Idiot Cop Invents a Warrant and Accidentally Arrests FBI Agent

[dirtpoorchris]

Here is a video of the supposed incident.






If everything in this video is true then its almost kinda funny, in a sad wtf funny kinda way.

 

[Mr Person]

It's funny because **** those cops and they were dead wrong assholes.

It's sad because with most people, that would be a beat him down then charge him with resisting situation.



Edit: actually, I don't hear anything about "FBI" in the video and the resolution is crap, so I can't see the cards displayed in the wallet. It's obvious that they knew they got the wrong guy. And while I doubt anyone would not be beaten to a pulp for talking to those worthless idiot cops like that if there was no one taking vid, someone was and they knew it.

So where exactly in the video does the FBI thing come up?

 

[Excon]

Here is a video of the supposed incident.






If everything in this video is true then its almost kinda funny, in a sad wtf funny kinda way.

That black guy is an idiot and does not know the law and lied about what happened.

 

[Grand Mal]

That black guy is an idiot and does not know the law and lied about what happened.

You meant to say the FBI agent is a lying idiot who doesn't know the law, right? That what you meant to say?

 

[Excon]

You meant to say the FBI agent is a lying idiot who doesn't know the law, right? That what you meant to say?

What FBI agent? :lamo Where was that ever established in the video? Huh? It wasn't, and he wasn't an FBI agent.
So no that isn't "right". Nor is it what I meant to say.
Your rsponse is just your lame behavior on display. :lamo

The guy was an idiot and what he said was literally false.
He resisted the Officer's actions and even threatened them. He is lucky he wasn't arrested.

 

[Mr Person]

It's funny because **** those cops and they were dead wrong assholes.

It's sad because with most people, that would be a beat him down then charge him with resisting situation.

Edit: actually, I don't hear anything about "FBI" in the video and the resolution is crap, so I can't see the cards displayed in the wallet. It's obvious that they knew they got the wrong guy. And while I doubt anyone would not be beaten to a pulp for talking to those worthless idiot cops like that if there was no one taking vid, someone was and they knew it.

So where exactly in the video does the FBI thing come up?

A video going viral on social media amid widespread racial inequality protests in the U.S. carries a caption in many posts that claims it shows a black man who is actually an FBI agent being arrested. The video dates from 2019 and the man in the video is not an FBI agent.

Examples of the social media posts can be seen here and here . The posts feature a video of a black man wearing a red t-shirt getting handcuffed by two white police officers. The man questions the actions of the police throughout (here). A second clip appears to show the moments leading up to the handcuffing, with the same man saying again, “you’re assuming I’m someone I’m not” and claiming the officers are racially profiling him in a case of mistaken identity. In neither video are there audible conclusions or details revealed about the man’s profession. The officers look at the man’s ID inside his wallet during the video.

Fact check: Man detained in Rochester, Minnesota is not an FBI agent - Reuters



Still quite disgusting. They set him down on the chair and are all pointlessly aggressive. THEY initiate anything physical. All they had to do was say they think he's the subject of a warrant can they please see his ID. Instead they do the exact **** that leads to someone reflexively pulling their arm away, which is then used to beat and/or kill the victim.

If any police officers from the department saw that video, thought the cops were not out of line, and thus resigned, GOOD. We need a major changeover in how we train police and in who is currently on the force. Having a badge does not make you God and it should not mean you get a pass where a citizen wouldn't. Having a badge - and a gun to kill people with - should mean you are held to a higher degree of responsibility.

And if you disagree, you best not have said a damn thing about loving "freedoms", "rights", "the constitution", or "America." If you disagree you are an authoritarian and the only reason you don't have a problem with this is because, being white, you don't have to worry about this treatment as much. It just hasn't happened to you or your own.

Hey, I'm sure the ruling class in NK is happy, just like in China.

 

[jotathought]

It's funny because **** those cops and they were dead wrong assholes.

It's sad because with most people, that would be a beat him down then charge him with resisting situation.

The police officers identified and detained the wrong person. The black guy was a douche, resisted, threatened them and then continued to escalate after he was identified and released. Why are the police officers assholes in this video?

 

[Lord Tammerlain]

It's funny because **** those cops and they were dead wrong assholes.

It's sad because with most people, that would be a beat him down then charge him with resisting situation.



Edit: actually, I don't hear anything about "FBI" in the video and the resolution is crap, so I can't see the cards displayed in the wallet. It's obvious that they knew they got the wrong guy. And while I doubt anyone would not be beaten to a pulp for talking to those worthless idiot cops like that if there was no one taking vid, someone was and they knew it.

So where exactly in the video does the FBI thing come up?

It doesn't

It appears the FBI was spread on twitter. The guy is supposed to work as an EMT, not FBI. So he would be familiar with police procedures

 

[Mr Person]

It doesn't

It appears the FBI was spread on twitter. The guy is supposed to work as an EMT, not FBI. So he would be familiar with police procedures

yeah, I did some digging (Post 6) after posting the one you're replying to.

 

[Lord Tammerlain]

A video going viral on social media amid widespread racial inequality protests in the U.S. carries a caption in many posts that claims it shows a black man who is actually an FBI agent being arrested. The video dates from 2019 and the man in the video is not an FBI agent.

Examples of the social media posts can be seen here and here . The posts feature a video of a black man wearing a red t-shirt getting handcuffed by two white police officers. The man questions the actions of the police throughout (here). A second clip appears to show the moments leading up to the handcuffing, with the same man saying again, “you’re assuming I’m someone I’m not” and claiming the officers are racially profiling him in a case of mistaken identity. In neither video are there audible conclusions or details revealed about the man’s profession. The officers look at the man’s ID inside his wallet during the video.

Fact check: Man detained in Rochester, Minnesota is not an FBI agent - Reuters



Still quite disgusting. They set him down on the chair and are all pointlessly aggressive. THEY initiate anything physical. All they had to do was say they think he's the subject of a warrant can they please see his ID. Instead they do the exact **** that leads to someone reflexively pulling their arm away, which is then used to beat and/or kill the victim.

If any police officers from the department saw that video, thought the cops were not out of line, and thus resigned, GOOD. We need a major changeover in how we train police and in who is currently on the force. Having a badge does not make you God and it should not mean you get a pass where a citizen wouldn't. Having a badge - and a gun to kill people with - should mean you are held to a higher degree of responsibility.

And if you disagree, you best not have said a damn thing about loving "freedoms", "rights", "the constitution", or "America." If you disagree you are an authoritarian and the only reason you don't have a problem with this is because, being white, you don't have to worry about this treatment as much. It just hasn't happened to you or your own.

Hey, I'm sure the ruling class in NK is happy, just like in China.

The police officers identified and detained the wrong person. The black guy was a douche, resisted, threatened them and then continued to escalate after he was identified and released. Why are the police officers assholes in this video?

It happened in Minnesota, a state where the police do not have the right to force a person to identify themselves unless they have reasonable suspicion of a crime being committed. The police did not have that, as such they were harassing the man for no reason. He was in the right, the police in the wrong.

Which is why he asked for the cops identity

 

[Lord Tammerlain]

yeah, I did some digging (Post 6) after posting the one you're replying to.

I saw that


The police likely just wanted to identify the man, and use the generic I believe you have a warrant out on you (given that in all likely hood any man in a large city would have a similar description to a person with a warrant out on them

Tall middle age white man, with brown hair. In a city of 1 million that would be good for 30 warrants in all likely hood. So yes the police were harassing him because he was black as they had no specific warrant they were thinking about and just wanted info on him

 

[jotathought]

It happened in Minnesota, a state where the police do not have the right to force a person to identify themselves unless they have reasonable suspicion of a crime being committed. The police did not have that, as such they were harassing the man for no reason. He was in the right, the police in the wrong.

Which is why he asked for the cops identity

The man matched the description who the police believed to have a warrant and he did not cooperate to identify himself .. What is the right response? Just let him go?

 

[Lord Tammerlain]

The man matched the description who the police believed to have a warrant and he did not cooperate to identify himself .. What is the right response? Just let him go?

Let me guess on the description,

Tall black man which covers what, 35% of black men in the US, or perhaps tall thin black man, and that brings it down to what 16%. Yep that is a reasonable suspicion lol

 

[Excon]

What is the right response? Just let him go?

(Let me put on my liberal, leftist, BLM, moon-bat hat on for a sec.)

Absolutely. Pigs should capitualte to any demand they are given and simply turn away when the person wants to argue with them. That's their ****ing job.

 

[jotathought]

Let me guess on the description,

Tall black man which covers what, 35% of black men in the US, or perhaps tall thin black man, and that brings it down to what 16%. Yep that is a reasonable suspicion lol

Tall, thin black man matches the description who police officers believe has a warrant:

Police: "What's your name?"
Black man: "Screw you"
Police: "May we see your identification?"
Black man: "Screw you"
Police: "We believe you have a warrant."
Black man: "Screw you"


Yeah .. that makes perfect sense.

 

[Lord Tammerlain]

Tall, thin black man matches the description who police officers believe has a warrant:

Police: "What's your name?"
Black man: "Screw you"
Police: "May we see your identification?"
Black man: "Screw you"
Police: "We believe you have a warrant."
Black man: "Screw you"


Yeah .. that makes perfect sense.

Minnesota, a state where you can tell the police to leave you alone, where a person does not have to identify themselves to the police unless they have reasonable suspicion of a crime. Matching a generic description is not reasonable

 

[jotathought]

Minnesota, a state where you can tell the police to leave you alone, where a person does not have to identify themselves to the police unless they have reasonable suspicion of a crime. Matching a generic description is not reasonable

Okay .. to your point .. if a thin, black man matching the description (same age group, height, weight) with a warrant, how should police handle the scenario without identifying who the man is? Are you suggesting they should just ignore him? Ahhh screw it .. the warrant arrest can wait?

 

[Lord Tammerlain]

Okay .. to your point .. if a thin, black man matching the description (same age group, height, weight) with a warrant, how should police handle the scenario without identifying who the man is? Are you suggesting they should just ignore him? Ahhh screw it .. the warrant arrest can wait?

If the police can pull the warrant up with the name and crime committed sure they should be able to ask for the identity of the person. That way they have a reasonable suspicion of a crime.

If they can't bring up a warrant that matches the description of the person then no they should not. As it would not be a reasonable suspicion of a crime

 

[Individual]

Was the incident staged?

 

[Lord Tammerlain]

Was the incident staged?

It occurred a year ago I believe

 

[Xilnik]

Okay .. to your point .. if a thin, black man matching the description (same age group, height, weight) with a warrant, how should police handle the scenario without identifying who the man is? Are you suggesting they should just ignore him? Ahhh screw it .. the warrant arrest can wait?

I do not know protocol, but rather than assuming he is the person, maybe say, "You match the description of a suspect we have a warrant out on; he is 6'5", 180 lbs, African American, and bald. I understand that may match several people in the area, or even Michael Jordan when he was younger, but we would appreciate your cooperation in allowing us to see your I.D." That is less racial profiling because it provides a description that more accurately fits the man in the video, and a joke might help to alleviate some of the tension.

That is just my take, and someone might still find it offensive or get defensive. What do other people think? Is there a better tact?

 

[jotathought]

I do not know protocol, but rather than assuming he is the person, maybe say, "You match the description of a suspect we have a warrant out on; he is 6'5", 180 lbs, African American, and bald. I understand that may match several people in the area, or even Michael Jordan when he was younger, but we would appreciate your cooperation in allowing us to see your I.D." That is less racial profiling because it provides a description that more accurately fits the man in the video, and a joke might help to alleviate some of the tension.

That is just my take, and someone might still find it offensive or get defensive. What do other people think? Is there a better tact?

How is it racial profiling since they based their decision on a number of parameters that matched a description: race, height, weight or features (e.g. your example of baldness), etc.? Do we know that the suspect may have been described as armed and dangerous? Habitual offender? Aggressive?

The police misidentified him and released him once his identification was confirmed. He is the one who chose to become aggressive and continued to escalate once the police released him.

 

[Xilnik]

How is it racial profiling since they based their decision on a number of parameters that matched a description: race, height, weight or features (e.g. your example of baldness), etc.? Do we know that the suspect may have been described as armed and dangerous? Habitual offender? Aggressive?

The police misidentified him and released him once his identification was confirmed. He is the one who chose to become aggressive and continued to escalate once the police released him.

There was nothing in the video to indicate what their reason for detaining him was. The arresting officer did not describe the suspect from the warrant. He just said, "I think you have a warrant." I would find that strange if I knew I did nothing wrong too. I probably would not know how to react since I have never been in that situation.

I remember my first encounter with the police when I was 17. I was pulled over, and I took my seatbelt off because I was not sure if I would be asked to step out of the car. The officer thankfully did not give me a ticket for not wearing a seatbelt and assumed I had taken it off after being pulled over, but I did not tell him that. I was too afraid and nervous to think and be completely honest about it.

I shared that because I have no idea if the man being arrested in the video even thought about sharing his I.D. before deciding to say he was not who they thought he was. If it was me in the same situation, I would offer my I.D., but that is after seeing this video, so I cannot say reasonably that it would have occurred to me on the spot.