• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Incredible Bias in all western media - it will end soon

Thoreau72 said:
I don't know where they went Mike, and I don't know where "the passengers" went. The perpetrators have not told us that. All that is certain is that the aircraft that struck the towers were not the aircraft the official story says, and no airliner at all crashed in Shanksville and the Pentagon.

We do know that according to depositions taken for the Moussaoui trial, testimony from UAL dispatchers and supporting documents, show the aircraft being UA93 that day was still transmitting in the ARINC system 30 minutes after the official story said it crashed in Shanksville, and it was somewhere in Illinois.
Click to expand...

Thanks for a reply.
Please provide the links to the stated premise regarding UA93. I am curious on the sources of your information.

Their are sites with information that shows the ACARS myth has been proven wrong . Others testified a different findings that radar, ACARS, etc support 93 did crash in Shankville.
 
Last edited:
Thoreau72 said:
We do know that according to depositions taken for the Moussaoui trial, testimony from UAL dispatchers and supporting documents, show the aircraft being UA93 that day was still transmitting in the ARINC system 30 minutes after the official story said it crashed in Shanksville, and it was somewhere in Illinois.
Click to expand...

Complete garbage as explained by the link below, complete with screenshots of manuals.
Return to Sender - booNyzarC's Blog - Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums
 
Quag said:
there were 4 phantom planes destroyed on 911 but no actual planes as to RADAR according to our resident "flight instructor" ATC traisn with injects on live RADAR because not only is it easy to do (not) safety has never been an ATC priority
Have you seen behind the curve? They do a good job explaining why sheeple believe CT BS
Click to expand...

Oops! I stated three in error.
 
zyzygy said:
Presenting evidence to Thoreau is a waste of time.
Click to expand...

I'm on ignore with him so he has a reason not to respond to me. He got tired of being proven wrong so that's his out.
 
mike2810 said:
Thanks for a reply.
Please provide the links to the stated premise regarding UA93. I am curious on the sources of your information.

Their are sites with information that shows the ACARS myth has been proven wrong . Others testified a different findings that radar, ACARS, etc support 93 did crash in Shankville.
Click to expand...

Mike, there are "sites" that "show" whatever you want to read. You are certainly welcome to spend your time there.

I knew on day one there was no crashed airliner at Shanksville, and so did the guys in the news helicopter I was watching in real time. So did Wally Miller after he came out of the field, and he told that to the cameras. This is like The Emperor's New Clothes. There was no crashed airliner there that day, and anybody being honest with himself knew that. I've seen too many crashes myself.

So when the discovery process of the ONLY trial to result from 911 showed that the airliner that wasn't there was actually in Illinois still transmitting (computer to computer) in the ARINC system, it made perfect sense.

I learned that many years ago, and I'm not about to spend one skinny minute helping you to understand it, because you are deeply in denial and have been for as long as we've been posting back and forth.

I've studied the cell phone system in enough detail to hold a now expired federal license for Amateur Radio, and I've done my own experiments with 2 different cell phone systems in 2003, to understand that the cell phone stories circulated by the government and media could not possibly have been true. You reject all that, and that further demonstrates your cognitive dissonance.

Viva Cognitive Dissonance, Michael. Wilful ignorance is bliss. Enjoy!
 
Thoreau72 said:
Mike, there are "sites" that "show" whatever you want to read. You are certainly welcome to spend your time there.
Click to expand...

Yes the conspiracy theory sites where you get all your misinformation is a prime example of this

I knew on day one there was no crashed airliner at Shanksville, and so did the guys in the news helicopter I was watching in real time. So did Wally Miller after he came out of the field, and he told that to the cameras. This is like The Emperor's New Clothes. There was no crashed airliner there that day, and anybody being honest with himself knew that. I've seen too many crashes myself.
Click to expand...
Wow you are actually destroying your own pathetic backstory here as you have repeatedly said you believed the "official story" until you met some stranger in a bar years later who told you it was a giant govt conspiracy which of cours ebeing a non critical thinking conspiracy nut you believe 100%


So when the discovery process of the ONLY trial to result from 911 showed that the airliner that wasn't there was actually in Illinois still transmitting (computer to computer) in the ARINC system, it made perfect sense.
Click to expand...
Only it wasn't transmitting as you would understand if you had any knowledge about how the system works

I learned that many years ago, and I'm not about to spend one skinny minute helping you to understand it, because you are deeply in denial and have been for as long as we've been posting back and forth.
Click to expand...
The only person in denial here is you who denies reality

I've studied the cell phone system in enough detail to hold a now expired federal license for Amateur Radio, and I've done my own experiments with 2 different cell phone systems in 2003, to understand that the cell phone stories circulated by the government and media could not possibly have been true. You reject all that, and that further demonstrates your cognitive dissonance.
Click to expand...
Looking up CT sites that do nothing but spew BS is not studying it is just a form of confirmation bias you are wrong on this as you are on pretty much everything.
Viva Cognitive Dissonance, Michael. Wilful ignorance is bliss. Enjoy!
Click to expand...

As you demonstrate on a daily basis
 
Quag said:
Yes the conspiracy theory sites where you get all your misinformation is a prime example of this


Wow you are actually destroying your own pathetic backstory here as you have repeatedly said you believed the "official story" until you met some stranger in a bar years later who told you it was a giant govt conspiracy which of cours ebeing a non critical thinking conspiracy nut you believe 100%



Only it wasn't transmitting as you would understand if you had any knowledge about how the system works


The only person in denial here is you who denies reality


Looking up CT sites that do nothing but spew BS is not studying it is just a form of confirmation bias you are wrong on this as you are on pretty much everything.


As you demonstrate on a daily basis
Click to expand...

Done his own experiments, lol.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Mike, there are "sites" that "show" whatever you want to read. You are certainly welcome to spend your time there.

I knew on day one there was no crashed airliner at Shanksville, and so did the guys in the news helicopter I was watching in real time. So did Wally Miller after he came out of the field, and he told that to the cameras. This is like The Emperor's New Clothes. There was no crashed airliner there that day, and anybody being honest with himself knew that. I've seen too many crashes myself.

So when the discovery process of the ONLY trial to result from 911 showed that the airliner that wasn't there was actually in Illinois still transmitting (computer to computer) in the ARINC system, it made perfect sense.

I learned that many years ago, and I'm not about to spend one skinny minute helping you to understand it, because you are deeply in denial and have been for as long as we've been posting back and forth.

I've studied the cell phone system in enough detail to hold a now expired federal license for Amateur Radio, and I've done my own experiments with 2 different cell phone systems in 2003, to understand that the cell phone stories circulated by the government and media could not possibly have been true. You reject all that, and that further demonstrates your cognitive dissonance.

Viva Cognitive Dissonance, Michael. Wilful ignorance is bliss. Enjoy!
Click to expand...

Your personal opinion is just that. Not worth much.
It has been interesting your reluctance to post what sources you use in your investigation. This is a debate site. You seem reluctant to prove your points. I made the mistake to believe that maybe you would be willing to have a discussion on 9/11 and the use of nukes. Have a good one T72

Your personal insult is noted. Like your believe on 9/11, you have no proof of anyone having Cognitive Dissonance.
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
Your personal opinion is just that. Not worth much.
It has been interesting your reluctance to post what sources you use in your investigation. This is a debate site. You seem reluctant to prove your points. I made the mistake to believe that maybe you would be willing to have a discussion on 9/11 and the use of nukes. Have a good one T72

Your personal insult is noted. Like your believe on 9/11, you have no proof of anyone having Cognitive Dissonance.
Click to expand...

Bolded is incorrect he has proven that he himself suffers from this
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom