• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Independents souring on impeachment

It is hard to read this as anything but a warning: New polling suggests Democrats' impeachment push could alienate key voters

"Data exclusive to Vanity Fair shows impeachment could be a losing issue for Democrats hoping to recruit Independents in 2020. “Lots of people who don’t like Trump who are still prepared to vote for him,” says one political science expert."

"Independents are also one of the keys, if not the key, to the 2020 elections. According to Gallup, self-identified Independents make up roughly 40% of the electorate. Many of these voters are closet partisans, reliably voting for one party or another, but enough of them—call it somewhere between 10% or 20%—are true “persuadables” or “movables” whose votes are up for grabs. Even a modest shift in allegiance among this group could determine the outcome next November."
 
Oh, I have no doubt that the cultists in the Senate will do everything that they can to subvert / impede the process.

why do you continue to call GOP senators cultists but not the TDS crowd as the same? Did the Democrats subvert and impede the Clinton impeachment in the senate?
 
“[9/9/19, 12:47:11 AM] Bill Taylor: As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.”

On page nine of the list of text messages between Volker, Taylor, Sondland, Yermak, and Giuliani on the Ukraine meeting and trumps attempt to extort political investigations from Zelensky

https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-con...03-19.chairmen-letter-on-state-dept-texts.pdf

And Sondland's response was "WTF???"

btw, is it a coincidence that Taylor met with Schiffty's aide, Thomas Eager, August 25th while they were both in Ukraine?
 
Independents souring on impeachment underscores risk for Democrats | TheHill

What will Nancy Pelosi decide to do? Allow the Schiff-show to continue moving forward to taking an impeachment vote while Democrats in key races possibly risk losing Independents or call it a day? Seems to me losing millions of independents and more moderate Democrats while pissing off the far leftist side of the base, almost guarantees Trump the win. Does she continue to the impeachment vote or is she smart enough to know the writing is on the wall?

Nancy doesn't have any choice. She's screwed if she continues and she's screwed if she stops.
 
why do you continue to call GOP senators cultists but not the TDS crowd as the same? Did the Democrats subvert and impede the Clinton impeachment in the senate?

They are cultists. I understand that Tweety fans have agreed to use Tweety's own "I know you are, but what am i?" deflection strategy, but I reject it as bull****. If they want to be in a cult, that's fine, but many of us are going to point it out.
 
Oh, I have no doubt that the cultists in the Senate will do everything that they can to subvert / impede the process.

Why wouldn't they? They, like the opportunistic partisan party Dems.. pay attention to their base. Do you really delude yourself into believing, that Nancy Pelosi is not worried about losing Independents? The Republicans will do what 95% of Trump's base wants, and now they have to consider that independents are flipping toward not being for an impeachment vote and subsequent conviction.

An impeachment is political. The Democrats are purely motivated by a politically driven agenda to oust Trump, and have been since the day he took office. Some might want to label them the cult, politics of destruction cultists.

Since the left needs the independents to beat Trump and company 2020, we have to seriously consider if Nancy will carry on with the Schiff-show.
 
Last edited:
They are cultists. I understand that Tweety fans have agreed to use Tweety's own "I know you are, but what am i?" deflection strategy, but I reject it as bull****. If they want to be in a cult, that's fine, but many of us are going to point it out.

OK, we're "cultists" according to you.

Sticks and stones.
Got anything to say about the actual topic now?
 
OK, we're "cultists" according to you.

Sticks and stones.
Got anything to say about the actual topic now?

TD can argue for himself, I hope. Also, I didn't call you anything.
 
TD can argue for himself, I hope. Also, I didn't call you anything.

Who said he couldn't?

I'm calling you out on your blanket condemnation, so yes, your deflections above aside, you did call us all "cultists".
Originally Posted by Helix View Post
They are cultists. I understand that Tweety fans have agreed to use Tweety's own "I know you are, but what am i?" deflection strategy, but I reject it as bull****.
 
Who said he couldn't?

I'm calling you out on your blanket condemnation, so yes, your deflections above aside, you did call us all "cultists".
Originally Posted by Helix View Post
They are cultists. I understand that Tweety fans have agreed to use Tweety's own "I know you are, but what am i?" deflection strategy, but I reject it as bull****.

Only you know if you're a cultist. To paraphrase Gone With the Wind, frankly, I don't give a damn.
 
They are cultists. I understand that Tweety fans have agreed to use Tweety's own "I know you are, but what am i?" deflection strategy, but I reject it as bull****. If they want to be in a cult, that's fine, but many of us are going to point it out.

in other words, the bitter losers who started whining about Trump's election since 2016 are basically insulting millions of people due to their pique over losing.

we all knew that, of course, but it is funny. I hope Trump wins for several reasons, one of them being watching the Trump haters really go nuts. None of the clowns running as dems are anything other than tax hiking, gun banning pimps who promise people the wealth of others
 
in other words, the bitter losers who started whining about Trump's election since 2016 are basically insulting millions of people due to their pique over losing.

we all knew that, of course, but it is funny. I hope Trump wins for several reasons, one of them being watching the Trump haters really go nuts. None of the clowns running as dems are anything other than tax hiking, gun banning pimps who promise people the wealth of others

I'm sorry that you're worried about one of them confiscating your arsenal. That's not really my hobby, but I doubt that it's going to happen unless you were to post violent things on the internet. Then you might trip Tweety's proposal to take the guns without due process.
 
Nice deflection and you do give a damn about the "cultists". :lol:

No, I don't give a damn about your personal status. Hope that clears it up.
 
I'm sorry that you're worried about one of them confiscating your arsenal. That's not really my hobby, but I doubt that it's going to happen unless you were to post violent things on the internet. Then you might trip Tweety's proposal to take the guns without due process.

nice deflection. I just like the judges Trump has appointed so far. I am hoping Amul Thapar (6th Circuit-former colleague of mine) gets on the court. He'd be the first Southern-Asian as well. He also didn't go to one of the usual law schools-but UC-Berkley is top drawer.
 
Why wouldn't they? They, like the opportunistic partisan party Dems.. pay attention to their base. Do you really delude yourself into believing, that Nancy Pelosi is not worried about losing Independents? The Republicans will do what 95% of Trump's base wants, and now they have to consider that independents are flipping toward not being for an impeachment vote and subsequent conviction.

An impeachment is political. The Democrats are purely motivated by a politically driven agenda to oust Trump, and have been since the day he took office. Some might want to label them the cult, politics of destruction cultists.

Since the left needs the independents to beat Trump and company 2020, we have to seriously consider if Nancy will carry on with the Schiff-show.

As an attempt to get my thread back on topic, .... Helix, why the crickets from you?
 
Looks like right wing media is busy propping up its troops!
 
Yes, there was. And no, you don't get to say there wasn't. And, No, you don't get to have an opinion on a fact.

wow congrats, you have made a great analogy for how the communist chinese leadership sounds!
 
Um, yeah we do...lol

No, you don't.

A fact is a FACT. It's not "Open to interpretation", especially given how idiotic the right wing has been of late with your INSANE conspiracies.
 
Welp, that's the ballgame, folks. I guess that we should just drop the whole thing and let presidents commit extortion and bribery at will with no consequences. Who wants to call Pelosi and give her the bad news?

Not it

Or you could continue to sit around like a mob of bobble-head dolls and nod dutifully to every belch of swamp gas Pelosi, Schiff and their gang of useful idiots in the media emit.
 
wow congrats, you have made a great analogy for how the communist chinese leadership sounds!

A fact is a fact is a fact.

You can't "have an opinion on it."

Ukraine did not meddle.

That's a fact. You can think otherwise, but there is no evidence to support it.

You lot have completely demolished any sense of logic being a part of our body politic.
 
Independents souring on impeachment underscores risk for Democrats | TheHill

What will Nancy Pelosi decide to do? Allow the Schiff-show to continue moving forward to taking an impeachment vote while Democrats in key races possibly risk losing Independents or call it a day? Seems to me losing millions of independents and more moderate Democrats while pissing off the far leftist side of the base, almost guarantees Trump the win. Does she continue to the impeachment vote or is she smart enough to know the writing is on the wall?

Nancy has no good options. As soon as she allows the vote, then the whole matter is out of the Dems' hands and the Senate will take it up in January right dab smack in the middle of the Dem primaries. They'll recall Liz Warren, Sanders, Booker, Harris and Klobucher back to Washington where they will have to sit, day after day, while Biden and Buttigeig are out campaigning. They might even miss Super Tuesdey. And in the end Trump will win a political victory when the Senate fails to convict

Even if Nancy doesn't allow the vote, then it looks horrible for the Dems. Trump wins by default.

Her best strategy is to continue the hearings but keep postponing the vote indefinitely. Maybe until after the election, at which point it becomes moot.

I bet Nancy wishes she had a time machine and could go back and stop the madness before it started.
 
Back
Top Bottom