you to risk your life against your will then right? LMAO
give it up dude, bring facts to the table or stay home, disprove what i said instead of trying to deflect and talk circles, honest people dont buy it.
not my fault i acknowledge BOTH lives and you ignore one, thats your issue LOL