• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If Trump fires Mueller - Impeachment?

Would you support impeachment of Trump is Special Counsel Mueller is fired?


  • Total voters
    63
Do you even know what the term WHITE BREAD means when describing something as I did? Its is obvious you don't.

As far as Hilary Clinton inventing birtherism - that is beyond ridiculous to compare such a thing to Trump who dived in that pool and lived there for years up to his neck deep in it. If Clinton explored it at all, and its more likely a staffer who may have done that if at all, she dipped her toe ever so briefly and shallowly in the pool. To compare the two efforts is beyond ridiculous.

here is evidence of the falseness of your charge

Hillary Clinton and the birther movement: Still nothing there | PolitiFact



Lots of Republicans have long accused Trump of simply glomming onto their issues and question his actual belief in them. Guns and abortion are two obvious examples. To deny that is to deny much of the Republican accusations against him in the primaries.

I'll just address your false claim that Trump dived into the birther pool for years. That is utter nonsense. He only brought it up at all in the lead up to running for president and after Obama ultimately produced a notarized copy of his original birth certificate, he dropped it. I think many of you on the left were disappointed and attempted to keep it in the news as you thought it benefited the democrat party as long as the issue remained in the news cycles. During the actual 2016 campaign, I heard about it only from lefties wanting to keep it going. The last time I heard Trump make any mention of it at all was well before his ride down the elevator in Trump Towers when he entered the race. And do not bore me with links to Politifact articles. I do not open them. They are barely more reputable then "motherjones.com"
 
I'll just address your false claim that Trump dived into the birther pool for years. That is utter nonsense. He only brought it up at all in the lead up to running for president and after Obama ultimately produced a notarized copy of his original birth certificate, he dropped it. I think many of you on the left were disappointed and attempted to keep it in the news as you thought it benefited the democrat party as long as the issue remained in the news cycles. During the actual 2016 campaign, I heard about it only from lefties wanting to keep it going. The last time I heard Trump make any mention of it at all was well before his ride down the elevator in Trump Towers when he entered the race. And do not bore me with links to Politifact articles. I do not open them. They are barely more reputable then "motherjones.com"

Trump wounded the birther drum for years.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/17/us/politics/donald-trump-obama-birther.html?_r=0

It was not true in 2011, when Donald J. Trump mischievously began to question President Obama’s birthplace aloud in television interviews. “I’m starting to think that he was not born here,” he said at the time.

It was not true in 2012, when he took to Twitter to declare that “an ‘extremely credible source’” had called his office to inform him that Mr. Obama’s birth certificate was “a fraud.”

It was not true in 2014, when Mr. Trump invited hackers to “please hack Obama’s college records (destroyed?) and check ‘place of birth.’”

It was never true, any of it. Mr. Obama’s citizenship was never in question. No credible evidence ever suggested otherwise.

Thats pretty straight forward and demonstrates my statement is correct and truthful.

And here is a year by year timeline

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/feed...ps-president-obama-birther-conspiracy-theory/

You will not like the source - but forget about attacking it and instead show what is it saying that is factually incorrect.

and here is more

14 of Donald Trump's most outrageous 'birther' claims - CNNPolitics.com

14 different Trump statements where he dived head first into the ugly birtherism pool and stayed there for years.
 
Last edited:
Trump wounded the birther drum for years.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/17/us/politics/donald-trump-obama-birther.html?_r=0



Thats pretty straight forward and demonstrates my statement is correct and truthful.

And here is a year by year timeline

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/feed...ps-president-obama-birther-conspiracy-theory/

You will not like the source - but forget about attacking it and instead show what is it saying that is factually incorrect.

and here is more

14 of Donald Trump's most outrageous 'birther' claims - CNNPolitics.com

14 different Trump statements where he dived head first into the ugly birtherism pool and stayed there for years.

Sorry. The New York Times and CNN (Fake News) is not much better.
 
Sorry. The New York Times and CNN (Fake News) is not much better.

yes --- you should be sorry since a comment like that shows just how far on the delusional right wing extreme you are.

Instead of attacking the source, why don't you use a brain cell or two and attempt to disprove the comments of Trump himself that are documented there for all to see?
 
It's OK with you that Comey's friend "Mueller" runs the investigation?

Please don't ever expect to be taken as rational..............................ok?

Aren't some of if not most of the lawyers hired by Mueller for the Russian investigation, Hillary supporters who donated to Hillary's campaign?
 
yes --- you should be sorry since a comment like that shows just how far on the delusional right wing extreme you are.

Instead of attacking the source, why don't you use a brain cell or two and attempt to disprove the comments of Trump himself that are documented there for all to see?

When they are documented by fake news sites, I don't trust them. Remember when CNN claimed that Trump removed the bust of Martin Luther King at the White House and it turned out that a reporter was standing in front of it?
 
When they are documented by fake news sites, I don't trust them. Remember when CNN claimed that Trump removed the bust of Martin Luther King at the White House and it turned out that a reporter was standing in front of it?

Which only the far right wing thinks is their stupid nonsensical "fake news".

This is NOT about MLK or his bust.
 
When they are documented by fake news sites, I don't trust them. Remember when CNN claimed that Trump removed the bust of Martin Luther King at the White House and it turned out that a reporter was standing in front of it?

Do you have a link for that? Not because I think it's fake, but because I'd like to read it and laugh and share it elsewhere.
 
Which only the far right wing thinks is their stupid nonsensical "fake news".

This is NOT about MLK or his bust.

The MLK bust was just one small example. Many of their moronic anonymous and unsourced stories on much bigger issues have turned out to be fake.
 
The MLK bust was just one small example. Many of their moronic anonymous and unsourced stories on much bigger issues have turned out to be fake.

It certainly is a small example........ but NOT of fake news .... just a report which got it wrong and was later corrected. And I would suggest that every news media source that has been in business for a few years has examples just like that.
 
Back
Top Bottom