• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Incompetence is the rule with Trump. Here is proof!

Trump hired a lot of people who turned around and stabbed him in the back.

What part of "and Congress" do you not understand.

btw, moving goal posts now? First you talk about 3%...now it's 6%. Make up your mind, eh?



Trump hired a lot of people who turned around and stabbed him in the back.

Just stop right there!!!
Trump ONLY hires the best!



What part of "and Congress" do you not understand.

The part that Passed Tax reform that was supposed to be the greatest thing since slice bread remember?
 
Trump hired a lot of people who turned around and stabbed him in the back.

What part of "and Congress" do you not understand.

btw, moving goal posts now? First you talk about 3%...now it's 6%. Make up your mind, eh?

btw, moving goal posts now? First you talk about 3%...now it's 6%. Make up your mind, eh?

Hey guy, It was Trump who mentions that he could get 6% growth, not I(Rolling eyes)
 
Mark Cuban said the stock market would tank if Trump got elected in 2016.

He was dead wrong. China Phase 2 deal will be done after the Corona Virus dies down.

You don't follow news much, do you?

Xi himself said that Phase 2 will not happen until after the next election. In addition, Phase 1 was but a fraction of what Trump said he would accept. It was basically a deal that helped China much more than the U.S.

Some skeptical observers have noted that the deal leaves in place most of the trade-war tariffs that continue to burden both consumers and producers. There are also concerns that major issues in the trade relationship, such as the role that state enterprises and subsidies play in China’s economy, are being pushed off for future discussions. But a more fundamental problem is that the framework for this deal is conceptually flawed, which will result in unrealistic expectations and unfulfilled commitments.


So there we have it. The long-awaited shiny new trade deal with China, inked at a ceremony at the White House on Wednesday in the interstitial space before the Senate impeachment trial dominates the news cycles. If you detect a note of skepticism already creeping in, it’s because this pseudo-deal deserves not just skepticism but calling out as a dramatic failure of U.S. policy that will have lasting and deleterious effects. The deal simply restores the U.S.-China relationship to where it was pre-President Donald Trump, declares victory in areas that don’t matter as much as they did and has cost the U.S. billions in the meantime.

Simply stated, Trump did not accomplished anything that he promised he would accomplish. He created the problem and then tried to end it simply to win re-election. We are worse off than when he started the problem and he calls it a win.

Geez! and people like you believe it. Geez again!
 
Hey guy, It was Trump who mentions that he could get 6% growth, not I(Rolling eyes)

hahah ahh yes...Trump should have gotten to 6% in under 3 years while dems are attacking him instead of working with him.
Now...I know how lefties love charts. Please post the chart of Obamas yearly GDP.
 
hahah ahh yes...Trump should have gotten to 6% in under 3 years while dems are attacking him instead of working with him.
Now...I know how lefties love charts. Please post the chart of Obamas yearly GDP.

Let's face it. Trump has not done what he promised to do and he has accomplished nothing of consequence anywhere. The economy is the only thing that Trump can beat his chest for and even then only in a very small way. When it comes to GDP and manufacturing, we are no better off than we were under Obama (and he had an economic disaster to fix) and worse off that 90% of the presidents before him.

Wages are no better than they have been for the past 45 years (considering inflation) and though unemployment is lower, the problem is that most people that are working are in either part time jobs or jobs that are under their ability to do and have no growth involved, meaning not the job they want. They are working simply to pay bills.

The Stock Market has going higher under Trump but then that only helps the rich. In fact, it can be said the rich have benefited the most under Trump but then, how does that help the rest of US?

Under Trump things are worse as far as unity, as far as world respect, as far as being the leaders of climate change, as far as moral standards, as far as equal justice for all, as far as being a shining example of what to aspire to, as well as mass killings, as far a truth being important, as far as health care, as far as competent people running our country, and as far as concentrating on things that are important to all of us such as infrastructure spending and betterment of our lives.

In very simple words, Trump has not been a president that has taken us higher but one that has made things worse.

See if you have the ability to prove me wrong in what I just said. Show me where we are better off that ever before (as Trump constantly says).
 
Last edited:
Just stop right there!!!
Trump ONLY hires the best!





The part that Passed Tax reform that was supposed to be the greatest thing since slice bread remember?

Tax Reform was very good...responsible for much of the growing economy, in combination with other stuff. But that Tax Reform wasn't exactly what Trump wanted. He had to take what they gave him.

Seriously...you should really try to get away from the spinning talking points. Reality is much different.
 
Hey guy, It was Trump who mentions that he could get 6% growth, not I(Rolling eyes)

sigh...

Never mind.

Talking to a wall isn't my thing.

You are dismissed.
 
Bloomberg is not corrupt as corrupt people do not give away billions of dollars to charity and even if he is, Trump is 10 times more corrupt, meaning that if you are against corruption (as you seem to state), you should not be "for Trump".

As far as keeping Trump in office, it will extend the economic growth for another year or two but then be followed by a major collapse as was seen in 2008 because unrestrained greed always brings collapse. In looking at everything else, Trump will bankrupt this nation in everything else such as belief in the law, unity of the people, honor, respect for one another, justice, and trying to do what is best for the nation and not what is best for oneself. That kind of bankruptcy will bring this nation down and make us a banana republic.

That's a complete load of rubbish.
 
That's a complete load of rubbish.

That is your opinion, which is not backed by facts or even by the majority.

Sorry, you failed to make your point.
 
That is your opinion, which is not backed by facts or even by the majority.

Sorry, you failed to make your point.

You have made over 10 predictions since Trump got elected the market would tank. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.
 
You have made over 10 predictions since Trump got elected the market would tank. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.

No, I have not made any specific time frame decisions about the market tanking. I am a trader and I make decisions about peaks and valleys and I have been good at it. The market at "some point" will tank because of what Trump has done, but the tax cut did give companies a lot of extra money for a time and that has been supporting the market rise. Nonetheless and like in 2007 and 2008, greed does bring consequences and those that foresaw those consequence coming in 2005 and 2006 were ultimately right, though not in 2005 or 2006.

Once again, you are not showing knowledge or ability to read what a person says in a way that it enters your mind the way it was written. That is called bias. You only see what you want to see and not the truth.

and by the way, if I was so wrong, please explain how I made money trading last year when the market went mostly up!

Changes
Status of account for 2007: Profit of $9,758 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2008: Profit of $14,704 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2009: Profit of $7,523 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2010: Profit of $24,045 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2011: Profit of $3,616 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2012: Profit of $3,399 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2013: Profit of $15,886 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2014: Profit of $21,221 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2015: Profit of $19,190 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2016: Loss of $15,134 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2017: Loss of $9,666 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2018: Profit of $1,637 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted
Status of account for 2019: Profit of $13,051 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted
 
Last edited:
No, I have not made any specific time frame decisions about the market tanking. I am a trader and I make decisions about peaks and valleys and I have been good at it. The market at "some point" will tank because of what Trump has done, but the tax cut did give companies a lot of extra money for a time and that has been supporting the market rise. Nonetheless and like in 2007 and 2008, greed does bring consequences and those that foresaw those consequence coming in 2005 and 2006 were ultimately right, though not in 2005 or 2006.

Once again, you are not showing knowledge or ability to read what a person says in a way that it enters your mind the way it was written. That is called bias. You only see what you want to see and not the truth.

and by the way, if I was so wrong, please explain how I made money trading last year when the market went mostly up!

Changes
Status of account for 2007: Profit of $9,758 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2008: Profit of $14,704 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2009: Profit of $7,523 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2010: Profit of $24,045 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2011: Profit of $3,616 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2012: Profit of $3,399 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2013: Profit of $15,886 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2014: Profit of $21,221 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2015: Profit of $19,190 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2016: Loss of $15,134 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2017: Loss of $9,666 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2018: Profit of $1,637 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted
Status of account for 2019: Profit of $13,051 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted

Hey, can't help it if you cheat buddy. If you have information not available to the general public, it is called an unfair advantage, right?
 
Hey, can't help it if you cheat buddy. If you have information not available to the general public, it is called an unfair advantage, right?

Yeah, except that my service is public. I write a newsletter every week and give mention for trades to do that week "in advance" to subscribers to the service. These are the results of all the mentions given over 13 years. I given desired entry points, stop loss points and objectives in advance and you can actually go back to each one of the newsletters and see these trades mentioned "before the fact". There is no cheating, lying, or making up results. It is all there in black and white to be seen and checked.

Sorry, but you whiffed again on this at bat.
 
Back
Top Bottom