- Joined
- Feb 25, 2019
- Messages
- 60,583
- Reaction score
- 31,337
- Location
- Devonshire, England
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Hardly, you would fall off that horse if you ever had the courage to mount.
So you have nothing to say. Unsurprising.
Hardly, you would fall off that horse if you ever had the courage to mount.
So he paid close to a million dollar settlement and lost his right to practice law by admitting his mistakes? I heard nothing like that from Clinton.
Trump paid a $2M+ settlement to charities chosen by NY attorneys office and cannot ever operate a charity again. His children had to take classes on how charities and foundations should be operated legally.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Give me a bit of time to try to untangle what that has to do with why Clinton was impeached.
You stated Clinton had to pay a settlement and lost his license to practice law. That isnt why he was impeached. He admitted to lying, apologized for it still faced those punishments because apologizing doesnt take the place for punishment. He was impeached because he lied under oath about an affair. The proper punishment for that is losing his license and paying a settlement in many cases. Trying to remove him from office for it is petty since it had nothing to do with his ability to govern the country. The prevailing philosophy for it at the time was "well he was caught lying, UNDER OATH". So what? Trump is caught lying almost every day about important stuff. Whether Clinton had a consensual affair with an intern really wasnt that important to the nation. Hence the outcome.Give me a bit of time to try to untangle what that has to do with why Clinton was impeached.
You stated Clinton had to pay a settlement and lost his license to practice law. That isnt why he was impeached. He admitted to lying, apologized for it still faced those punishments because apologizing doesnt take the place for punishment. He was impeached because he lied under oath about an affair. The proper punishment for that is losing his license and paying a settlement in many cases. Trying to remove him from office for it is petty since it had nothing to do with his ability to govern the country. The prevailing philosophy for it at the time was "well he was caught lying, UNDER OATH". So what? Trump is caught lying almost every day about important stuff. Whether Clinton had a consensual affair with an intern really wasnt that important to the nation. Hence the outcome.
And I'm saying that running a scam foundation that has already been shut down by the government for dirty practices, had purported itself as a kind of charity that receives donations and gave them out to veterans or others but then reneged on that or only gave a small fraction of what it received to those charities, lied about who was on their board and what they did/were set up for, broke laws related to campaign use and what such organizations can do, and more generally demonstrated what sort of corruption a person would be involved with is far worse than lying under oath, particularly when the owner of that foundation would fight tooth and nail against testifying under oath as they know they would be caught lying in a heartbeat.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
You stated Clinton had to pay a settlement and lost his license to practice law. That isnt why he was impeached. He admitted to lying, apologized for it still faced those punishments because apologizing doesnt take the place for punishment. He was impeached because he lied under oath about an affair. The proper punishment for that is losing his license and paying a settlement in many cases. Trying to remove him from office for it is petty since it had nothing to do with his ability to govern the country. The prevailing philosophy for it at the time was "well he was caught lying, UNDER OATH". So what? Trump is caught lying almost every day about important stuff. Whether Clinton had a consensual affair with an intern really wasnt that important to the nation. Hence the outcome.
And I'm saying that running a scam foundation that has already been shut down by the government for dirty practices, had purported itself as a kind of charity that receives donations and gave them out to veterans or others but then reneged on that or only gave a small fraction of what it received to those charities, lied about who was on their board and what they did/were set up for, broke laws related to campaign use and what such organizations can do, and more generally demonstrated what sort of corruption a person would be involved with is far worse than lying under oath, particularly when the owner of that foundation would fight tooth and nail against testifying under oath as they know they would be caught lying in a heartbeat.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
The case is still being investigated in NY and they cant charge a sitting President with a state crime according to enough scholars to keep them investigating for now.Democrats never charged Trump with what you are discussing.
Great point.
Take a look at the list of people who "liked" the OP. They're virtually all people who love to throw around "TDS."
Yes, I know lots of the people that use that term hate Donald Trump. I'll grant that they believe they have good reasons to do so.
I don't like Donald Trump myself. His personal history and the way he behaves is frequently repulsive and utterly disgusting. I did not vote for him.
But I support President Trump because I agree with most (not all) of the policies he has advanced as president and while I do not care in general for his "counterpunching" and "tweeting", I do admire considerably a Republican president who isn't afraid or unwilling to fight back.
Finally, I believe that the efforts people have made to oppose President Trump are far more dangerous to our country than anything President Trump has done or could conceivably do.
Thus, I find it galling to have myself (and others) labeled as "cultists". By no possible definition of the word is my support of President Trump in any way reminiscent of a cult member showing allegiance to their leader.
While I recognize that there might be some (very few) Trump supporters who would fit that stereotype, it definitely isn't most or even the majority of Trump supporters and I'm pretty sure even Trump haters would recognize that fact if they were honest.
Trump said that Pence “calls all the governors. And I tell him, I’m a different type of person, and I say, ’Mike, don’t call the governor of Washington. You’re wasting your time with him.”
“Don’t call the woman in Michigan. It doesn’t make any difference what happens,” Trump also said he told Pence, who leads the U.S. response to the coronavirus.
I've said it before, I'll say it again. If you don't want to be identified as belonging to a cult, quit acting like cultists.
I still find being labeled a "cultist" insulting and degrading. And makes me much less wiling to take anything else a Trump critic says seriously.
Yes, I know lots of the people that use that term hate Donald Trump. I'll grant that they believe they have good reasons to do so.
I don't like Donald Trump myself. His personal history and the way he behaves is frequently repulsive and utterly disgusting. I did not vote for him.
But I support President Trump because I agree with most (not all) of the policies he has advanced as president and while I do not care in general for his "counterpunching" and "tweeting", I do admire considerably a Republican president who isn't afraid or unwilling to fight back.
Finally, I believe that the efforts people have made to oppose President Trump are far more dangerous to our country than anything President Trump has done or could conceivably do.
Thus, I find it galling to have myself (and others) labeled as "cultists". By no possible definition of the word is my support of President Trump in any way reminiscent of a cult member showing allegiance to their leader.
While I recognize that there might be some (very few) Trump supporters who would fit that stereotype, it definitely isn't most or even the majority of Trump supporters and I'm pretty sure even Trump haters would recognize that fact if they were honest.
While I like having a Republican president who "fights back' I don't like how Donald Trump does it. (though I do understand how many do).
I loathe Trump because:
1) He has been twice divorced and remarried.
2) His mindless pursuit of women.
3) His use of vulgar language.
4) His need for praise and validation.
5) His role in the demise of the United States Football League in the mid 1980s.
6) His narcissism. Going all the way back to his practice of putting his name on everything he owned beginning in the 1980s or so.
7) His very appearance though I suppose he can do nothing about that at this point.
8) The very sound of his voice. Which he could eliminate a good part of by shutting the hell up.
9) His trying to make nice with dictators.
10) Actual policywise, his allowing deficits to rise dangerously.
Happy everyone?
Yes, I know lots of the people that use that term hate Donald Trump. I'll grant that they believe they have good reasons to do so.
I don't like Donald Trump myself. His personal history and the way he behaves is frequently repulsive and utterly disgusting. I did not vote for him.
But I support President Trump because I agree with most (not all) of the policies he has advanced as president and while I do not care in general for his "counterpunching" and "tweeting", I do admire considerably a Republican president who isn't afraid or unwilling to fight back.
Finally, I believe that the efforts people have made to oppose President Trump are far more dangerous to our country than anything President Trump has done or could conceivably do.
Thus, I find it galling to have myself (and others) labeled as "cultists". By no possible definition of the word is my support of President Trump in any way reminiscent of a cult member showing allegiance to their leader.
While I recognize that there might be some (very few) Trump supporters who would fit that stereotype, it definitely isn't most or even the majority of Trump supporters and I'm pretty sure even Trump haters would recognize that fact if they were honest.
But the way to demonstrate that you're not a cultist is to list the policy proposals you favored, the reasons and perhaps an update..
Didn’t the people accusing trump come after the debate he brought broadrick and Co. too??
I will always hate trump for bringing 3 known frauds falsely accusing Clinton of rape to a globally televised debate...
3 frauds trump himself called frauds repeatedly..
Not policy for sure...
But what kinda garbage human being does that?!?!
Even more so, any conservatives asked would likely say a false rape allegation is about 2 nose hairs above being a rapist, right???
And trump is LITERALLY the poster boy for fake rape allegations.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And there are people on this forum who behave as if they are in the cult of Trump.
I don't like Donald Trump myself. His personal history and the way he behaves is frequently repulsive and utterly disgusting. I did not vote for him.
But I support President Trump because I agree with most (not all) of the policies he has advanced as president and while I do not care in general for his "counterpunching" and "tweeting", I do admire considerably a Republican president who isn't afraid or unwilling to fight back.
Thus, I find it galling to have myself (and others) labeled as "cultists". By no possible definition of the word is my support of President Trump in any way reminiscent of a cult member showing allegiance to their leader.
I've said it before, I'll say it again. If you don't want to be identified as belonging to a cult, quit acting like cultists.
The irony of the Trump Derangement Syndrome cultists continues...